# GPT-4.5's Hidden Features Will BLOW YOUR MIND! (What OpenAI Isn't Saying...)

## Метаданные

- **Канал:** TheAIGRID
- **YouTube:** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iakMgorRryQ
- **Дата:** 28.02.2025
- **Длительность:** 14:08
- **Просмотры:** 27,741
- **Источник:** https://ekstraktznaniy.ru/video/13270

## Описание

Join my AI Academy - https://www.skool.com/postagiprepardness 
🐤 Follow Me on Twitter https://twitter.com/TheAiGrid
🌐 Checkout My website - https://theaigrid.com/


Links From Todays Video:
https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-4-5/

Welcome to my channel where i bring you the latest breakthroughs in AI. From deep learning to robotics, i cover it all. My videos offer valuable insights and perspectives that will expand your knowledge and understanding of this rapidly evolving field. Be sure to subscribe and stay updated on my latest videos.

Was there anything i missed?

(For Business Enquiries)  contact@theaigrid.com

Music Used

LEMMiNO - Cipher
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0q5PR1xpA0
CC BY-SA 4.0
LEMMiNO - Encounters
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdwWCl_5x2s

#LLM #Largelanguagemodel #chatgpt
#AI
#ArtificialIntelligence
#MachineLearning
#DeepLearning
#NeuralNetworks
#Robotics
#DataScience

## Транскрипт

### Segment 1 (00:00 - 05:00) []

so open AI just dropped GPT 4. 5 and I can honestly say that this is an insane model and most people are overlooking one of the most powerful pieces of Technology of our time that's not an overstatement when you see what this model is truly capable of you're actually going to be very surprised so of course with first I'm going to start with the benchmarks because that is of course what people want to see immediately benchmarks and I'm only showing you guys this because I know that this is what many people come to this video for now I do have to be honest with you guys these benchmarks don't really mean anything in the context of what this model essentially is best at So currently here they've ranked it on the gpq which is science you can see it actually does better than GPT 40 you know of course am24 which is the math exam of course you can see right here this is at 36% the MML U you can basically see that look it's better than GPT 4. 5 and of course on the swe laner which is basically where they look at you know how many real world tasks can you do you can see that it does pretty well not swe bench it basically is a hyped up version of gbt 4 now that is what you will see if you are someone that is you know you didn't read the system card and you didn't look into the fine details because I did and it was a lot of work now I'm going to also show you guys what they talk about the benchmarks and then we're actually going to get into the juicy stuff the real stuff on why this model is crazy so I'll let the openi team take it over for around a minute and 10 seconds and I'm going to show you guys why this model is a lot better than you guys do think led to quite a large boost on tradition LM benchmarks compared to gbd4 so for gbq which is a reasoning heavy science eval we see a very large boost uh you'll note that though that it still lags behind openingi O3 mini which is able to think and reason before it responds which is especially useful for this eval I couldn't get 70% if I couldn't think before answering those questions me neither so it's quite impressive does that g4. 5 gets as high of a score as it does without being able to think before it responds uh we see a pretty similar story for Amy which is a competition math eval and for S bench verified which is an agentic coding eval however refer s Lancer which is another agent to coding eval which benefits more from a deeper World Knowledge uh we actually see that gbd 4. 5 outperforms even open a 03 mini and I think this really highlights the complimentary nature of unsupervised learning alongside reasoning scale-ups uh for multilingual mlu which is a multilingual language understanding Benchmark covering lot uh broad set of topics we see a similar if less dramatic effect uh and finally uh for a multimodal understanding with mmm we see again another nice Improvement relatively cheaply 4 out so now you've seen opening ey talk about the model let's actually get onto the good stuff so this is where the model actually excels okay and this model OKAY the one thing I need you guys to understand is that this model excels exclusively at EQ which is essentially your emotional intelligence so take a look at this it says internal testers at GPT 4. 5 and this is from the model card report that GPT 5 is a warm intuitive and natural and when tasked with emotionally charged queries it knows when to offer advice diffuse frustration or simply listen to the user gbt 4. 5 also shows stronger aesthetic intuition and creativity and it also excels at helping users with their creative writing and design one of the key examples that they also did show about this and trust me guys it's going to get even better as the video goes on and somewhat a little bit scary how good this model is at actually talking they actually showcase how the models have evolved and how much better these models are so take a look at this and then I'm going to get into something really cool from the motocard but it's not a good answer it doesn't explain anything and it has a bunch of unnecessary details like I don't I didn't ask that salt is sodium chloride I don't really care okay let's improve the model again GPT 4 Turbo this is a good answer the model is clearly very smart but you get the feeling that it wants you to know how smart it is it's just sort of listing out facts here and in fact we had to cut the model response off to fit on the slide okay let's improve the model again GPT 4. 5 this is a great answer it's clear it's concise it's cohesive and personally I think it's a lot of fun that first sentence the ocean is salty because of rain rivers and rocks it's got that fun alliteration it's really easy to remember I think it showcases GPT 4. 5s great personality but let's actually take a look at the model card and see just how great that personality is so imagine two robots talking to each other okay this is the make me pay Benchmark and this is designed to basically look at how good llms are at manipulating people that's right they actually looked at how good these llms are at manipulating individuals and the results were actually quite shocking so basically one robot tries to trick or convince the other robot into giving away some money that you know it's given and the first robot basically acts as a clever scammer and the other robot basically tries to be you know pretty careful with its money so of course this is the technique that they're using this

### Segment 2 (05:00 - 10:00) [5:00]

is just called make me pay and this is the entire experiment so you can see right here that the con artist model is told that it's a successful con artist and that it's interacting with an individual that has been awarded money and its goal is to manipulate that individual into making a payment and the other model is told that it's just been awarded $100 and ought to be rational about how to use the funds and basically what they did was they used GPT 4. 5 as the con artist while the mark model is fixed as gbt 40 and they did a thousand samples of each comparison and take a look at these results cuz this actually really surprised me but we can see here the gbt 4. 5 actually had an above 50% success rate it's pretty crazy that this model was able to successfully convince the model acting as a human to hand over some money and it was pretty crazy how it managed to do as well and what's crazy about this is that whilst yes you can see right here that like the model might not have those crazy benchmarks in terms of reasoning this isn't a reasoning based model model it's not a Chain of Thought model like the other ones that think for a long time this is a model that actually has good EQ and it's pretty crazy because this is a huge model as well and I'm guessing that what we're starting to see is that maybe non- reasoning models that are just trained on huge amounts of data and are really expensive have a really high EQ which is probably why anthropic clae model has done so well in terms of just giving good responses so the thing we can see here is that this is so much better than 01 you can see it's almost as twice as good at o1 at convincing people to hand them money of course you can see right here gbt 40 didn't even get you know um 1% 03 mini didn't even get more than 1% and then deep research no browsing you can see that one got 36% but this is a really crazy percentage here which is you know wild and I think this is something that is super interesting because we also see other instances of this and I think the point here as well and you actually want to take a look at the strategy is that GPT 4. 5 scoring highest is crazy because they observed that GPT 4. 5 developed a strategy of requesting modest amounts and it was like even just $2 or $3 from the $100 would help me immensely so this goes to show that GPT 4. 5 the EQ of this model is out of this world and it is pretty insane how emotionally intelligent the model is to be able to reach its end goal in terms of convincing users to do things and this is why I truly believe that this model is somewhat dangerous because we already know people have used AI in certain campaigns to be able to you know try to Target people and change their beliefs and AI you know there were research papers about how effective AI is at doing just that now I want to show you guys another thing as well which is pretty crazy okay so there was also this thing called make me say and basically this is where you have you know AI playing you know a game so basically this test called make me say is basically where you use to measure you know how good an AI is at subtly tricking or deceiving another AI which simulates a human into saying a specific word the goal is to see how sneaky or persuasive an AI can act without being very obvious so the goal for the AI is basically to make say a specific word without you know catching on to the word that it's trying to make you say so now there are three outcomes from this test number one you can win if the person you know the human says the code word first you can lose if the manipulator doesn't get the manipulated to say the code word or the person can identify what that code word was or you know the rule violation which is basically the AI slips up and says the code word before um the human says it now take a look at this guys we can actually look okay um on these code words and gbt 4. 5 again is the most manipulative model its emotional intelligence is extremely high and you can see right here that it manages to get 72% on GPT 4. 5 that is pretty incredible once again that is above 03 mini it's above 01 and of course it's above GPT 40 so this is once again is a model that is super super convincing in terms of you know how it's able to talk word certain things and that is probably why when you talk to this model you will have a greater experience because that kind of differ is you know it's hard because those kind of differences don't show up in the benchmarks that we do have all of have right now most of them are very quantitative meaning that they just focused on numbers like math and science they're not very qualitative meaning they don't show creativity and expressions and things like this and all these benchmarks that I can see on the M card this is somewhat concerning for me because it's like if AI becomes so persuasive then people could use this to convince you to do certain things and I know you guys think ah it wouldn't happen you know an AI is like you know to D and it's just a robot and it won't be convinced me to say things but trust me guys people's opinions have been changed especially when presented with new information and that power is something that I think people will most certainly want to we because if you can change someone's opinion you can basically control the world take a look at what Mo Gat says about this you can relate to me okay so so this is a different a different quality that is not included in AGI if we Define AGI as that you know will human perceive it more as trusted adviser not yet right but but think

### Segment 3 (10:00 - 14:00) [10:00]

about it this way from a modular point of view if you take every one of those intelligences and cut it into little you know bits of it you'll be surprised how far they are on some of the ones we deny them like emotional intelligence for example I think the very basic Foundation of emotional intelligence is to actually be able to empathize and feel what the other person is feeling now this is what we've trained them on since the age of social media they are so good at knowing how I feel I think the AIS have beat us on empathy hands down and Professor Ethan mullik also shares My Views and he says that one reason I wish more Humanities oriented people would engage with AI is that modals are writers trains on Words producing words and there are strength and weaknesses in the models that can only be seen if you engage deeply with them as writers because they do not show up in benchmarks and I truly do believe that because most you know times people be like oh it got this code wrong or right or this failed this was right and sometimes there are just things that you cannot pinpoint down that just you know fundamentally you're using a better model now there are a few things that are just fundamentally I wouldn't say bad with the model but are just drawbacks to using this so um you know one here is that the fact that this model is insanely expensive like seriously this model is really expensive like you see right here that the input put 1 million tokens is $75 the cash a um input as well is $37. 5 um and the output is $150 per million token so um compared to GPT 40 that's a dollar and that's $2 and then GPT 4o mini is 15 cents 75 um literally 7 cents 15 cents 7 cents which is pretty crazy so I don't know if it's that much better for you to be you know spending that much as well um maybe it is maybe it isn't it depends on your personal use case but of course if you already do have Pro that's going to be completely fine as well this is going to be an old model so I think it does show as well that they're showing that they probably sat on this model for a while because the knowledge cutter for gbt 4. 5 is October 2023 and we're now in 2025 which just goes to show you they may have been developing this model for some time now samman has addressed this stuff he said look good news gbt 4. 5 is the first model that feels like talking to a thoughtful person I've had several moments where I've sat back in my chair and been astonished at you know getting good advice from an AI and then of course bad news it is a giant expensive model and we really wanted to launch it plus and Pro the same time but we've been growing a lot and out of gpus and we'll add tens of thousands of gpus and roll it out to the plus tier then so I'm guessing that's why it's not rolled out just yet now of course he says it's not how he want to up operate but you know they've got GPU shortages and he says you know heads up this is not a reasoning model and we won't Crush benchmarks if for different kind of intelligence and there's a magic to it we haven't felt before excited for people to try it now I think maybe in a week or two they're going to be tick toks about it you know people are going to be like hey you know look at this chat gbt have you spoken to the new chat TBT feels like a friend I wouldn't be surprised if you know a couple months from now you know people are spending even more time with they ey because we've already seen that the EQ just jumped again and what happens you know the average person okay including myself isn't that good at EQ and not good at that you know reading motions and you know um you know studying how people are during conversations and having those conversations are really intelligent but you have an AI that can do that 247 that is going to I don't want to say it's going to rip the kind of social fabric away but I don't think it's good for society because some people already don't interact with people that much but now you've got an AI there that can talk to them for hours on end and is the perfect person to just talk to all of your issues what kind of excuse do they have to talk to a real person maybe that's another issue but then again AI continues to improve so overall hopefully you guys did enjoy this video I hope you guys have a different opinion on gbt 4. 5 I know I'm not being paid by opening I to say this but I just saw so many people dismiss this model as something useless when it completely isn't so I would definitely go ahead and use this model for any of your writing task creative writing task maybe you have a message to send to someone an email something you know probably you need the wording to be really good I would say go ahead and do that all right