# BREAKING: ELON MUSK Drops OPEN AI BOMBSHELL "AGI Achieved" (Elon Musk Lawsuit) Q" QSTAR

## Метаданные

- **Канал:** TheAIGRID
- **YouTube:** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWn64SjTGx8
- **Дата:** 01.03.2024
- **Длительность:** 30:50
- **Просмотры:** 146,752
- **Источник:** https://ekstraktznaniy.ru/video/14492

## Описание

✉️ Join My Weekly Newsletter - https://mailchi.mp/6cff54ad7e2e/theaigrid
🐤 Follow Me on Twitter https://twitter.com/TheAiGrid
🌐 Checkout My website - https://theaigrid.com/

Links From Todays Video:


Welcome to my channel where i bring you the latest breakthroughs in AI. From deep learning to robotics, i cover it all. My videos offer valuable insights and perspectives that will expand your knowledge and understanding of this rapidly evolving field. Be sure to subscribe and stay updated on my latest videos.

Was there anything i missed?

(For Business Enquiries)  contact@theaigrid.com

#LLM #Largelanguagemodel #chatgpt
#AI
#ArtificialIntelligence
#MachineLearning
#DeepLearning
#NeuralNetworks
#Robotics
#DataScience

## Транскрипт

### Segment 1 (00:00 - 05:00) []

so Elon Musk actually did Shock Me by this statement because he actually is suing open Ai and accusing them of putting profit before Humanity so you can see right here lawsuit says chief executive Sam elman's deal with Microsoft has broken the organization's Mission and this is actually a really big deal if you don't know Elon Musk and Sam Alman have had a very tumultuous history and they have a very long history of dealing with each other with opening eye now this lawsuit is a really really important thing because certain things that you are about to see that were disclosed aren't publicly being talked about and it's important to actually talk about some of these things because we are literally on the edge of the cliff where Humanity May jump off into an entirely new paradigm Now quickly before we actually dive into the lawsuit because I actually read the entire thing twice and I highlighted a bunch of important stuff that I think you guys should know essentially a quick overview is that it says that the world's richest man a founding board member of the original AI company behind chat gbt claimed Alman had set a flame open I's founding agreement by signing an investment deal with Microsoft the lawsuit filed in San Francisco on Thursday claims openi is now developing AGI a theoretical form of AI that can perform any tasks above the level of human or profit rather than for the benefit of humankind and this is where things are going to get crazy so I'm going to show you guys this lawsuit and highlight some insane things I've seen and me stating that these things are actually shocking is not an exaggeration so this is the 46 page lawsuit that I did actually read and I'm going to give you guys the very important bits because when I was reading this my jaw was on the ground at some of the information I found about so one of the first things that we do see here is the fact that when we see the start of the document you can see that Elon Musk is talking about of course you know the risk of AGI cuz there is a real risk of AGI and then of course it talks about how we've shifted from a human labor-based economy to primarily a human knowledge-based economy and essentially the point is that the value right now in society and in the economy is based on human intelligence and that's why you know everyone is talking about AGI and why it's an insane paradigm shift so this is something that of course sets the tone now there's a lot of stuff here that you do know about but of course it talks about how you know Mr musk well Elon you know talks about how AI poses a grave threat to humanity perhaps the greatest existential threat we've faced today now if you don't know why AI is a I guess you could say existential threat which essentially just means that this threat is one that could wipe out all of us that's what existential means and the reason that this is existential is because super intelligence is going to be vastly smarter than any of us so just think about the comparison between our intelligence and a chimp's intelligence and what we've managed to do with society and then if we manage you know another being's intelligence that's that much smarter than us what are they going to be able to do inside of the world so essentially you can see right here as Mr Joy warned with strong AGI the future doesn't need us and this is incredibly true because with artificial general and intelligence you're not really going to have much economical value for humans then in addition it actually says that you know where Ms must see existential threat in AGI others see AGI as a source of profit and power and this is why he's stating that you know some people see you know the existential nature of AGI because this is a system that actually gets us to artificial super intelligence being the threat that not only um could completely wipe us out because it's going to have beings beyond our understandings it's a threat because of course it means that many people are going to be unemployed Society is going to change radically and those that control super intelligence could actually do crazy things if they managed to control it and of course some people argue that you can can't and this is why they're stating that you know some see AGI as a source of profit and power and this is why he's talking about how open a ey they have changed okay now as we continue to go on this is where they talk about the founding agreement of open AI so essentially this is where you know Sam Alman actually talks to Elon Musk and he says that this is the greatest threat to continued existence of humanity and they are right in stating that and essentially there are other threats that I think that are more likely to happen but are unlikely to destroy every human in the universe in the way that super machine intelligence could and later that same year Mr Alman approached Mr musk with a proposal that they join forces to form a nonprofit AI lab that would try to catch up to Google in the race for AGI but that this would be the opposite of Google because Google at the time was a company that was you know closed Source focusing on you know kind of profits and stuff whereas open AI the company that they were going to make was going to be focused on sharing you know pretty much everything so you can see right here this gu would be a nonprofit developing AGI for the benefit of economy and it would be open source and this would not keep this technology closed for secret proprietary commercial reasons and as I go through this all of this important stuff is going to actually set the tone for why this lawsuit is actually rather fascinating cuz some of the things that you're about to see are truly incredible cuz I was like whoa what on Earth is this so it says of course you know something

### Segment 2 (05:00 - 10:00) [5:00]

that you didn't know is that you know Elon Musk was actually a moving force behind the creation of open AI contributing a majority of the funding in the first several years which is of course important and then of course this is a name that actually does pop up quite a bit we get the name of course recruiting Ilia satova so if you don't know there was actually a back and forth between Ilia SATA between um him going to open Ai and of course between him going to Google Deep Mind and it was really hard but eventually um you know they managed to get Elon Musk to convince ilas Sova to join opening I and that was something that was I guess you could say pivotal in making open AI to where it is today and that's why he's inclusing it so he says you know there would be have been no opening eye without Mr musk's funding contributions and the early leadership and remember this is where things get crazy so because they said that you know Transformers which were you know of course initially invented by Google and then of course here we actually talk about how this is a crazy piece of information that you know most people keep forgetting is that the Microsoft license only applies to opening eyes pre AGI technology so Microsoft obtains no rights to AGI and it was up to open AI nonprofit board not Microsoft to determine whether open AI attained AGI and that is um a very difficult thing because you know determining whether AGI has been achieved or not is something that is pretty tricky because the definitions are vague and whilst there have been Recent research papers that have come out and you know presented us with a table based on what AGI could be you know this thing and essentially This research paper from Google Deep Mind and they talk about you know where AGI is actually going to be classified so I would you know recommend everyone take a look at this because this is actually something that does show us where AGI is and where it's going to be in the future so you can see right here levels of AGI you can see there's no AGI you know emerging AGI competent AGI we don't have competent AGI yet which is General so this is the you know this side here is the one that we want to pay attention to because we've already completed the narrow um Spectrum we've already done superhuman AI you know alphafold Alpha zero stockfish these ones are like chess and all these other programs but General AI you know competent AI hasn't been achieved but emerging AGI such as chat GPT 4 and these systems are you know the first level one so once we get to here this is where things get crazy and that's where expert Ai and virtuo AGI is going to be pretty crazy so these three levels are and that's what this you know um they're talking about and of course that's why they say it's pretty much up to the nonprofit board to you know determine whether opening ey achieved AGI and something that Elon mus says about this in the later parts of this lawsuit is pretty crazy so it says in 2023 this is where they state that you know in 23 they set the founding agreement a flame so he's basically saying that in 2023 this is where everything went to hell you know like the founding agreement was just gone okay he says that you know they released their most powerful large language model GPT 4 and GPT 4 is not just capable of reasoning it's better at reasoning than the average human which is very true it scored on the 90th percentile on the uniform bar exam for lawyers 99th percentile for G verbal assessment 77% in the suar examination um and essentially gbg 4's internal design has been kept a secret and remains a complete compl secret except to openi and on information belief Microsoft okay and what's crazy is that they State here that there are no scientific Publications describing the design of gbt 4 instead there were just press releases bragging about performance which is I don't know I found that kind of funny and it says the secrecy is primarily driven by commercial considerations and not safety so essentially the reason they brought up gbt 4's Advanced capabilities is because you know open is supposed to be an open company and they've changed everything with GPT 4 and the secrecy in which they're keeping GPT 4 secret it's driven by commercial considerations not the safety considerations I do think that you know there are some safety issues with gp4 because it is a very Advanced system and I've seen some really crazy things recently but um the point is that it's not driven by safety it's driven by commercial considerations which is what they're claiming so of course what's crazy here is that they're stating that you know on information and belief gpc4 is an AGI algorithm and hence expressly outside the scope of Microsoft September 2020 exclusive license with open AI okay and then it says that you know we believe that and there are some crazy things coming on like the juicy Parts it says we believe that we could reasonably be viewed as an early yet still incomplete view of an artificial intelligence General system okay and you know here's where things get crazy okay so it says open ey is currently developing a model known as qar that has an even stronger claim to AGI as noted Microsoft only has the right to certain of opening eyes pre AGI technology but for the purposes of the Microsoft license it is up to open ey to determine whether they've achieved Ai and that's pretty crazy because you know um you know crazy things happen with the board and of course you can see he was not consistently candid with the board and this is like crazy because they're referencing qar once again and of course you know they're developing this model but we don't know exactly what qar is and remember guys qar was something that was true and the board members and everything we had this entire debacle about what went on and it's still something that is continually being brought up to today because everyone knows that this is potentially something that is rather dangerous now there's more about qar later on and some

### Segment 3 (10:00 - 15:00) [10:00]

of that information really did surprise me so this is where they talk about you know Sam Alton being fired because he wasn't consistently candid with the board and what's crazy here is they said that Mr Alman and Mr Brockman in concert with Microsoft exploited significant leverage open Ai and forced the resignation of a majority of open eyes board members including Ilia satova so they're stating that you know Ilia satova has resigned I don't know if he has resigned because we haven't seen anything yet but they're essentially stating that you know they forc the resignation of majority of their board members including Sova Mr Alman was reinstated and the new board members were picked by Mr Altman and blessed by Microsoft I actually didn't know that the new board members were picked by Microsoft I thought they were just picked by like um you know maybe just Microsoft or someone else but um picking them by Altman after he was fired is rather fascinating definitely an interesting point and then it says the new board members lack substantial AI expertise and on information and belief are ill equipped by Design to make an independent determination and whether open a has achieved AJ and I think that is pretty much a rather true statement so it's basically saying that you know when it has deployed an algorithm that is outside of the Microsoft scope license so I mean it's really really difficult to say whether or not this is going to result in some further kind of development because we know that lawsuits can be drawn out for years but some of the information that could come out of this lawsuit genuinely could change everything um because at the end I'm going to show you what this lawsuit actually does is requiring open ey to do um and if it does you know make open ey do that then we are going to get a boatload of information regarding AGI so essentially what they State here as well is that you know to this day open's website continues to profess that its Charter is to ensure that AGI benefits all of humanity in reality however openi has been transformed into a Clos sourced def facto subsidiary of the largest technology company in the world Microsoft and here's what it's crazy okay crazy statement it says it's not just developing but actually refining an AGI to maximize profits for Microsoft rather than for the benefit of humanity so I think this question okay and this is a question I did ask people on Twitter I said due to the fact that openi has previously changed okay from being you know a like closed Source you know it was previously an open source company and is now a closed Source company will open AI once again change after AGI considering that Microsoft won't have access to the AGI technology because I mean companies do change they do evolve and they do you know move in different ways and we've seen that open a has done that and I was saying how do we know open ey won't change once again after they develop AGI technology because it's under no obligation to give this technology to Microsoft so I mean it could be something I mean I don't know it's a question that I'm just asking and I think we're going to have to see and here you can see it says GPT 4 is closed Source primarily to serve the proprietary commercial interests of Microsoft okay now here's some crazy statements okay this is the part where you're about to see some crazy stuff that I did not know this was said it says Microsoft CEO boasted that it would not matter if opening eye disappeared tomorrow he explained that if we have all the IP rights and all the capability we have all the people we have all the compute we have the data we have everything we are below them above them and around them this is a crazy statement I think what he's trying to say here is that we have you know so much infrastructure around open AI that you know if they disappear tomorrow we could still continue without them and this is of course as the drama was unfolding when Sam was being fired and I'm guessing that they're basically saying that look if anything happens to open ey we are just going to completely resume control and continue along with the mission so I mean but I just think that the way that this was said you know we're above them below them and around them is a pretty uh you know incredible way to frame things and of course it says this case is far to compel open AI to agree to the founding agreement and return to the mission to develop AGI for the benefit of humanity and not to personally benefit the individual defendants and the largest technological company in the world so they're basically saying that look okay we created this company we started out with the benefit to develop a for Humanity and now you know it's just benefiting you guys and of course Microsoft now this is another crazy statement okay um and this is Mr musk concerns over AGI falling into the wrong hands and here we have you know Demis aabus of Google deepmind and you know he was talking about the dangers that AI presents in society and of course AI becomes super intelligent surpass human intelligence and then threaten Humanity because of course we know the intelligence spectrum is pretty crazy now um I found it crazy that one of the investors remarked that the best thing that he could have done for his human race was to shoot Mr hassabis then and there and this was essentially you know there was a conversation okay between investors between Demis aabus and deep mind and one of the investors said that I have no idea why they said that I'm guessing they realized the existential Nat but I don't understand why they would want to shoot someone from Google deep mind that is this is what I'm saying there are some crazy statements that I've seen in this that just made me think what on Earth is going on okay and then here we go okay you know Mr musk's uh previous conversation and this is with Larry Page he stated that unless safeguards are going to be put in place AI systems are going to replace humans making our species irrelevant or extinct and then essentially this is where you know a famous quote has come where you know M where Larry Page basically said that Mr musk was being specious and that he favored the human species over the intelligent machines and it's crazy cuz

### Segment 4 (15:00 - 20:00) [15:00]

Larry pagee I think he was the CEO of Google at the time and he said you know that you know AI systems are merely the next stage of evolution okay that is a crazy statement from the CEO of one of the biggest companies um in the world at the time he's basically saying that look it doesn't matter if human humans go extinct AI is the next stage of evolution like what kind of statement is that I mean you're human you are a human you're supposed to be focused on humanist and then Mr musk is basically saying that you know well yes I am prum I mean you know who are we dealing with is this guy a robot like why would a human say that it doesn't matter it's just Evolution like why would you not want to still be alive and continue on the human race that to me makes no sense okay um and I want to know your guys opinion on that okay of course this is also something that's you know goes to show how I wouldn't say how terrible legislation is but just how slow things move because of course Mr musk felt that President Obama understood the dangers of AI but regulation never came I'm guessing that at this time there wasn't really any you know visual fears things that you could see how quickly it's developing and of course you know here's where we look at some important statements where Mr Alman stated that if AGI was made it would be the biggest development in technology ever which is very true and that's why I'm so focused on all of this AGI technology because this is literally going to be the invention of a lifetime and okay what's crazy as well is that you know it says Mr Alman pointed out that there are many companies making strides towards achieving AGI but acknowledge the unfortunate reality that the good ones are very secret about it which is of course you know very true so many companies are making advances towards AGI okay now in addition to superhuman ma machine intelligence referred to by some Alman um in 2015 said that you know uh we should fight it of course super machine intelligence was dangerous but those who dismissed it as never going to happen and far off accused them of being engaged in sloppy and dangerous thinking and here samman is basically saying that you know people that believe super intelligence you know is far off is not the right way to think because it could happen at any time okay and this is something that we need to be aware of now there's also something here that I want you guys to be aware of okay so this is where they're talking about you know the Manhattan Project for AI they're stating you know this was in 2015 they're stating that a Manhattan project for AI we could structure it so that the tech belongs to the world via some sort of nonprofit um and people working on it get like startup like compensation if it works so this is where they're actually talking about how they were going to form open AI because of course at this time you know they realized how crazy this was and the only way to create it safely was to create it openly and of course the mission was to create the first general AI now here's where we get to some further pieces of information it says that Microsoft stands to make a fortune selling GPT 4 to the public which would not be possible if open AI as required to do makes that technology freely available to the public and this is of course contrary to the founding agreement of making everything open and then here's where we get to even more meia stuff okay this is where we get to this you know crazy algorithm okay so it says that re researchers have pointed out that one of the remaining limitations of GPT architecture-based AIS is that they generate their output at a piece in time and cannot backtrack okay and these issues have been seen before in AI research and have been largely solved for other applications in path and Maze finding AI must be able to find the right path despite the existence of dead ends along the way and the standard algorithm to perform this is called AAR pronounced AAR and then here's where we go okay Reuters has reported that opening ey is developing a secretive algorithm called qar while it's not clear what qstar is reuter has reported several open ey staff members wrote a letter warning about the potential of qar and it appears qar may now or in the future be a part of an even clearer and more striking example of artificial general intelligence that has been developed by open Ai and as an AGI it would be explicitly outside the scope of opening eyes license with Microsoft and must be made available for the benefit at the public at large so here once again we get another reference to qar okay and what's crazy is that we referenced the AAR search which is you know that previous algorithm that people are saying that qar was kind of based off they kind of iterated on that and made something even you know crazier and here's the craziest statement that I read in the paper that made me go whoa okay and it says on information and belief Mr alman's firing was due to in part of open ai's breakthrough in realizing AGI okay and in fact news report suggested that there was a rift among open AI board members and Executives regarding safety concerns and the potential threat posed by opening eyes Next Generation qstar so it's clear that what they're stating in this lawsuit is that you know the firing the reason that Sam was fired because they realized AGI they know how to get there and that you know the board members and the executive regarding safety concerns the letter that they did was of course you know because of qar or whatever it was that led to qar that led to this AGI kind of development that they know they're going to hit now for those of you guys thinking you know if they had AGI wouldn't they just do X or Y the thing is it's not about them having AGI right now but it's about them having the road mapap of knowing how to get there so how did they know how to get the road map to get there and this is the tweet that I've been referencing for quite some time okay this is from the gbt for blog post when they released it essentially they're saying that they can predict the level of intelligence based on the level of Compu that they use so you can see that this is the

### Segment 5 (20:00 - 25:00) [20:00]

graph going down you can see that they have the observed prediction then they have GPT fors capability it says predictable scaling okay remember their architecture whatever it is that they use it's predictable scaling it says a large focus on the GPT 4 project has been building a deep learning stack that scales predictably the primary reason is that for very large training runs like gbd4 it is not feasible to do extensive model specific tuning we developed infrastructure and optimization that have very predictable Behavior across multiple scales to verify the scalability we accurately predicted in advance okay now remember this stuff because when I show you the next slide you're going to be like okay that makes sense remember we accurately predicted in advance gbt 4's final loss on our internal code base not part of the training set by extrapolating from Models trained using the same methodology but by using 10,000 less compute so what they're stating is that they accurately predicted things in advance and this is why the other day when I made a video stating that look around the time when this all Fiasco was going on okay around that crazy time they started tradem like crazy gbt 5 gbt 6 gb7 okay why would they do that if they weren't predicting what those systems were going to be like think about it guys think about it the like at the time when they trademark gbt 6 and gb7 this was at the time okay when they were doing some kind of you know I don't know what was going on open AI but I'm guessing that they were probably trying to predict you know accurately predict which they could okay gbt 6 and gpt7 B based on this training loss okay I'm guessing that that's what they've done because it's clear that they can predict things in advance okay so they can verify the scalability and it is predictable scaling that's what they talk about that's why these trademarks are so important because people are stating that look it's nothing they're just trademarking something that they know they're going to use I don't think so guys I really do think that they decided to trademark these future models because at that time like literally at that time Jimmy apples were treating like crazy about some internal stuff going on at open Ai and in these trademarks they put that this one is going to have music and agents like they know where these models are going to go which makes sense for them to do that because they know exactly how they can accurately predict these models and then literally a month later after they did that crazy letter you know Reuters reported on was written to openai okay about qar and about how this technology is literally going to change and potentially damage everyone and everything and that's why I stated that you know this qar thing was something real but of course we don't know what exactly that is now here was another statement okay saan andella stated that we were very confident in our own ability we have all the IP rights and the capability if open AI disappeared tomorrow I don't want any customer of ours to be worried about it quite honestly because we have all the rights to continue Innovation not just to serve the product but we can go and just do what we were doing in Partnership ourselves we have all the people we have all the compute we have the data we have everything so this is why they're stating that you know if satin Nella is we have the people we have the computer we have everything he's stating that look AGI is going to be something that is a Microsoft product and it's not going to be something that is widely distributed it's going to be something that they profit off of something that they sell and something that they distribute based on um you know just sheer ability to control this technology now what is crazier here was that apparently Helen toner was being intimidated by a lawyer she said that Miss Tona who described the lawyer's actions as an intimidation tactic said that you know Mr alman's continued removal would in fact Advance the company's Mission by promoting the safety of humanity over profit so apparently you know they thought that removing Sam ultman was going to promote safety of humanity over profit um and but apparently none of this dissuaded the shareholders and Mr Alman pushing for his reinstatement so apparently safety was just you know kicked out the window and Salman was just you know reinstatement so of course this is um a statement by Sachin Adela we are in there we are above them below them and around them we do the kernel optimizations we build the tools we build the infrastructure that's why I think a lot of the industrial analysts are saying oh wow it's really a joint project between Microsoft and open a so I think from this as well what we are seeing is that Microsoft is much more deeply embedded than open AI than I initially had believed um but it makes sense you know they're using all of their servers I'm guessing they build the tools the infrastructure so um it's clear that essentially what they're alleging from this lawsuit is that look you know Microsoft an open AI are going to be the only people that kind of benefit from AGI which is pretty crazy then you know Microsoft don't even benefit AGI if they you know still around because of course you know Microsoft their license is only to pre agite Tech and then this is the craziest statement as well okay it says given Microsoft's a normal financial interest in keeping the gate closed to the public opening eyes new captured conflicted complaint board will have every reason to delay ever making a finding that open AI has attained AGI I'm going to read that again okay given Microsoft's a normal financial interest in keeping the gate closed to the public open AI news captured conflicted and complaint board will have every reason to delay ever making a finding that open a has attained AGI so basically they're stating that Microsoft are not going to be like look you guys have achieved AI because of course then they kind of get shut out because of course that's where their license kind of ends and that is not going to be good for anyone of course it says to the contrary opening eyes of tment of AGI like tomorrow and Annie will always be a day away ensuring that Microsoft will be licensed

### Segment 6 (25:00 - 30:00) [25:00]

the Open Eyes latest technology and the public will be shut out precisely the opposite of the founding agreement so they're basically stating that OPI is never going to admit that they have AGI because they want you know Microsoft to be able to license the technology they're just going to you know keep their energy going and that's going to keep the public out and of course okay this is a crazy statement as well says it's important to reflect on what has transparen here a nonprofit startup has collected tens of millions of dollars in contributions for the express purpose of developing a AI technology for public benefit and shortly before achieving the very Milestone that the company was created to achieve the company has become closed for profit partner with the world's largest corporation thereby personally enriching the def defendants so they're basically saying that look opening I was created to achieve General AGI for the public but instead of doing that the moment they did that they went and partnered up with Microsoft and shut it out from the public just to make profit so it's pretty crazy okay it's pretty crazy then they talk about the Investments and stuff okay and I think one thing that I do want to know is that the public is still in the dark regarding exactly what the board's deliberative review process was that resulted in the initial firing of Alman and I agree so much what on Earth was he fired for like what did he say what did he do because there is definitely some internal documents and I'm guessing they kind of want these in Discovery so when Discovery happens which is when you know the documents get released and these people are making their cases we're going to really find out exactly what happened and of course you know it says The Economist emphasize that the new board is far more likely to allow Mr Alman to scale up opening ey as quickly as possible no matter the severity of societal cost which is a damning statement um and a little bit worrying if I'm going to say the least and of course uh someone wrote a letter stating that you know should the nonprofit abandon its original Mission it should be dissolved with the proceeds going to another charitable Enterprise and what's also crazy was that open ey has also recently shuttered the public access to previously available key documents in line with open's original promise of transparency and then here's where we talk about the $7 trillion they talk about how Sam outman is of course is in reportedly discussions with middle easn investors to raise up to $7 trillion didn't mean to do that um and of course build an insane Network fabrication and that's why people are stating that you know if they can predict with you know small levels of computer how smart these systems are going to be the fact that they need $7 trillion means that they most likely do have AGI because they already know what kind of Compu they're going to need um and that just kind of proves it and then of course it says Mr Alman has been quoted stating that you know making the UAE a regulatory sandbox where AI Technologies are tested which also goes to say that maybe they're going to try and debut somewhere where there's less regulations around the AI technology and this statement as well stating that you know whilst open AI was once a pioneer of safe responsible development of AGI based on open communication with the public it's now shut its doors brought the biggest investor for profit subsidiary onto a board which owes only a fiary duty to humanity and continues in secrecy towards a profit Centric future with possible calamitous implications for Humanity so that is not a good statement this isn't good for anyone I do think that you know open AI I do hope they stick to their mission but essentially what happens now what they essentially want to happen they essentially want three things to happen Okay number one is they want opening eyes long-standing practice of making AI research and Technology available to the public which is number one so they want this available to the public again number two is the fact that they also they essentially also want gbt 4 to be AI so basically they're stating that gbt 4 constitutes artificial general intelligence and is thereby outside of the scope of opening eyes license to Microsoft so this would mean that Microsoft loses the gbt 4 access which would of course be a dent to Microsoft and I'm wondering if that is something that actually helps us because I'm guessing that maybe Elon Musk perhaps just maybe he has a personal reason for this because if Microsoft loses access to gp4 I guess maybe that kind of helps him with his AI company I'm not sure just pure speculation and of course the biggest thing is that for a jury to decide whether or not qar and other open AI Next Generation large language models in development constitute AGI so this thing the reason why this last bit is so crazy is because they want a jury to decide whether or not qar and the Next Generation so gbt 5 gb6 gb7 I don't know if they're there yet but basically want a jury to decide whether or not they de they they have AGI and of course if they're outside open A's license to Microsoft that is going to be an insane thing for a jury to decide like how is that even going to go down I mean open AI going to you know give the jury GPT 5 going to let them test it I mean like is the does the I mean I I'm speechless right now because I don't even think the jury are going to you know are the jury going to test it on benchmarks are they just going to see it you know um do certain things I mean how is that going to go down how is the jury like I'm just trying to think the average 12 people who don't pay attention to AI development if they see GPT 5 or a qar like system how are they going to know if it's AGI if they don't even know about the definition of AGI when the worst thing about this at all is that some of the greatest Minds in AI cannot agree on whether gbt 4 is Agi and don't agree on what AGI is and a lot of this stuff and basically how all of this stuff even works to begin with so um

### Segment 7 (30:00 - 30:00) [30:00]

this is a confusing part but um I do hope some of the qar information does get released and this lawsuit by far was one of the most surprising things I've seen because it now means that there is a war between two sides that side being Elon Musk and that side being open a eye and I wonder where this lawsuit would go and I think we've seen this trend of increasing lawsuits being thrown open AI um and there are just so many things going on here but let me know what you think about this lawsuit what do do you think that qar is going to be the AGI system that eventually gets you know released during Discovery do you think open ey are going to downplay qar they're going to be like you know what this system isn't that good do you think they're going to you know um potentially Nerf some of the abilities with this model um how do you think the future is going to be I mean we are at a very crazy time and this lawsuit has proven to be rather surprising so let me know what you all thought about this