21 Things You Can Do with AI for FREE (No Card Required)

Everyone thinks AI equals $20 monthly subscription. Wrong. Completely. Today, I'm showing you 21 things you can do with AI right now. 0, no credit card, just copy paste prompts. And at the end, you're getting a master prompt template. So, stick around for that. All these free tier features change every quarter. Chat GBT just added new tools. Gemini and Google Labs rotase features monthly. This is exactly why I keep everything organized inside AMS or Pro. It's my home base for all things AI related. Instead of jumping between 10 browser tabs trying to remember which prompt worked last week, I've got my mostused prompts, weekly AI updates, and a library byite-size lessons all in one place. This is your November 2025 snapshot. What actually works without a card tested yesterday. All right, let's

start with the obvious one. Writing. Because staring at a blank page sucks and AI can fix that in about 10 seconds. First up, blog post outlines. You need structure, but your brain is empty. Here's what you do. Open chat GPT or Gemini. Type create a detailed outline for a blog post about whatever your topic is. Include an introduction, five main sections with subpoints, and a conclusion. Hit enter. Boom. Both tools handle lots of text prompts on free, but you'll hit rolling limits that reset over time. The quality is comparable. Chad GPT tends to be more creative with section titles. Thanks outside the box a bit. Gemini is more straightforward and SEO friendly. Both work, but if volume matters, Gemini is the play. Next, translations. And I'm not talking about the Google Translate junk from 2010 that makes you sound like a robot. Tell either one. Translate this text to your target language. Maintain the original tone and technical accuracy. Don't lose nuance. Paste your text. Done. I tested this with a 500word technical article about machine learning. English to Spanish. Chat GPT delivered in 8 seconds. Gemini took six. Both translations were solid. Native speakers wouldn't flag them as AI. But here's the difference. Gemini preserved the formatting better. Bullet points stayed as bullet points. Paragraph breaks stayed clean. Chat GPT sometimes merges paragraphs or drops formatting. Small thing, but if you're copy pasting into a doc or a CMS, it saves you cleanup time. You probably won't hit limits on translations for either platform. You can translate all day. Use it for emails, reports, social posts, whatever. It's genuinely good. Now, social media captions. You know that moment when you have a great photo ready to post, but absolutely zero caption ideas? You're staring at the Instagram draft screen, cursor blanking, brain blank. Fix. Type. Write me five Instagram captions about your topic. Keep them under 150 characters each. Include relevant hashtags. Make them engaging. Neither is wrong. It's a vibe question. If your brand is playful and conversational, Chad GBT is your pick. If you're a B2B SAS company or a corporate account, Gemini keeps it clean. Both platforms will give you five variations instantly. Pick one, tweak if you want, and post. Saves you 20 minutes of overthinking a caption. Okay, now

we're getting into visuals. And this is where Chad GBT free and Gemini free completely split paths. If you need images, pay attention here because the difference is massive. Image generation. You want a custom graphic, but you can't draw, you don't have Photoshop, and you're definitely not paying a designer 200 bucks for a concept sketch. Here's the move. Tell Chad GPT or Gemini. Create a photorealistic image of describe exactly what you want. High quality detailed lighting, sharp focus. Both support image generation on free with daily caps. Chat GPT free uses GPT40 image generation. Google use Nano Banana. Google publishes approximately 100 per day for Gemini free. I stress tested this yesterday. 30 images in one session. Gemini kept going. Chad GPT's cabs can vary, but it is much smaller than Nano Banana in Gemini. The trade-off speed. Chad GPT generates an image in about 30 seconds to 1 minute. Gemini takes 10 to 30 seconds per image. It's faster. See, if you're a YouTuber creating thumbnail concepts or designer testing five different color palettes or a marketer mocking up ad visuals, Gemini destroys Chad GBT on volume alone. Here's a real test. I asked both. A cat wearing sunglasses riding a skateboard through a cyberpunk city at sunset. Neon lights cinematic composition. Chad GPT delivered a beautiful, sharp, vibrant image in 11 seconds. Gemini took 27 seconds. The quality honestly comparable. Both nailed the vibe. After a couple of images, Chad GPT hit me with, "You've reached your daily image limit. " Gemini still going. I generated more variations just to see. No problem. If you only need some quick images, Chat GPT can do it. If you need volume, 5, 10, 20 variations, Gemini is the only option that won't gate you. Next feature, handwriting transcription. Super underrated. You're in a meeting. You took notes by hand because typing felt rude. Now you need those notes in a dock. Don't retype. Snap a photo with your phone. Upload it to chat GPT or Gemini. Say, "Transcribe this handwritten text into clean typed text. " both handle this. Accuracy sits around 85 to 90% if your handwriting's decent. If your handwriting looks like a seismograph during an earthquake, good luck. It'll try, but expect errors. I tested this with meeting notes. Chad GPT transcribed them in about 15 seconds. Gemini took 12. Both caught most words. Chad GPT's interface for image uploads is slightly cleaner. Drag, drop, done. Gemini is better if your image is already in Google Drive because it can pull directly from there without a manual upload step. Limits. Chat GPT free supports file uploads with size and usage limits that can vary. The same limits apply to files pulled from Google Drive or One Drive. Gemini gives you something like 10 uploads per session, but sessions reset every few hours depending on activity. So, if you're digitizing a stack of handwritten notes, use Gemini. Spread it across sessions if needed. One last thing, background removal. On the free plans, both tools can attempt it, but results aren't perfect. Chat GPT can remove the background via image editing, but it often softens edges and smears fine detail. The cutout can look a bit blurry or mushy, especially around hair and textures. Gemini can also remove a background, but it frequently doesn't deliver true transparency. You'll sometimes get a non-transparent mad or a fake PSD layered look. A workable hack, ask Gemini to place your subject on a solid color, white, black, green, then knock it out and Photoshop, Photo P, or another online editor. Everyone's talking about how AI will take jobs, but honestly, the real story is that AI is already changing them. Most people scroll past it until it hits their own field. That's why I've teamed up with Outskll. They've trained over 10 million people worldwide in AI skills through their live sessions. And this weekend, they're hosting a 2-day live AI mastermind workshop running Saturday and Sunday from 10:00 a. m. to 7:00 p. m. EST. Normally, this training costs $395, but because of their big Black Friday sale, Outskill is given my viewers a free seat for the full program. Across those two days, you'll learn hands-on how to build AI automations, agents, and workflows that actually make your work faster. No fluff, just practical tools. You'll be learning directly from mentors at OpenAI, Nvidia, Microsoft, and other industry leaders, the people actually building the tech we all talk about. And if you attend both days, you'll get over $5,000 worth of bonuses, including a prompt bible, monetization road map, and your personal AI toolkit to keep. The links down in the description. Seats are free for the first thousand people. And this one's definitely worth grabbing while it lasts. So yeah, if you've been meaning to actually get good with AI instead of just watching videos about it, this is your shot. Research time.

You're drowning in PDFs, articles, reports. Someone just sent you a 40page white paper and you need the key insights in five minutes. First, document summarization. Upload your file, PDF, Word doc, text file, and say, "Summarize this document in three bullet points focused on actionable takeaways or give me a one paragraph summary of the main argument. You can upload files on free, but uploads are subject to size and usage caps that can change. The same rules apply to files pulled from drive and one drive. I tested this with a 12-page market research report on AI adoption in SMBs uploaded to Chad GPT. 15 seconds later, I had a tight three bullet summary. Clean, accurate, actionable. Uploaded the same file to Gemini. 14 seconds, same quality summary, but Gemini added citations to specific page numbers. Both platforms handle multi-page documents well on the free tier. Neither struggles with dense academic language or technical jargon. The difference is volume. If you're summarizing one dock, both work. If you're summarizing 10 docs in one sitting, Gemini better. Next, explaining complex topics simply. The explain like I'm five test. You're learning something new. Quantum computing, blockchain, macroeconomics, and every article you read sounds like it's written for someone with a PhD. Fix. Ask AI to translate it into normal human language. Prompt: Explain complex topic in simple terms that a 10-year-old would understand. Use analogies and avoid jargon. I tested this with quantum entanglement. Both are good. Chad GPT feels like a patient tutor. Gemini feels like a textbook that's trying to be friendly. Pick your style. Neither has daily limits on explanations. You can ask a 100 questions in a row if you want. Last research feature, realtime search and fresh info. Even though both models were trained on data that effectively stops in 2024, Gemini free and Chad GBT free can both hit the live web and pull current sources. Chad GBT's built-in search returns up-to-date results with links so you're not stuck with static training data. Gemini grounds answers with Google search and even offers a double check button to verify claims against what it finds online. In practice, ask either one. Search the latest on topic and summarize the past 30 days with citations and you'll get a timeboxed roundup you can click through. If you're on deadline, journalist, researcher, student, both are solid for breaking updates. Just request sources and specify the time frame. For evergreen context, they're great, too. For what's happening now, use the live search tools and keep that past month filter in your prompt. Productivity

time. Let's make your work life less chaotic with three tools that save you hours every week. First, professional email writing. You need to send an email, but you're stuck. Maybe you're following up on a job application and don't want to sound desperate, or you're asking for a deadline extension and don't want to sound unprofessional. AI fixes this in 10 seconds. Prompt: Write a professional email to recipient about topic. The tone should be formal or friendly or apologetic. Keep it under 200 words. Include a clear call to action. I tested both with write an email rescheduling a client meeting because of a scheduling conflict. Keep it professional but warm. Both work. Chat GBT is warmer and more conversational. Feels human. Gemini is more direct and efficient. Feels professional. Neither is wrong. Pick based on your relationship with the recipient and your brand voice. It's pure text generation. You can draft 50 emails in an hour if you want. Use it for cold outreach, follow-ups, thank you notes, internal memos, customers support responses, anything. Next, organizing messy data into clean tables. You have a list of names, emails, phone numbers, and notes scattered across a doc or an email chain. You need it in a structured table with clear columns. Don't do it manually. prompt. Take this unstructured data and organize it into a table with columns for name, email, phone, notes. Format it clearly. Paste your messy data. Hit enter. Both will spit out a clean table instantly. Here's the difference. Gemini integrates with Google Sheets. You can tell it export this table directly to a new Google sheet and it'll give you a link. Chad GPT outputs a clean table in its interface, but you have to manually copy paste into Excel or sheets. small thing, but if you're doing this 10 times a day, Gemini saves you clicks. If you live in spreadsheets, finance, operations, project management, data analysis, Gemini's sheets integration is a gamecher on the free tier. Third, study flashcards. You're prepping for an exam, learning a new language, or memorizing anything. You have notes. You need flashcards. Prompt: Turn these notes into 20 flashcards in question and answer format. Make the questions test understanding, not just memorization. I tested this with a chapter on the civil rights movement in the United States. Chad GBT gave me creative, thought-provoking questions. How did the Civil Rights Act of 1964 go beyond school desegregation? Gemini gave me more straightforward, fact-based questions. Who was Rosa Parks? Both useful. Chad GBT is better for deep learning. Gemini is better for quick recall drills. Outputs plain text. copy it into Anki, Quizlet, Noteards Pro, or whatever flashcard app you use. Both platforms handle this perfectly. No limits. Or you can use study mode inside GBT or Gemini. If you're testing all these free tools like I do, you run into the same problem. Scattered prompts across 15 browser tabs, no system, and by the next week, you've forgotten what actually worked. This is exactly why I built my workflow around AMS or Pro. It's not another course you'll never finish. It's an all-in-one hook where everything actually lives. Over a 100 bite-sized lessons you can knock out in 5 minutes. 300 plus readyto-use prompts that I pull up whenever I need them. Built-in AI tools like Ask Amster where I can literally ask my AI coach remind me how to structure a cold email while I'm in the middle of writing one. And here's the part that keeps me coming back. The weekly AI digest. Every week I get a curated breakdown of what actually changed, what changed, what's new, what's worth testing, so I'm not spending 2 hours in Reddit trying to figure out if Chad GBT's new feature is real or just hype. It's built for people who want results, not more theory. We're offering the first 1,000 members 24% off the annual plan. So check the link below if you want your own home base for this

stuff. Let's talk creative uses. This is where AI becomes a brainstorming partner, not just a tool. First, story and content ideation. You're stuck on a creative project. Maybe you're writing a script and need plot twists. Maybe you're launching a product and need name ideas. Maybe you're stuck on a blog angle prompt. Generate 10 creative ideas for your project. Make them specific, unexpected, and actionable. I tested this with generate 10 plot twist ideas for a sci-fi short film about time travel. Chad GPT gave me wild cinematic concepts, parallel timelines collapsing, protagonists discovering their AI, time loops with emotional stakes. Gemini gave me structured logical twists, bootstrap paradoxes, grandfather paradox variations, causality violations, both useful. Chad GPT's more Hollywood, Geminis's more Black Mirror. You can use this for business, too. Generate 10 names for a productivity app aimed at remote workers. Both platforms spit out 10 options in 3 seconds. Pick three, test them, move on. Next, style mimicry. You want to write in a specific voice, but you're not there yet. Tell AI to copy the style. Prompt: Rewrite this product description in the style of Apple marketing. I asked both to rewrite a boring product feature list as an Apple style product page. Chat GPT nailed the aspirational, minimal, benefit driven tone. Gemini was close but slightly more formal. Both saved me an hour of rewriting. Last creative trick, word play and naming. You need a catchy tagline, a rhyme for a jingle, or alliteration for branding. Create five tagline options for product. Make them punchy, memorable, under seven words each. Both nailed it. Very nice. Or you can try give me 10 illiterative name ideas for a coffee shop in Brooklyn. Chad GPT's taglines are creative and emotional. Geminis are clear and benefit focused. Both work. Pick based on your

brand voice. Voice and audio features underused but incredibly practical. First audio transcription but not directly. You recorded a meeting, a lecture, an interview, or a voice memo. You need it in text. Don't type it manually. Workaround. Use a free transcription tool like Otter. ai's free tier, Google's live transcribe or Windows built-in voice typing. Copy the rough transcript. Paste it into chat GPT or Gemini as clean up this transcript. Fix punctuation. Remove filler words. Format it clearly. I tested this with a 10-minute podcast transcript full of umps and broken sentences. Chat GPT cleaned it in 15 seconds. Perfect punctuation, logical paragraphs, filler removed. Gemini did the same slightly faster and added timestamps where topics shifted. Both excellent for post-processing. Second, voice mode for hands-free work. This is massive if you're cooking, driving, exercising, or just prefer talking over typing. Chat GPT free includes basic voice chat. Open the app, tap the headphone icon, speak your question, it speaks back. Works surprisingly well. I used it to brainstorm video ideas while walking. Asked 15 questions in a row. No lag, clear responses. Gemini Live is available on the free tier. When it's active, it's faster than chat GPT voice and integrates with Google Assistant. You can ask it to search the web, check your calendar, or set reminders all by voice. Gemini also offers a live camera mode on the free tier, so you can chat with Gemini in real time by pointing your camera at something and asking about it. On my last trip, I used it like a museum guide, and it worked great. But in my experience, audio model is much more simple than textbased. If voice access is critical to your workflow, check which platform has it enabled for your account right now. Features rotate monthly. Third, podcast and video scripting with timing. You're creating audio content. You need a script with time markers for editing. Prompt: Write a 5-minute podcast script on topic. Include time markers every 30 seconds. Keep the tone conversational. Both platforms handle this. Chat GBT scripts feel more natural and conversational. Geminis are tighter and stay exactly on time. I asked for a threeinut explainer on blockchain. Chad GPT's version ran long but felt engaging. Geminis's hit exactly 3 minutes but read slightly robotic. Edit to taste. Before we hit the last

category, let me give you three advanced prompting tricks that make the free tiers way more powerful. Trick one, chain of thought prompting. Don't just ask for an answer. Ask AI to show its work. Instead of what's the ROI on this marketing campaign, try calculate campaign, show your work step by step. Costs, revenue, formula, final number. This forces the model to think logically and catch its own errors. I tested this with a complex Excel formula request without chain of thought. Chad GPT gave me a formula that broke. With chain of thought, it walked through the logic, spotted the error, fixed it, and explained why. Same with Gemini. Use this for math, logic problems, code debugging, strategic planning. Trick two, role assignment. Tell AI who to be instead of give me marketing advice. Try act as a senior marketing strategist with 10 years in SAS. Give me three gotomarket strategies for a new productivity tool. The quality jump is huge. I asked both for content marketing advice, generic prompt, bland surface level tips, role assigned prompt, specific tactics, channel recommendations, timeline, budget considerations, night and day difference, roles that work. Act as a copywriter, act as a data analyst, act as a teacher explaining to a beginner. Act as a skeptical investor. Trick three, few shot examples. Show AI what you want before asking for more. Instead of write me Instagram captions, try here are two examples of captions I like. Example one. Example two. Now write five more in the same style for topic. This is pattern matching. AI sees your style, replicates it. I tested this with email subject lines. Gave Chad GBT three examples of my best performing subjects. Short, punchy, curiositydriven. It generated 10 more that matched the vibe perfectly. Same with Gemini. Use this for brand voice consistency, formatting, tone matching. Bonus tip, iterate, don't restart. If the first output is 70% there, don't delete and reprompt. Say, make it shorter. Add more humor. Focus on benefits, not features. Both platforms remember context. Use it.

Personal upgrades. Small quality of life wins. Meal planning from your fridge. Snap a photo of random ingredients. Eggs, spinach, tomatoes, pasta. Upload it. Say, "Suggest three meals I can make with this quick recipes. " Both let you upload images for free. Chad GBT suggested frittata, pasta prima, shakshuka. Gemini suggested the same three, but added cook times. Gemini's image analysis is slightly faster. 6 seconds versus 9. Helpful when you're hungry. Trip planning. Plan a 3-day itinerary for city. Budget friendly mustsea sites. Local food transportation tips. Chat GPT's more creative and narrative. Gives you a story. Gemini's data driven pulls realtime info on hours, prices, reviews. For spontaneous trips, use Gemini for accuracy. For inspiration and vibe, use chat GPT. Movie recommendations. Recommend five movies similar to movie you liked and explain why. Both build a taste profile if you use them consistently. Chad GPT's recommendations feel personalized and conversational. Geminis are algorithmically solid but colder. I asked for sci-fi like a rival. Chad GPT gave me Interstellar, Annihilation, Contact, Solaris, Xmachina with many essays. Gemini gave the same list with IMDb style summaries. Both helpful different styles. Last category

troubleshooting and problem solving. Contract analysis. Disclaimer, not legal advice. But if you need to understand dense legal language, both tools help. Review this contract. Highlight concern and clauses. Explain in plain English. Chad GPT's upload interface is cleaner. Gemini is better if the doc's already in Google Drive. I uploaded a freelance contract. Both flagged payment terms. IP ownership termination notice. Chad GPT explained conversationally. Gemini gave bullet points. Both useful. Tech support. Your computer is broken and you don't want to call support. I'm getting this error message. Paste or screenshot. What's causing it and how do I fix it? Both work. I uploaded a Windows blue screen error. Chad GPT walked me through five troubleshooting steps. Gemini searched for the exact error code and linked me to Microsoft's official fix. Gemini wins for realtime accuracy here. Interview prep. Last one. Act as an interviewer for a role position. Ask me five behavioral questions one at a time. Wait for my answer. Give feedback. Chat GPT's conversational mode feels like a real interview. Gemini is more formal but gives structured feedback. I tested with a product manager role. Chat GPT asked, "Tell me about the time you failed. " I answered. It critiqued my star method. Gemini did the same but added a score out of 10. Both good for prep. Let's talk limits because free doesn't mean unlimited. Chat GPT free resets message quotas every 3 hours and tool usage every 24 hours. When you hit the limit, it downgrades to the mini model. Still useful, just less powerful. Gemini free caps you at 500 uses per month. After that, access is blocked until the next month. Workarounds, use both. If you hit ChatGpt's limit, switch to Gemini. If you hit Gemini's monthly cap, fall back to chat GPT or try Perplexity AI or Claude, which has its own free tier. Notebook LM from Google is still free during its testing phase. Great for research and note synthesis. Claude from Anthropic has a limited free tier for chat. When should you upgrade? If you're hitting limits daily and AI is core to your workflow, 20 bucks a month for Chat GBT Plus or Gemini Advanced is worth it. Plus gives you priority access and faster responses. Advanced gives you two terabytes of Google 1 storage, but for most people, 80% of use cases are covered by free tiers. You just need to know how to use them. Okay, now the

thing I promised at the beginning, the master prompt formula. It's super simple. Whenever you talk to an AI, don't just throw a question. Wrap it in this structure. First, give the bot a role who it is. Then add context. What you're working on and for whom. After that, set a clear goal, what you actually want as a result. Next, define the output format, bullets, sections, table, script, whatever. Add constraints, length, level, what not to do. Then set the tone, friendly, formal, etc. And finally, next step, tell the AI what to do after the answer. Ask follow-up questions, refine, shorten, turn into script, etc. Use this one formula and suddenly the chatbot stops being random and starts behaving like a focused expert who actually gets what you want. And if you want to go deeper, this is just one of the systems we use. Inside AM Prompt Lab Pro, you'll find 300 plus readyto-use prompt formulas for YouTube courses, emails, marketing, research, and more. So you don't have to invent all of this from scratch every time. Thank you for watching this video and I'll see you in the next