# GPT-4 VS. Gemini Ultra (The Ultimate Head to Head Comparison)

## Метаданные

- **Канал:** Skill Leap AI
- **YouTube:** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3SGT4j8ZjY
- **Дата:** 21.02.2024
- **Длительность:** 35:10
- **Просмотры:** 57,508
- **Источник:** https://ekstraktznaniy.ru/video/12686

## Описание

GPT-4 has been the dominant AI chatbot since it came out and no one has been able to create something that can outperform it just yet. Google Ultra / Google Advanced, the paid subscription from Google is the first AI model claiming to outperform GPT-4 in some benchmark testing.

I’m going to turn both models through a set of 10 prompts across the most commonly used tasks and I’ll assign a score of 1-5 to each based on the results. We’ll test writing, research, creativity, coding, reasoning and several more categories. 

Usability test
Before I run the two prompts, let’s talk about a few limitation they both currently have.
ChatGPT has a limitation in how many answers it can provide. Gemini currently has no limitation.  

Price - As far as price, they are both $20 dollars a month, but with Gemini, you also get a few other benefits like 2 TB of storage.

Privacy - Both chatbots use conversation for training, but ChatGPT has a teams plan that will keep the conversations private.

Speed - 

## Транскрипт

### Intro []

I've spent the better part of this past week comparing gp4 with Google Gemini Ultra it's also called Google Advan to figure out exactly which one is the best AI chatbot available right now gp4 has been the dominant AI chatbot since its release it's been almost a year now but Google Ultra is really the first one that is claiming to actually outperform GPT 4 at least in some of the Benchmark testing that they released when they introduced Google Gemini Ultra so let's see if Gemini Ultra can actually keep up with gp4 and I think you're going to find some of these results really surprising now this is going to be a pretty comprehensive test so I have 10 different categories and in each category I'm going to give it a set of prompts and I'll run it through the most commonly used tasks and then within each task I'll assign a score one through five and we'll be testing categories with writing with research with creativity with coding reasoning and a bunch of other categories in this video before we jump into the prompts let's

### Limitations [1:00]

talk about a few limitations here that we have especially when it comes to usage of GPT 4 so here I have GPT 4 open and depending on which subscription plan you have you are still going to be limited on obviously how many chats you could do per hour I have What's called the teams plan that one is $30 per person per month and you have to have at least two people so let's say that's $60 so that is not the version we're going to compare with Gemini the gp4 version for individuals that's $20 a month and that one's limited to just 40 messages every 3 hours now with Gemini Advanced here this is the one that's powered by Gemini Ultra in the background this version right now there is no limitation I haven't come across any limitations I haven't seen anyone coming across any usage limitation so right off the bat this is not one of the things I'm comparing them with I'm just showing you some of the usability issues so chat GPT obviously will get some deduction points here when it comes to how much you could use it because you're going to hit that limit especially if you don't have the teams plan now we should also talk about privacy because both of these chat Bots and any of these AI chat Bots could technically use the conversation to improve the models to train the models using the conversation but we could have the teams plan that I showed you with chat GPT where by default that is disabled so this is a really nice option and one of the reasons why I upgraded to the teams plan now when it comes to Gemini I haven't seen a simple setting just yet I've been looking to try to see if there's some kind of slider like this so I think right now chpt is winning privacy but Google is obviously going to care a lot about privacy that's one of the big things they always push forward so we'll see what they come up with as far as privacy using Gemini and I should mention context window here too before we jump in context window is basically how much information can you give as your prompt how much text can you copy and paste into your prompt and let's ask Gemini so I ask Gemini what your context window is and it says it's 32,000 tokens so that's how context windows are measured if you're not familiar with it now I asked GPT 4 the same thing and it told me it's 4,000 which is not correct so it gave me the wrong answer but we'll do some accuracy testing a little bit later so I won't count this against it so I said no it's 32,000 it says yeah you're right it's 32,000 and GPT 4 does have another model called GPT 4 Turbo which has 132,000 token limit you could actually turn it on inside of Microsoft co-pilot which is powered by gp4 but not yet here but it's going to roll out I think as the default model now let's get

### Text Summarization [3:39]

into the prompting and let's actually go ahead and compare these side by side the first one I want to go through is text summarization so the prompt I'm going to use is provide two summaries of this article first one is going to be two to three sentences the second one is going to be five to six sentences and I'm going to copy and paste a large amount of text here and I'll do the same thing with chat GPT let's look at the two responses with the summary with Gemini here we got the two to three sentence summary which is exactly right it's actually really good I love the tone I like how direct it is the five to sentence summary also very good it ended up actually giving us exactly what we need to take away from that so if I just use this option let's say I have a newsletter which I do have I could then use this exact same thing and copy and paste it over there I think it's done a good job and inside of GPT 4 or same thing we got the short summary here which is again exactly three sentences so they both did the same thing here and in the detail summary here we got about five six sentences and he's again done a really good job breaking down all the different details so I feel like these large language models have gotten to a point where they're doing a pretty good job with just basic summary if you give us some context on how long you want the summary to be now let me just do a very simple prompt without any context on length or tone or style so provide a summary of this article I'll paste it here and this is what Google gave us so it went a little bit longer closer to the five six sentence version that we got before and if I look at chat GPT here we got even a little bit of a longer and they both didn't do any type of formatting they gave it to us as one chunk of text the one thing I like about the functionality of Google here though we have this quick option to modify response where I could quickly get a shorter or a simpler or more casual version which I use these very often especially when I'm summarizing text but then I want to repurpose that text for any kind of other medium like social media content and I get a quick short version of it with just one click and there is one more benefit here that Gemini has which it shows more draft so every time it creates three versions of it you're going to get slightly different answers here so you could quickly choose your favorite with open AI inside of chat GPT if I want that exact same thing I have to again use a prompt so that is more on the usability side so I'm not going to deduct any point we'll talk about a section about usability a little bit later and functionality so to give a score here for summarizing text I'm going to give them both five stars they do an excellent job pretty much every large language model does a really good job when it comes to summarizing text but in

### Copy Writing [6:20]

the very next prompt let's look at writing any type of copy writing email writing text blogs and I want to actually test these for tone style and accuracy and usability and see which one is actually going to do a good job with couple of simple prompts here here's the prompt imagine you're launching a new software tool to help businesses track social media analytics write a short Punchy product description 50 words suitable for website marketing copy now I did do a little bit more prompting here so I give it a little bit of context I want to see how well these do with context again remember with prompting the more context you give it the better results so I want them to be at equal footing here and I know chat GPT l loves to have context rather than just a one- sentence prompt and I have complete videos on this channel all about actually prompting these correctly so watch some of those if you're new to prompting and chpt gave us this description here and it's usually not good at being accurate on word counts in this case I counted and it was 49 words so it got that very close to what we requested and I think it's done a pretty good job here and sometimes in my experience it usually goes overly prom tional but with this prompt here with a little bit of context it didn't do that it actually did a pretty good job Gemini though look what Gemini did it gave us three different options so one with efficiency as the focus one with Clarity and one with solution driven the only difference is it's far less than 50 WS for every single one of these options in fact this one is only 24 warts so if you really wanted it to be more accurate on the W counts chat GPT won that battle now I still like the chat GPT output Not only was it accurate on the length the tone was right and this one I'm not testing on accuracy we'll do that a little bit later because this is a fictional product but here chat GPT wins and I do want to just do one more prompting here for writing this one is writing email so the copy I gave it is basically a colleague is sending you a frustrated email about a delayed project write a reply and this is the Gemini version here and look at this length it's fantastic length here for an email and look at this great formatting here great call to action here to set up a call and he's saying suggest a call so this is the one thing that I even was using Google bard before they changed it to Gemini for this kind of thing because it just writes in a much more natural language in my experience over chat GPT okay GPT gave us a nice subject line addressing our project delay moving forward together looking much too long I think on this first initial draft of what we got okay so when it comes to email copy I think Gemini is winning that battle a little bit more than chat GPT now because I've been using gp4 for a long time for writing copy I know a lot of times it has issue with being overly promotional but I have been able to fix that with some custom instructions I did also cover that in a different video on my channel but right now I'm going to give both of these actually four stars for writing copy I think they're getting better I think chat GPT needs a little bit more help but I think still even here when it comes to comparing these two but now some of these other tests that are ran they actually defer a whole lot okay the next one is all about the

### multimodality [9:36]

multimodality side of these model that just means how well do they interact with things that are not text with images videos and things like that and we're going to go into some extension and things like that with how they interact with YouTube videos but right now I want to see what they do when you upload an image to them for example and I uploaded a picture of a frustrated person here and it said describe what's happening in this image and explain the likely cause of this person's frustration and gp4 is doing an incredible job the vision capabilities inside of GPT 4 is kind of unmatched so far in my testing let's look at Gemini in a second but basically if you pause here they're wearing a headset they're frustrated they're in a professional setting their hand is on their forehead all of it is extremely accurate and I could follow up here to ask a little bit more details and I've been testing this a whole lot and this is where we have our fail inside of Google Gemini Advanced it just can't tell you what's going on when you upload a photo of a person it just has no idea what is in that photo obviously this is going to change I'm just comparing these two right now so this is obviously not going to get a good score for Gemini but we're going to do one more test where we don't have photos and see what we come up with now in this case I took a screenshot of a pricing page of a website here and I said turn this image into HTML and CSS code so this is going a lot more multimodal right now I want to test a little bit of coding we have a coding section coming up but I want to see can it read what's on that screenshot and turn it into code that actually is right okay this is the picture the screenshot in chat GPT that I uploaded and I pasted the same exact code okay so some of the formatting is not exactly right but he got all the numbers right okay so it did a really good job I just need to tweak some of the formatting here and overall in my experience a lot of times it does an excellent job now let's see what Gemini has it says unfortunately I can't directly generate code based on images however I could help you describe the content okay so he told me he can't do it but let's go ahead and did generate the code let me go ahead and copy this to see what he gave us I'll copy and this is what it looks like this is what that code looks like out of Gemini so not at all comparable here with that Vision capability either and I did a bunch of other tests right now and Google did say they're really going to advance the multimodality and that's what really this Advanced or Ultra model of Gemini is going to be capable of doing a whole lot more but at the moment right now I'm going to give Google only two stars only because in some of my other testing it did a good job especially with thumbnails that didn't have a picture it did analyze it to some extent so it could do something so I'm not going to just give it one star but I'm going to give chat GPT 4 four stars and the only reason I'm not giving it five stars is because it just needs a little bit of improvement to actually do some of the things that is not yet capable of so it's got a little bit of room but it's pretty close now next on

### image generation [12:40]

the list here let's look at image generation because Google Gemini recently got a new update where they can generate images now inside of Gemini and we've had Dolly 3 inside of GPT 4 so instead of a regular chat GPT we can't generate images but we're comparing the high highest model here the paid subscription Let's test it out and here's just a fun prompt and then I'll do a more business-driven prompt here for an image a photorealistic image of a cat wearing sunglasses and writing a skateboard we got four here inside of Gemini okay not bad no big issues here they're not quite photo realistic but a lot of these models still can't do that mid Journey which is a text to image generation platform is still the king okay GPT 4 this is Dolly 3 that creates this in the background not bad but again not photo realistic but it didn't really do anything that causes any issues really cool reflection of a city in the glasses and here's a more business oriented example design and Powerful logo of a construction company called Apex Builder with a little bit of context here on what I want this is what we got out of chat GPT and when I asked Gemini to do the same thing for some reason he gave us three different concept ideas instead of the image and it says go and use canva to make the image and it's giving me a bunch of other links it's recommending m Journey mid Journey makes awesome logos Dolly makes awesome logos and some other links here so it's cool that it's giving me links but it's not at all doing what I want here so when it comes to a score I'm going to give chat GPT for creating images three stars because I think it just has a far long way to go till it reaches mid Journey or another app called Leonardo so for image text to image there's just better tools out there so I still haven't created everything I want to inside of do and it does typos constantly but nobody has figured out how to do correct text so as you can see this has a typo in it already Gemini though I'm only going to give it one star and only because it can make images and it kind of made images of a cat and he gave me multiple variations but it would be far down the list for me of all the different AI tools especially since I'm comparing a paid tool here the free Gemini does image creation too but is still just as good I think as Ultra they both really are not good enough for me to use them as the place I go to generate images

### research [15:04]

now let's look at research one of the most useful parts of these AI tools and I'll run a research prompt here and again I'll do a couple examples this one is for high school students so research the concept of quantum entanglement and give me a summary for a high school student and I also ask specifically for links here because I wanted to do a web search so let's run GPT 4 and then I also have a business one that might be appropriate for anyone that's in small business or entrepreneurship okay here's the answer out of chat GPD as I was reading through it was a little bit over the top again and I again I just want these things to talk like a human by default chat GPT a lot of times won't do that if you don't Define that in your prompts so that's why I teach a lot about prompting chat GPT because if you give it the right prompt it does mostly what you want but if you don't and you don't tell it I said high school student so kind of try to simplify it but I think it simplified too much but here's the one problem here I have with research when it comes to chat GT it's not my go-to tool at all if I need direct links to something in this example sometimes it does this and sometimes it doesn't give you a link at all sometimes it gives you a link but right now I can't click here to see whatever the Stanford resource is it's not clickable even though it's a hyperlink now here inside of Gemini I think I got a better answer I still don't quite like it so it would take a little bit prompting to get it to write like the way I want which I didn't give it on purpose but as you could see over here the formatting is much better and we got clickable links it's not very helpful if the link is not clickable and then you have to go to Google or something and then copy and paste here it took me directly to space. com where it pulled the answer from and this is where Google again is going to win every time is going to have access to YouTube so it gave me a direct YouTube link and Gemini and this came out before with Bard it has access to the entire YouTube library and he has YouTube Vision not only can it read the transcript of a video and the description it most of the time knows exactly what's in the video so you could tell you at this point in the video there was a slide I'll show you the extension in a little bit on how that gets activated which is activated right now so it's going to be able to look into YouTube videos extremely powerful and Gemini gets an extra point here because we have this little option double check at response if you click this it could do another Google search here so GPT uses Bing obviously Google dominates Bing and I give it a more subjective research question how could AI disrupt the accounting industry and I said give me very specific use case challenges provide links so this time I specifically asked for reports and articles and Gemini basically gave us ton of different bowet points formatted in a very easy way so this is the use case of AI in accounting these are the potential benefits and challenges relevant articles that he pulled from and he created hyperlinks here that I could click to take me directly to the website now this is something that I've notic before when I was using Bard when I was doing some of these testings I've seen this in Claude these AI models it creates a link but the page doesn't exist when I click the link so I just click the second one just to show you let me click the first one the page does not exist so this is really strange the page again does not exist even though we get a link sometimes this does happen so be careful just because you see links doesn't mean the actual page existed or you can't really use it as a reference if you're writing some kind of an actual research right chat GPT actually gave us a better formatted and more interesting response again in my opinion you could read for yourself and test it out with any prompt that you like but I got literally zero links right so they both get a zero on the link side in this case but you could see actually Gemini sometimes gets a right so this whole research category with the accuracy I'm going to give Google just one star more just because it can't do that but the fact that it just made things up here with the links that's a huge problem that they need to fix so I'm going to give Google three stars here because obviously it has the whole Google and YouTube infrastructure in his back end and I'm going to give GPT for research only two stars because I need links if you can't give me links and if it can't fix that a few months ago I would have gave it a higher star rating but it's just the links are just nowhere to be found so I don't use any of these by the way for research I use perplexity AI which is powered by these models but it's really designed for research so I'll make a different video about that now our next category is

### creativity [19:49]

creativity how creative are these models and let's go and do this prompting chat GPT use an everyday object like a paperclip and write a short monologue from that object's point of view given it a personality and I read the same exact prompt with chat GPT and they both kind of took an interesting angle to what they did they didn't choose the same object here so this one was a coffee mug here and they both wrote something in the same similar tone and the same length and I followed that up with a different style of prompt for storytelling and a lot of people use these models to help just kind of come up with story ideas and flush them out we do this with our little AI films that we make but write the opening scene to a story that blends Phil Noir and high fantasy and chat GPT with the same prompt completely dominated Gemini it gave us a much more comprehensive story much longer here and I think the character development here is also better and it's much better formatted there was a couple lines of dialogue in the other one but the formatting was a little bit all over the place inside of a paragraph GPT has been in the world of creativity for a long time and I think Gemini is more matter of fact so when it comes to creativity I'm going to give GPT 4 four stars I think it's the best model out there for creativity again remember co-pilot the Microsoft product is also powered by this so that's why I'm not comparing it here as the Top Model cuz that's technically gp4 and I'm going to give Gemini only two stars even though with our first prompt it was pretty on par and I'm only showing you two prompts on screen but I've tested closer to 10 to 15 prompts with every example I'm showing you and that's how I kind of came up with my score I'm just showing you a couple of the prompts here that I think showcase what the best results of these are okay

### coding [21:35]

let's go ahead and generate some code here so the coding test is going to be the next one write a python code for a game of snake I can run on my computer and this is a multi-step process that I want to see what it does exactly so I told it give me a step-by-step guide assuming I know nothing about programming to see I'm using a brand new computer by the way so I wanted to test this out there is no p python installed there's nothing installed on this computer and I ran this test two or three different times using multiple different games here because I thought can I just copy and paste the game that he writes for me so this is what Gemini gave me and I think it was about 13 lines of code and I just copied this and I went through the step-by-step process for some reason every time I ran this it ran out and he told me to press continue here to actually get the step-by-step guide and I followed through and I installed I try to go through all these steps and as long as I followed these steps exactly I did not get anywhere near being able to run this game on my computer okay I didn't even get to really be able to check the code the steps were not defined enough for me to be able to do it now chat GPT on the other hand first told me the step by step it says install python here's a link to python here's how you do it in Windows and Mac I'm on a Mac here it told me exactly what to type and then he gave me the code and then I was able to copy the code here and run these on my computer I ran both this one also had an issue with continue generating so I'm going to go ahead and get it to generate all the code and when I followed the prompts from chat GPT I got this snake game and it literally caused no issues here when I ran this without any programming knowledge I basically just follow the instructions here and in about maybe six minutes of having to install everything from scratch on a brand new computer I got this functioning snake game on my computer that I created the version that I got from Google it didn't work the code had an error so what I ended up doing is I actually copied and paste that same code into GPT and he fixed that code too and I tested this with tic tact toe a Hangman game and every single time even if GPT 4 didn't give me the detail steps it was able to fix any issue I came across when I just copy and pasted the error code so again as a non-developer I'm going to give GPT here for coding five stars I think it's just the most dominant thing out there for coding and so far I'm going to give bar two stars because in some of the more basic coding when it was HTML CSS things like that it works but anytime I try to do anything more advanced like what python is it just couldn't do the job so a big gap here when it comes to coding again I'm telling you as a non-developer so if you're a developer and you totally disagree please let me know in the comment section now our next prompting

### complex reasoning [24:34]

is about complex reasoning and I specifically want to see if he could do a little bit of math in the background and if it's going to be accurate with the math so at a party each guest shakes hands with every other guest exactly once if there were 66 handshakes how many guests were at the party so he has to figure that out with a little bit of math in the background now this is where Google Gemini especially with this model this Advanced or Ultra model is supposed to be excellent at reasoning and I give a ton of riddles before using a math example and he got to write about 70% of the time with pretty complex riddles and this is what it gave us so understanding the pattern it kind of broke down step by step and it created a formula and he did the math in the background and the number here is 12 so that is the accurate answer here okay and chat well for some reason it just gave us bunch of unnecessary text he told us this kind of long story I love the formatting that Gemini give us directly to the point so sometimes Gemini just is just far better when it comes to that let's see what answer we got though at the end and it says we find two solutions1 and 12 now it doesn't make sense to have a negative number as guests so number 12 is right and again I test a bunch of different prompts I think 10 different prompts to test their logic and complex reasoning here and I'm going to give both of them the same equal score of three stars only because I think they just have a far way to go to get to the five star point they still are not quite good at math and as I mentioned you know about 30% at the time they gave me the wrong answer now

### comparison [26:15]

let me compare some of the capabilities that these have because this makes a big difference on which one you're going to choose so let's start with Google Gemini here I'm going to click settings well we have something called extension and with extensions we only still have five options so since the launch they launched with these five and they haven't added it anymore and again half of them these three are related to travel basically but what is really powerful and this is what might really let Gemini win this whole race is these two right here right billions of people use Google workspace right now if you turn this on it could pull in data from those documents and those emails now chat GPT can't do that at all right it can technically with some Advanced plugins and zaap your actions it's far too complicated this is one little click away and whatever Google account you're logged into your Gmail could be pulled in that is a huge benefit right because you already have billions of people that know how to do these things or use these tools YouTube there's two pedabytes of information uploaded to YouTube daily okay that's 2,000 terabytes of information they have the largest library of content in the world right by far by a mile so the fact that we could turn this on and this has YouTube Vision I did make a YouTube Vision video inside of Bard so if you still watch that that's still the same it's just a rebranded bar to Gemini but that is a huge selling point but gp4 also has a big selling point so if I go to explore gpts we have access to custom GPT pts and we have a whole GPT store with thousands of these and these custom gpts could do very specific things the only thing is as I'm recording this they're just not quite useful I did make a GPT video of the top useful gpts but they still have a long way to go to get anywhere near what for example that Google extension does for workspace you can do those things but they are complicated they use zappier automations but gpts not this GPT store but gpts that I've created for example for my team internally insanely useful because I could train a very specific model of chat GPT with our own data set and with the teams plan that I've been mentioning it's just for our team and it's private it's not available in the GPT store I've created some like I created one called GPT finder where I chose my favorite gpts and put it over here inside of this GPT finder with a list of my favorite top 100 gpts that are actually useful but custom GPT score for me is a little bit even higher than the extension that Google brings to the table so with the Google extensions I'm going to give Gemini three stars for this capability but this could really go far imagine extension store where there's aund different useful extension and obviously Google went the quality routes so these are all massive and fantastic products that I've been using for and you've been using for many years GPT went the volume route and they let millions of people create public gpts but the ability to make those private gpts are just for your team a huge benefit there too so I'm going to give that one right now three stars once they clean up the store and that becomes a lot more useful with those custom gpds that other people can make for you then that's obviously going to go up but right now when it comes to these custom functionalities and earlier I mentioned all those limitations and things that were really ding chat GPT scored based on that but right now I'll just give both three stars when it comes to extensions and other functionalities and technically chat GPT also has this whole plug-in Library here but it's pretty clear that they're going to get rid of this plug-in store and let the GPT store take over because a lot of these plugins have become gpts already so it's kind of a little bit redundant right now and I sort of stopped using plugins and one benefit of gpts over plugins with plugins you could only activate three at a time but with custom gpts all you have to do is type in the add mention sign in your search and any recent GPT that you've been using you could just select it like you could select it like this and then interact with it so inside of the same chat you have hundreds of gpts technically millions of gpts as long as you start using them recently you could pull them into your chat very useful now

### content creation [30:44]

next let's look at content creation how good is this for creating content for social media right A lot of people use this for marketing social media post I want to see can it take one of my YouTube videos and help me grow on EX your Twitter I haven't been able to do that I think I had like a 100 followers on there I can't figure out how to do any kind of tweets I'm more on the video side of things always have been so let's see if you could take a transcript or a script for a YouTube video and create a tweet and then let's compare to see well is that a tweet I would post is it useful let's figure that out okay so the prompt is extract The Core lesson and actionable tips from this YouTube video script again the one benefit we're going to have in Gemini is we could give it a link to a video and then it's going to use that YouTube extension we're not going to have that here but we still could give it the YouTube script which through the transcript of YouTube videos those are available pretty easily condense that into a concise tweet not a LinkedIn Post in this case I'll just do a tweet suitable for quick consumption I'll paste a script this is what we got from GPT Google's new Gemini advanc Power by Ultra is $20 a month okay not bad okay let me go ahead and try to post that and it looks like it went over the limit so it didn't know what the limit is Tech update I don't know if these hashtags are any good the formatting is not good I just wouldn't post this right I wouldn't try to go on Twitter with this technique okay here is what Gemini gave me okay not bad but it's linking out to the YouTube video there was no YouTube video oh this is good this is more traditional tweet Gmail just got way better Google Gemini now integrates in your inbox well that's cool it still is telling people to go watch the video so I guess I could try that he gave me the hashtags separately the length is good far within the limit that we have so we could add some hashtags so this one I think Gemini wins this one but it's still not quite where I won I love the fact that we got three options and remember every time we have the show more drafts so technically we probably have nine different options to choose from where with the other one we just could do that in our prompt give me nine different tweets now when it comes to content repurposing I'll give chpd three stars because only if I used custom gpts I could get there inside of the chat if it was just given at the chat I would only give it two stars but with the custom gpts that I didn't show you in this video I will give it three stars and I'm going to give Gemini also three stars so I think you still have to really wrestle with these and really get good at prompting right I've been prompting for a while now but most people just don't have the patience to really craft or train a custom GPT so if you're just using this to quickly do this you might give up right after a couple attempts at it and I could see why it's not still to the point that he needs to be so three stars here for both for Content creation okay let's tally up all the points and it looks like gp4 even though it's relatively a close race I actually thought GPT 4 will just be Miles Ahead in every category I tested out after a few days of doing really deep research and really deep testing here with multiple prompt categories but gp4 is still Ste King and I think it's going to have that edge so it's going to be hard for Google to catch up but they're doing a pretty good job just Gemini has a lot of things that seem like they're in beta so their image recognition the vision the image creation some of the things where it comes to Links right a lot of those were kind of like a beta product so I know they're trying to compete and they're trying to roll things out as fast as they can but I could see Advanced or Ultra actually getting better than GPT 4 I just don't think it's anywhere near that just yet and if this is your first time here we do also have an entire e-learning platform where we have 21 different AI courses from prompt engineering to using chat GPT to all the top AI tools and all the techniques that are very practical for business owners and entrepreneurs and I purposely made that a simple monthly subscription that is extremely affordable to actually be able to teach AI to the masses so that way you could subscribe you could cancel anytime and there's a free trial to make sure it's a perfect fit and you never have to buy a single course and you get access to all our new courses so I'll link that below if you want to learn more about that thanks again for all your time and I'll see you on the next video