# The AI Future Nobody Wants To Talk About

## Метаданные

- **Канал:** TheAIGRID
- **YouTube:** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WD-jgn-ltO0
- **Дата:** 01.06.2025
- **Длительность:** 36:40
- **Просмотры:** 44,516
- **Источник:** https://ekstraktznaniy.ru/video/12651

## Описание

Want to stay up to date with ai news - https://aigrid.beehiiv.com/subscribe
🐤 Follow Me on Twitter https://twitter.com/TheAiGrid
🌐 Checkout My website - https://theaigrid.com/


Links From Todays Video:

00:00 – White Collar Vanish
01:00 – Economic Earthquake Incoming
03:00 – CEO's Bold Warning
05:00 – 5-Year Countdown
07:00 – Hidden Capabilities Exposed
09:00 – Employment Endgame Theory
11:00 – Graduates Left Behind
13:00 – Obama Weighs In
15:00 – Fiverr’s Reality Check
17:00 – AI-First Companies Rise
19:00 – Warehouse Takeover Begins
21:00 – DeepMind’s Grim Truth
23:00 – Altman on Collapse
25:00 – Jobs Redefined Forever
27:00 – Perplexity’s Dystopia
29:00 – Collapse Like Sand
31:00 – Governing AI Race
33:00 – WF Report Insights
35:00 – Speed is Terrifying

Welcome to my channel where i bring you the latest breakthroughs in AI. From deep learning to robotics, i cover it all. My videos offer valuable insights and perspectives that will expand your knowledge and understanding of this ra

## Транскрипт

### White Collar Vanish []

uh many other areas like that entry-level white collar work. I worry that those things are going to be first augmented but before long replaced by AI systems. We're about to disrupt millions of jobs without people having a new alternate economic future. That's going to create so much economic anxiety that we can't just roll out AI and destabilize society and overwhelm society. People will lose jobs. Many new jobs will be created. I think much better jobs. uh we feel a responsibility to educate society as we see it. We'll be right about some things wrong about others. Uh and to be as good as we can at being stewards of this technology, but you know, not everyone's going to like all of the impacts, but this is coming. This is like this is a scientific achievement of humanity that is going to get embedded in everything we do. So, the AI job apocalypse might be closer than we think. And this video is going to truly explain why tech leaders are warning of mass unemployment within just 5 years. Now, this story

### Economic Earthquake Incoming [1:00]

genuinely has people freaking out on social media. And after a deep dive into what's happening, I can truly understand why. We're not talking about some distant sci-fi future scenario anymore. According to some of the biggest names in AI, we might be looking at the most dramatic job displacement in human history, and it could happen way sooner than anyone expected. So, before we get into the meat of things, I want to show you guys this channel because this isn't my first rodeo when it comes to speaking about AI and jobs. I've been doing AI on YouTube for around 2 years, and I've been looking into AI for even longer than that. And job loss was something that I was so passionate about that last year I created a dedicated channel to exploring all of the ways and which it would actually affect people. And it was remarkable some of the things I found. I was even so passionate that I actually managed to create a post AGI preparedness framework which essentially allows individuals who aren't really up to date with AI and AGI to not be surprised when massive economic changes come. It basically allows you to be bulletproof when it comes to the coming AI changes. I was actually so paranoid that I created an entire database of jobs and referenced those with AI tools that could basically automate large parts of those jobs. And this was so that I was essentially one step ahead of everyone else because I really didn't want to be surprised due to the future that I still believe is coming. Now, if you want to access these resources, just hit the first link in the description, enter your email, and I'll actually send these over to you for free. So, first, let's take a look at the warning that started at all. Here is where it finally begins to hit the mainstream. Dario Ammedday, who's the CEO of Anthropic, one of the most powerful AI companies in the world behind Claude, just went on the record with what he calls a blunt, scary warning for the United States government and basically everyone else. And when I tell you what he said, show you, you're going to fully understand why this is causing such a stir. Ammo Day is essentially predicting that AI could wipe out half of all entry-level

### CEO's Bold Warning [3:00]

white collar jobs within the next 1 to 5 years. We're talking about potential unemployment to spike somewhere between 10 and 20%. Now, this isn't some random tech blogger making predictions. This is literally the guy at the forefront of AI building the technology that could make this happen. Take a listen. entry levelvel jobs in areas like finance, consulting, um tech, uh many other areas like that, entry levelvel right work. I worry that those things are going to be first augmented but before long replaced by AI systems and that we we may indeed it's hard to predict the future but we may indeed have a serious employment crisis on our hands as the pipeline for these the early stage white collar work starts to uh starts to contract and dry up. What's the timeline here? I would not be surprised if somewhere between one and five years um we started to see big effects here. You know, I've heard a number of people talk about this in private. AI CEOs CEOs of other companies talk about this in private. Um uh and I really felt that uh you know, the message that this is happening hasn't been getting out to ordinary people, our legislators, our Congress people either. And so I felt I needed to speak up on the record. I do think that this is something we can prevent this uh but we need to act now. And so what really got my attention is that he actually said most people are unaware that this is about to happen and that it sounds crazy and people really just don't believe it. And the thing is that's so wild about this all is that he's not even trying to hype up his technology. He's trying, you know, to warn people about it, which is, you know, pretty unprecedented when you think about it. He says that, you know, governments need to stop sugarcoating what's coming. the CEOs of other AI companies, they really need to be honest about the future of work. And I guess it shows a high level of integrity because he's calling out

### 5-Year Countdown [5:00]

these other CEOs and other tech firms for not preaching the same message. Most people being unaware is not the scenario we want to be in when there's going to be rapid change in the future. I think we really need to think about this for a second. The people who are supposed to be preparing us for this haven't even had the conversation yet on where things are going to go. Now, the crazy thing about all of this is that it's not just Dario Amade that has said this. In this video, you're going to see multiple different tech figures all basically talk about the same message. I actually came across a podcast in which some of the anthropic employees were basically discussing that even if AI progress stalls today, like even if we never make another breakthrough in AI, the current systems that we have right now are already capable of automating all white collar jobs within the next 5 years. So take a listen to this because honestly, it is very hard to believe. They're not talking about super intelligent AI. They're essentially just stating that the technology exists today right now is powerful enough to replace pretty much every office job if the company decides to implement it properly. Even if AI progress totally stalls or you think that the models are really spiky and they don't have general intelligence, it's so economically valuable and sufficiently easy to collect data on all of these different jobs, these white collar job tasks such that to Shalto's point, we will we should expect to see them automated within the next 5 years. Yeah. Even if you need to hand spoon every single task to the model, it's like economically worthwhile to do so. even if like algorithmic like progress stalls out and like we just never figure out how to like keep progress going which I don't think is the case like it that hasn't stalled out yet it seems to be going great um the current suite of algorithms are sufficient to automate white color work provided you have enough of the right kinds of data and in a way that like compared to the TAM of salaries for all of those kinds of work

### Hidden Capabilities Exposed [7:00]

is so like trivally worthwhile yeah exactly so I'm not sure if you heard that but one of the researchers eventually said that even if you need to manually train the AI for every single task, it's still economically worthwhile for the companies to do so because the savings are so massive. And that's a pretty sobering thought when you consider what that truly means for millions of workers. Now, Anthropic haven't just made this statement in this interview, although this interview was incredibly insightful. There was also this personal take that gave me chills. 11 months ago, I made a video on a top AI researcher revealing the scary future of employment. At the time, this video actually did get a decent amount of coverage. This video was essentially talking about Avatar Balwit, who's the chief of staff at Anthropic, and she essentially wrote this article where she basically said that the next 3 years might be the last few years that she works. And this isn't because she's sick and it isn't because she's retiring early. It's because she thinks that the technological changes could end employment as we know it. I'm actually going to show you three sections from this and I think it's really relevant to this video because it's another anthropic employee giving us a clear statement of the future that is to come. It talks about how I'm 25. The next 5 years might be the last few years that I work. I'm not ill. I'm not becoming a stay-at-home mom, but I stand at the edge of a technological development that seems so likely should it arrive, it will end employment as I know it. She talks about the fact that with every iteration of the model, she's confronted with something more capable and something more general than before. And she speaks about the fact that AI will essentially be able to do every economically useful task. and that given the trajectory of this current technology that she expects AI to first

### Employment Endgame Theory [9:00]

excel at any kind of online work. Essentially, anything that a remote worker can do, AI will do better. Things like copywriting, tax preparation, customer service, and many of those other tasks will soon be heavily automated. And what was particularly interesting about her point is that all of this change is occurring very rapidly and most people really haven't caught on to this message yet. And so I actually found something rather interesting. I've been following this page on Twitter for quite some time. It's called UBI Works. And essentially what they do is they focus on universal basic income looking at all of the industrywide trends. And if you aren't sure what universal basic income is, it's incredibly relevant to today's video. And essentially, it's basically where everyone gets a monthly payment that is not, you know, contingent on any work that you have to do, but just because there aren't that many jobs, people are essentially paid money because, of course, they're now unemployed. Now, 20 hours ago, they actually, you know, tweeted an article which speaks about something alarming happening to the job market. And essentially the article basically states that companies are skipping entry-level hires. And apparently they're turning to AI instead. And this might actually be the start of an AI job crisis and that UBI is worth considering before it gets even worse. In this article, it talks about, you know, according to the New York Federal Reserve, labor conditions for recent college graduates have deteriorated noticeably in the past few months and employment for new grads is now at 5. 8%. 8% which is unusually high. Even newly minted MBAs from elite programs are struggling to find work and law school applications are surging which the article describes as an ominous echo of when young people used to graduate school to bunker down during the great financial crisis. Now what's really eye opening about this article is that one economist told the Atlantic

### Graduates Left Behind [11:00]

that when you think about what generative AI can do and what jobs it can replace it's the kinds of things that you know young college grads have done in white collar firms. So as you know these you know big companies like law firms lean on AI for parallegal work and consulting firms realize that five 22 year olds with chat GBT can do the work of 20 recent grads the entry level of America's white collar economy is essentially contracting and that gap is what some people are calling an experience gap. It's not just that there's a skills gap anymore. It's that the traditional firstr rungun jobs that people use to build an experience are disappearing. How are people supposed to become experts in their field if entry-level positions that used to teach you those skills no longer exist anymore? Now, what's crazy about this is that even former presidents are taking notice. What really shows you how serious this is getting is that Barack Obama recently shared an article about this on social media. Obama wrote that now is the time for public discussions on how to maximize the benefits and limit the harms of this powerful new technology. This is also another article that talks about for recent graduates, the AI job apocalypse may already be here. I've actually seen Barack Obama speak about this for quite some time, but I really don't see any other elected officials mention this at all. With automation replacing so many blue collar jobs and pretty soon white collar jobs, we may need to consider bigger changes and we should start talking about that now. Things like a shorter work week or a universal basic income or guaranteed income. I ideas that can spread work around and supplement the incomes of people as they shift to the much needed work that I mentioned earlier that can't be automated that a program alone can't do

### Obama Weighs In [13:00]

things like child care. Now the article that he references talks about you know a few things that we just mentioned. It speaks about how millions of young people will graduate from college and that they're going to be looking for work in industries that have little use for their skills and view them basically as expensive and expendable. And, you know, they're rapidly phasing out their jobs in favor of AI. And the troubling conclusion that this, you know, New York Times writer has is that over the past several months, corporate executives and young job seekers, many of whom pointed to an emerging crisis for entry-level workers that appears to be fueled at least in part by rapid advances in AI capabilities. And that apparently AI companies are racing to build virtual workers that can replace junior employees at a fraction of the cost. And this is where we lead onto our next point because it does say that corporate attitudes towards automation are changing. Some firms have encouraged managers to become AI first, testing whether a given task can be done by AI before hiring a human to do it. Now, this is not just some investigative nonsense. This is real because I'm not sure if you know many of you guys are familiar with the company Fiverr. This is essentially a company that helps people freelance in the gig economy. And this is a company that recently has become an AI first company. And you might hear that term a lot more in the coming future. And it's basically where companies are putting AI at the forefront of their entire strategy, allowing them to save costs and be overall a more efficient organization. Now, the Fiverr CEO has been incredibly transparent about his message. So the CEO Mika Kfman, you know, one of the biggest freelancing platforms in the world, he basically sent an email to his staff that says, "It doesn't really matter what you're doing. AI is coming for you. " I'm actually going to read you some of the sections of the email because I think it's incredible that the

### Fiverr’s Reality Check [15:00]

CEO of a multi-billion dollar corporation is saying AI is coming for you and most people aren't paying attention. And he says, "I've always believed in radical candle and despise those who sugarcoat reality to avoid stating the unpleasant truth. The very basis for radical candle is care. You care enough about your friends and colleagues to tell them the truth because you want them to understand it and succeed. " So here is the unpleasant truth. AI is coming for you, your jobs. Heck, it's coming for my jobs, too. And this is a wakeup call. He says, "It doesn't matter if you're programmer, designer, product manager, data scientist, lawyer, customer support rep, salesperson, or a finance person. AI is coming for you. " He says, "You must understand that what was once considered easy tasks will no longer exist. What was considered hard tasks will be the new easy, and what was considered impossible tasks will be the new hard. if you do not become an exceptional talent at what you do, a master, you will face the need for a career change in a matter of months. And that he's not trying to scare people. He's not talking about your job at Fiverr at his company, but he's talking about your ability to stay in your profession in the industry. And so he says, "Are we all doomed? " No, not all of us. But those who don't wake up and understand the new reality fast are unfortunately doomed. Now, he does talk about, of course, in this email a few good solutions, which is pretty good because I think there's a lot of information out there that really doesn't help people. Like often times when you ask these tech CEOs, what are people going to do in the future? It is genuinely some vague answer that doesn't really help those who are seeking the kind of information that's going to point them in the right direction. But the main advice from the Fiverr CEO's email that I've basically looked at here essentially says that you need to rapidly learn all of the AI tools within whatever you know niche you're in and of course ensure that you go deep and specialize so you can become the number one person. And he basically ends the message saying that look if you don't like what I write, if you think I'm full

### AI-First Companies Rise [17:00]

of nonsense or just an who's trying to scare you, be my guest and disregard this message. I love all of you and wish you nothing but good things. But I don't think that a promising professional future awaits you if you disregard this reality. Now, what's crazy about this is that remember how I said many different organizations are now becoming all AI focused. And literally, as I was making this video, researching, going through tweets, going through old videos, I found out that Business Insider has literally just gone all in on AI, laying 21% of its staff off. It laid off around 1/5 of its workforce on Thursday in a sweeping round of cuts that affected every department and drew swift criticism. So, it is a real trend. This isn't something that is, you know, remarkably fake. And so, we've taken a look at Fiverr. Business Insider. Now, we're going to take a look at a company that you probably all know about, Amazon. So, actually saw this clip of Amazon's new robot. And essentially we can see here that they're discussing the fact that even those physical jobs, the physical tasks that you might think are, you know, potentially not automatable within the next 5 to 10 years, a lot of those inaccurate jobs are probably going to be going away. Also uh proud will be unabashedly uh proud uh that we aim to eliminate and I mean eliminate every menial, mundane and repetitive job out there. We want to eliminate that. And if it's repetitive, uh, I want to, we want to automate that. This robot system is both picking, uh, products and then stowing products. Two of the most common roles of humans inside Amazon's massive warehouse network. Second largest employer, a private sector employer in the US, um, are pickers and stoers. Um I heard the stat that this robotic system can only hand can well not only can

### Warehouse Takeover Begins [19:00]

handle about 75% of the products. So where do the humans fit in? If a fulfillment center as Amazon calls it, a warehouse today has let's just say a thousand employees um after the Vulcan system is up and running. Should we expect that same facility to have a thousand employees doing different things or maybe a number lower but perhaps some of the jobs are paying more? Like how should we be thinking about the full labor impact? Like and so this New York Times article that I found after looking at that interview clip essentially breaks down how Amazon are changing things at their distribution centers. They've got robots like Cardinal, which can organize packages in a Tetrislike fashion, and Proteus, which transports carts around without human supervision. These machines can load and unload trucks, arrange items on pallets, and move products around warehouses pretty much autonomously. But here's what's interesting. Even in warehouses, there are still tasks that robot, you know, kind of struggle with. And so I think this goes to show that even the physical labor tasks may not be safe despite them being a lot harder to automate. I still think that there are some areas where physical labor as well as these white color jobs may actually be out fairly soon. Now one of the things I shared in a video I made literally a year ago was the fact that the deep mind co-founder Mustafa Sullyan put out this warning. This was in January of last year and this was, you know, really interesting to me because I remember reading this and I was completely stunned because I didn't expect a tech CEO at the time to essentially, you know, tell us well basically the truth. And I know that might seem like I don't really have that much faith in these tech companies, but it was surprising that the Deep Mind co-founder Mustafa Sulleman basically said that AI is a fundamentally labor replacing tool over the long term. In this interview on CNNBC, he's actually pretty honest about where the technology is headed, which is a decent thing. And it literally just cuts right to the

### DeepMind’s Grim Truth [21:00]

heart of this issue. You know, it's an incredible technology, but fundamentally, what does it do? It replaces humans. And that while it's going to augment us and make us smarter and more productive for the next couple of decades, in the longer term, it's pretty much an open question. And you know he does emphasize that we need to think very hard about how we integrate these tools because left completely to the market and to their own devices these are fundamentally labor replacing tools. What does that mean for jobs in the future? I know right now it's a really tight labor market but are they going to replace humans in the workplace in massive amounts? I think in the long term we have to think over many decades very hard about how we integrate these tools because left completely to the market and to their own devices. These are fundamentally labor replacing tools. They will augment us and make us smarter and more productive for the next couple decades. But in the longer term that's an open question. Now we actually need to get onto the congressional hearing that revealed everything. Something that really opened my eyes was this congressional hearing where Senator Gary Peters grilled OpenAI CEO Sam Alman on this job displacement. Peters revealed that in a private meeting, Sam Alman said that upwards of 70% of jobs could be eliminated by AI. And when confronted about this hearing, Alman didn't even deny it. Instead, he talked about how previous technological revolutions have also displaced jobs. But he said what's different about AI is the potential speed. He explained that while society adapted, you know, in the past to huge amounts of job loss and job change, AI is essentially compressing the speed of change and it feels like that could change pretty fast. Talk to me about how you believe leaders in your industry can help mitigate job losses or deal with what could, as you described it last year, a major social disruption. The thing that I think is different this time than previous

### Altman on Collapse [23:00]

technological revolutions is the potential speed. Uh technology technological revolutions have impacted jobs and the economy for a long time. Some jobs go away. Some new jobs get created. Many jobs just get more efficient and people are able to do more and earn more money and create more and that's great. Um over some period of time uh society can adapt to a huge amount of job change and you can look at the last couple of centuries and see how much that's happened. I don't know. I don't think anyone knows exactly how fast this is going to go, but it feels like it could be pretty fast. Um, the most important thing or one of the most important things I think we can do is to put tools in the hands of people early. We have a principle that we call iterative deployment. We want people to be getting used to this technology as it's developed. We've been doing this now for almost 5 years since our first product launch. um as society and this technology co-evolve, putting great capable tools in the hands of a lot of people and letting them figure out the new things that they're going to do and create for each other and come up with um and provide sort of value back to the world on top of this new building block we have and the sort of scaffolding of society. Uh that is I think the best thing we can do uh as open AI and as our industry to be uh sort of help smooth this transition. the idea we want to get to the point where AI isn't displacing uh work but actually enhancing work that people are more productive and doing things that we probably can't even imagine what people will do. If we look a 100 years ago, we have jobs that no one can't imagine. And I don't think we can imagine the jobs on the other side of this. But even if you look today at what's happening with programming, which I'll pick because it's sort of my background and near and dear to my heart. Um what it means to be a programmer and you know an effective programmer in May of 2025 is very different than uh what it meant last time I was here in May of 2023. These tools have really changed what a programmer is capable of, the amount of code and software that the world is going to get. And it's not like people don't hire software engineers anymore, right? It's they work in a different way and they're way more productive. Now, it wasn't the only time the CEO of OpenAI

### Jobs Redefined Forever [25:00]

had something to say about the future of jobs. In this interview, he made it very clear that, you know, people will lose jobs, but at the same time, he's quite optimistic that people will find things to do. People will lose jobs. Uh many new jobs will be created. I think much better jobs. uh we feel a responsibility to educate society as we see it. We'll be right about some things wrong about others. Uh and to be as good as we can at being stewards of this technology, but you know, not everyone's going to like all of the impacts, but this is coming. This is like this is a scientific achievement of humanity that is going to get embedded in everything we do. The definition of work changes. You know, the someone that lived thousands of years ago that was trying to be like a subsistence farmer probably would look at what you and I do now and say that's not really work. They're just having fun. I think it will be so clear once these robots are off doing all of these other things that there's some special human things and we don't really care about that much what those robots do in the same way that you know we don't care that much about the machines and factories making stuff for us, right? But we'll find. And then so this is where Sam Alman on a podcast essentially says that once again we will find different things to do. But I don't think the issue is not finding things to do. I do think that of course we might need an entirely new economic system. You're living a version of that. So eventually uh I think the whole economy transforms. We'll find new things to do. I have no worry about that. We'll we always find new jobs even though every time we stare down a new technology we assume they're all going to go away. It's true that some jobs go away, but we find so many new things to do and hopefully so many better things to do. So, I think what's going to happen is this is just the next step in a long unfolding exponential curve of technological progress. Now, I've been doing some more research and one of the things I shared I think a few months ago was the dystopian vision from Perplexity CEO. So, if you don't know who this guy is, this is Aravandivas and this is the CEO of Perplexity AI. It's an incredible AI tool. He actually used to work at OpenAI

### Perplexity’s Dystopia [27:00]

and he called the dystopian aspect of AI progress is essentially the massive job loss that could come with AI advancements. The dystopian part of it is u unfortunately in the short term there's going to be a lot of labor displacement. Uh not as many people are needed to get a work done anymore. Uh so how people upskill themselves and adapt uh those who using AIS are definitely going to be well positioned. Um so all that stuff's going to take place and how people react to it. It's already like you know not you don't need um to build 10,000 people companies to be a trillion dollar company anymore. So definitely bear where are the next generation of graduates getting jobs existing big techs are laying off people or like not hiring more. So all this stuff is definitely going to impact like the market and u it's very interesting that simultaneously while creating new value and making software creation easier and uh we're also like displacing existing labor and value. So how people deal with all this is going to be interesting to watch and u I don't think anyone really knows how it'll all play out. Now he wasn't the only CEO of an AI company to be saying this. Of course in the beginning we spoke about Dario Ammedday Sam Alman of course CEO of Plexity CEOs of you know the co-founders of Google DeepMind and I came across this interesting tweet. So it was essentially saying that increasingly having conversations about replacing AI swaths of knowledge worker jobs in B2B lending in healthcare admin insurance supply chains and apparently this user was hearing anecdotes almost daily of dozens of people made redundant and that he's essentially surprised that it isn't showing up in labor data yet. And this is where the former CEO Emad Mosak of Stability AI gave his opinion. He said that AI job losses will be like a sandpar collapse. There will be a few grains of jobs that you know essentially go missing and fall and then you know all at once things basically collapse

### Collapse Like Sand [29:00]

which is not great for society. We want a gradual transition not one day everything's good and then you know the next month there are just you know millions of people out of work and he says that when that happens the natural replacement entry-level positions will disappear too in a couple of years. Now remember how we spoke about Aravanas, the person who used to work at OpenAI, now running his own billiondoll company. Well, he's not the only former OpenAI employee that has said some concerning things when it comes to the future of work. Historically, uh when you automate something, the people move on to something that hasn't been automated yet, if that makes sense. And so overall, people still get their jobs in the long run. they just change what jobs they have, right? Um when you have AGI or artificial general intelligence and when you have super intelligence, you know, even better AGI, that is different. Whatever new jobs you're imagining that people could flee to after their current jobs are automated, AGI could do those jobs, too. Uh and so that is an important difference between how automation has worked in the past and how I expect automation to work in the future. Now, one of the most thought-provoking perspectives I found came from Tristan Harris. This is the guy who co-founded the Center for Humane Technology. And Harris is warning about what he calls a race to reckless AI development. And he says this could potentially create massive economic instability and uncertainty that could destabilize society as a whole. And this is a guy who's studied how technology affects social cohesion for years. And his warnings about AI's potential impact on employment should probably be taken seriously. We're about to disrupt millions of jobs without people having a new alternate economic future. That's going to create so much economic anxiety that we can't just roll out AI and destabilize society and overwhelm society. Right now, the logic is if I don't race to deploy AI faster than the other companies or countries, then my

### Governing AI Race [31:00]

country will lose. That's why we're not regulating AI because we have to beat China. But if you that's the wrong logic. The logic is if I'm not as good at harnessing and mitigating the risks of AI, then I'm going to lose to the countries that are better at mitigating the risks of AI. So instead of it's a race to deploy the technology, it's a race for who's better at governing the technology in a way that doesn't self undermine your role. Now, we've actually looked at a lot of things in this video, but to get a better picture of what's really happening, I actually looked back at the World Economic Forum's future of jobs report 2025, which surveys over 1,000 employers across 22 industries and 55 economies. And this report essentially shows that 86% of employers expect AI and big data analytics to drive transformation in their businesses. And they are predicting significant job displacement in administrative and clerical roles with AI and robotic process automation replacing data entry clerks, cashiers and telemarketers. What's also interesting is that this you know future of jobs report predicts that while 92 million jobs could be displaced 170 million new jobs could be created particularly in AI, green technologies and healthcare. The challenge is that 63% of employees see skill gaps as a major barrier to transformation, meaning there's going to be a huge need for upskilling and reskilling. And to give you guys the gist that you might want to screenshot because it's actually quite hard to find, they do have a list of the fastest growing and declining jobs by 2030. So, you know, I've already done a video on this. I will leave a link to this if you really want to look at which roles will be there and which roles won't. You could also just search the you know the future of jobs report 2025 but we can clearly see that the top fast growing roles are the fintech engineers AI and machine learning specialist software developers security management specialists and the declining jobs are things like postal service clerks bank tellers data entry clerks printing and

### WF Report Insights [33:00]

related trades workers accounting I mean it's really interesting to see which kind of roles they expect to be gone by 2030 and which ones they expect to expand by 2030. it definitely might help you, you know, go in the right direction. And if you do want to know which skills you should probably be learning, they also have this list of the core skills you should be learning in 2025. Now, I think all of these predictions are pretty alarming, and I think it's important to look at what's actually happening on the ground. I found some analysis that suggest the timeline for complete automation might be more nuanced than some of these dire predictions suggest. The reality is that, you know, there are still significant technical limitations, practical implementation challenges, and economic factors that could slow down widespread AI adoptions. You know, most jobs involve complex human interactions, creative problem solving, contextual understanding that current AI systems still struggle with. And there's the question of whether AI will completely replace jobs or maybe just transform them. Many experts believe that, you know, AI might primarily augment human capabilities rather than lead to wholesale job displacement in the near future. And the World Economic Forum's data actually kind of supports this, suggesting that while some roles might decline, others may be redefined rather than completely eliminated. So if you want to know my personal opinion, after all the research I've gone through, it's pretty clear that some industries are facing more immediate disruption than others. As we've already spoken about, the WEF does have this list right here. But I think based on what Dario Amade said and others have said, it's pretty clear that entry-level white collar jobs in technology, finance, law, consulting seem to actually be the highest at risk. These are jobs that involve a lot of data processing, document review, basic analysis, and routine problem solving. These are the exact kind of tasks that current AI systems excel at. Customer service and copywriting also frequently mentioned as high-risk areas, especially for remote work. And if it can be done online and involves relatively standard processes, it's probably more vulnerable to automation. And on the flip side, jobs that require physical dexterity

### Speed is Terrifying [35:00]

human complex interaction, or highly specialized expertise do seem to be safer in the short term, things like plumbing, hair styling, counseling, and high level strategic worker areas where humans will have significant advantages. So I think the thing that keeps everyone up at night is, you know, the speed. I mean, the one thing that I've seen consistently is that the speed at which has this change could happen is incredible. Unlike previous technological revolutions that played out over decades, air development is happening so fast that even me, someone who's really focused on AI news sometimes falls behind. And Sam Alman talked about the speed in the congressional hearing. And it's actually good that he's acknowledged that it's a real concern. When you can train an AI system to do a job in weeks or months rather than years, the normal processes of economic adaptation just don't have time to work. And remember, the speed is compounded by the fact that AI improves itself in ways that previous technology didn't. As the anthropic chief of staff pointed out, it's the automation of automation, which means that it kind of accelerates its own development. Now, given all of this uncertainty, what should the average person actually do? The advice that keeps coming up from multiple sources is basically to start learning how to work with AI tools rather than to compete against them. The Fiverr CEO's advice to his employees was basically to master the AI tools in their fields. And the idea that you're and the idea from that is basically like, you know, you're going to be less likely to be replaced by AI if you know how to use the AI tools effectively. And as Jen Kuang from Nvidia put it, you won't lose your job to AI, but you'll lose it to someone who employs AI. That means learning how to prompt AI systems effectively, understanding their strengths and limitations, and figuring out how to combine AI capabilities with uniquely human skills like creativity, emotional intelligence, and complex problem solving.