# Mini-Pod: Karen Read Part 2 | Shocking Trial Twists, Police Corruption & TikTok’s Role | MFM Podcast

## Метаданные

- **Канал:** MFM Podcast
- **YouTube:** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12s0JtOLkWI

## Содержание

### [0:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12s0JtOLkWI) Segment 1 (00:00 - 05:00)

Hey everyone. Welcome into the MFM Podcast. Dan Michele Shave in the building tonight. Um, I. Today. This is the most, I feel like it's not, it's not. We've had shave around in such a long time. Yeah. Nice. It was good to, it's nice to have you back. It's, thank you, full force. Thank you. Let's jump into, uh, this, this mini pod number one. So we need to tell Shave real quick about the Karen Reed trial. Do you know anything yet? I know her husband or nothing about her. Her boyfriend name was John O'Keefe in a serious relationship. Boston Cop. They were out one night. Getting drunk. She took him over to a house where they were having a party where it's like other cops and stuff, you know, we don't know what happened. Basically, the next morning she went back to that house. She says she dropped him off there and left. It goes back to the next morning. He's dead in the driveway. One big piece in the middle, and this is, I've said it a bunch of times, this is how I know she didn't do it, because amongst that, he went in the house and never came out. She thought he was in there with other women. Well, so she went home and left 50 something. Psycho messages like, you know what I mean? Well, lemme explain. So I'll tell you what each side is saying happened. All right, so the prosecution is saying that they were arguing that night. She took him to this house, he got outta the car and before she left, she backed into him, hid him on purpose. Well, that they're saying on per, they're saying, well, I'm gonna explain, I'm gonna, well, no, I'm gonna explain it in a second. So they're saying she backed up and hit him. Okay. And then that's how he died. All right. The defense is saying that she dropped him off, he went into the house, something happened in that house, and then they threw him outside and then pretended like nothing happened. But the, it's second degree murder. So the def, so the prosecution has to prove, not that it was premeditated, not like she planned to kill him, but that she, that she meant. To inflict harm that caused a serious injury or death. Mm. So like with no reasonable doubt. And that's where so, so she didn't know before she dropped him off that she was gonna kill him, but like in that heat of the moment, she tried to hurt him and then he died. Yeah. So, but they have to prove that. Okay. It's the only evidence they have. Wait, just wait. Is one of the cops who was just on the stand the other day said he found pieces of her taillight in the snow 12 hours later. Okay. He didn't document. Anything. The most basic thing in forensics that anyone who does forensics should know is that, you know, you take the tape measure and you find a landmark and you say, this is where I found it, and you write it down and you take notes. He did none of that. He's been investigating homicides for 10 years on the witness stand. Said he didn't even know how to do that and you know, so he was probably trying to look out the first trial the defense said, which was a mistrial by the way. That's why there's the second trial and the first trial, their defense was. This is a coverup. She's being framed. It's a good old boy network and stuff. Okay. It was a mistrial. What the defense is doing really interesting, and I think more effective this time is their opening statement was about, we're gonna show you evidence that she did not do this. Because I think it's hard for a person, yeah. A jury to be like, I. Framing. That's like conspiracies are so hard to like, do I really believe it's framing this bad though, SHA So the defense is saying, this time we're actually gonna show you evidence. She didn't do this. You have this whole framing thing too. Like that's in the background as well. Like if you don't wanna think she did it because that great, but we're gonna show you cold, hard facts that she didn't do it. So that's kind of how they're approaching this trial trial. And here's the thing is it's huge on social media. So one guy, turtle Boy, picked this up, this video, this is a blogger named Turtle Boy, and it just blew up the whole world. Thank God it did for her case. But one thing about the taillight, and then I'm gonna let him jump back in, is yes, she has a cracked taillight, but there's also video of her completely separate from the scene backing her car into John's car, and that's how her taillight got cracked. So it's not like, yeah, it seems like there's a hundred percent gonna be a. She's totally getting acquitted. Yeah. They never searched the house. A trial that hinges so much on a specific piece of evidence like that better be meticulously documented. But here's my question about the whole thing. Given the evidence and given how it's going, it really looks like that she didn't do it. Yeah. It doesn't even seem like the prosecution has that great of a case of why she did do it. I'm wondering why they even went ahead with a second, like why are they trying to go after her so hard? Becausecause, they looked so. Bad, you know? But it's like you're digging yourself. Once you lose the trial, it's gonna look even worse. And Dan and I have said before, like I'm not a big conspiracy theorist, you know? Like, no, I usually don't believe conspiracies, but this is the amount of reasonable doubt that they have is mind blowing. Mm-hmm. The only other piece of evidence they have is a hair. One of John's hairs, the guy that died on the back of her bumper, but that car was transported like an hour and a half in the snow. So like seriously that piece of hair stayed on the, so, and, and it's really sketch. That they have video of the cops around her car before those pieces were found and stuff like there's, there's just insanity. The biggest one is his injuries are not consistent with getting hit by a car. He has dog bites, scratches. He got the shit kicked out of him. Essentially, all of his injuries are like, he got. What, like there was an argument inside and Yeah. Hundred percent. And they think, I think they think the nephew of one of his friends did it. Like, here's the other thing that's fascinating is, and this is, you know, could mean nothing. They were testifying about like cell phone evidence and stuff. Oh God. Yeah. And uh, the, the whole group of people that were in this house, like all the cops and their wis up, they're cops and what they, none of them

### [5:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12s0JtOLkWI&t=300s) Segment 2 (05:00 - 09:00)

ever texted each other about like. I can't believe that he, alright, so if we all found some dead dude outside of our house, or like some dead dude died outside of our house while we were inside party the next, like I feel like I'd be texting you guys and be like, this is insane. Like, I can't believe this. Well, the other thing is they didn't text at all about anything. Almost like, here's what is the prosecution's argument. I, I don't, he's that Karen hit him, but Yeah. But, but I'm saying based off what the taillight, what, what taillight's gonna shut. Yeah, that's, that's what, that's the whole point. It's like there's no way, there's not reasonable doubt. So here's the other thing too, is that. All of those people that were in the house, one female Googled, she spelled it wrong, but how long to die in the cold? Oh, yeah, yeah. Then they all called each other at a certain point, but here's the best. They all testified they were butt dials. Like each of them had four separate butt dials where this happened, where this happened. That's crazy. And then they all destroyed their phones. I guess they're the one cop the like that was at there. He wasn't a cop investigating it, but he was a cop. Like I think it wasn't his house, but the whatever the head investigator was talking shit about, he just destroyed this. SIM card in his phone and trashed it. There is so much like one of the investigators, maybe the lead investigators was talking shit about Karen Reed, like, you know, in her text. Is there any chance she gets acquitted and then they go after Shady? I don't know. I feel like it should be because it's so bad. Like he was saying, the lead investigator who's since been fired. Was sending text messages, like didn't get any nudes of her yet. She's hot. She has a nice ass, but she's like talking about the suspect. Mm-hmm. And like saying all this, there's video that was never released before that the one guy, Brian Higgins, one of the cops, went back to the police station and was doing really sketchy stuff and he claimed he was cleaning off cars. They now got the video. He wasn't cleaning off cars. Yeah. He went and got like a Faraday bag, which they're saying was like to h John phone bad. I think they're trying to cover for this. It's so bad. This family, you know, this guy's killing. Oh, and they rehomed. So he had what looks like dog by, if you saw his autopsy pictures mm-hmm. You would think he got the shit kicked out of him. And then a dog not consistent with a getting hit by your car. The people who owned the house ripped up the floor in their basement. Sold their house for 75,000 under asking price, got rid of their dog. Like, it's just so sketch, you know, like so obvious that he did something wrong. So also because oh, he's gonna, he's gonna do it all to know Judge Mercer. Oh wait, I have to, let me talk about one more thing. I have to correct this because I got like reamed on our page because I said the girl's name wrong. There was another girl, her name is Sandra Jen McCabe? No. Oh, she's bad. But Sandra Birchmore, her name was, she was 23 when she died. Apparently she started having an affair with a cop when she was 15. She was pregnant. Her death was originally ruled a suicide, and it turns out that cop actually murdered her. She was pregnant with his baby and she was being passed around with all these cops when she was literally just 15. The cops investigating her death. Same cops in this case. Wow. Same exact cops. Okay. How have I not heard? I don't know, heard this, I dunno if her name was, I heard anything about this. I'll say her name was Sandra Birchmore. Sandra b Birchmore. Sandra Birchmore. She was 50, so she was found dead in her Canton, Massachusetts apartment in 2021. She's been a subject of investigations and scrutiny. Oh yeah. Matthew Farwell. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. She was like a ri, she met him on like a ride along or something when she was like 15. What does that have to do with, with Karen was the same cops investigating her death? That rule did a suicide. Meanwhile, oh, they covered up for this cop who murdered her. Oh, well the cop and murder is, he got caught, he got convicted and everything too. But a lot of the same investigators mm-hmm. Were the same ones in the Karen Reed. He, it's like old boys, small town bullshit, it sounds like. But now I gotta tell you one more thing. There's this creator, she's so funny. I'll have to show you her clips later. She apparently has a business in Canton, Massachusetts, and the cops don't like her business or whatever, I don't know for whatever reason, but they've been ticketing her and doing all this sketchy shit. So like the big thing now was to expose Canton Police and there are craters everywhere showing all this bullshit that these cops have done. This is beyond a conspiracy theory. This woman was framed for this murder, you know, and had social media not been a thing, she might have gone to jail for his murder. Well, regardless of whether she was. Framed or Judge Mercer would like to rule. Did not judge Mercer. The honorable Judge Mercer Sledgehammer. Yeah. It's my gavel. I will rule that Karen Reed not guilty. Agreed. No matter if she did it or not. Like if the jury is doing their job, the jury's job is, if there's reasonable doubt, you can't convict them. There is, yeah, of course. So, so much reasonable doubt in this case that it's like. A, it's like more than reasonable doubt. Yeah. And so, I mean, that's all you need to know about the Karen Retrial not guilty. Thank you guys.

---
*Источник: https://ekstraktznaniy.ru/video/35739*