# AI and the Digital Divide: Will You Survive?

## Метаданные

- **Канал:** Paul McWhorter
- **YouTube:** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7eojEZGCYM
- **Источник:** https://ekstraktznaniy.ru/video/39317

## Транскрипт

### Segment 1 (00:00 - 05:00) []

Hello guys, this is Paul McQuarter with topteboy. com and we're here today to discuss AI and the digital divide and more importantly, will you survive? So, I'll need you to buckle up. pour yourself a nice tall glass of ice cold coffee and I'll need you to get ready to talk about what might very well turn out to be a very dystopian future. So what do I mean by the digital divide? I'm suggesting that very soon the world is going to be divided into two groups. Group one are the people that are driving the AI and group two are the people that are going to be destroyed by AI. It is very important for you to understand this and to position yourself to be on the right side of that transaction. Those driving AI will be the digital cowboys who are pushing it, steering it, developing it, and staying on top of it. Most everyone else is going to be destroyed by it. I'm not here today to tell you what's going to make you feel good. I'm not here today to tell you what you want to hear. I am here today to give you what I think is an accurate assessment of the near-term risks AI poses to your employment by understanding the threat. Hopefully you can prepare for it. So what I would like to discuss is who is in the most vulnerable position right now to be displaced by AI. And who I really believe that is I believe that is people working in cubicles. I believe that 80% of the cubicle workers today are in danger of losing their job in the next 18 months. What I'm going to suggest is anything that can be done by a human in a cubicle likely can be done better, faster, and cheaper by artificial intelligence. Now, the typ the system is typically kind of slow to realize and sort of slow to downsize, right? It's like you're going to be sitting there not being completely useful for a little while before they actually get rid of you. And so practically it might be that 20% of the cubicle workers will lose their job in the next 18 months, but I think within 5 years likely 80% will lose their jobs. Now government jobs are typically very bureaucratic and very slow to adjust. And so I think that government workers will probably cling to their cubicle jobs uh a lot longer than people in the private sector. But I think it's inevitable. I think that if you are working in a cubicle, it is very likely that your job is going to be in danger. And I think once it starts happening, it's going to happen very quickly. So I've talked about people in cubicles, but among people in cubicles, who will be displaced first? Okay. Who is going to be the first ones to begin to lose their jobs? This might surprise you, but what I'm going to say is the first people to be displaced by artificial intelligence will be the people using artificial intelligence. Okay? So, if you touch artificial intelligence, if you touch AI on the job, it is going to destroy you. And most people don't realize this yet because what I'm hearing people say and talk about is how AI is making them so much more effective and so much more efficient on the job. Well, what are they doing? They're taking the job that they were given. They're going over to AI and they're typing it in. And then they're getting the report written or the work done or the analysis done or the program written or the spreadsheet made by artificial intelligence and they feel good like thinking okay look how much more I'm getting done than I used to get done. Okay they think that they are more valuable because they can use AI. People think Notice I said use AI

### Segment 2 (05:00 - 10:00) [5:00]

not create AI, not drive AI, not develop AI, but use AI. Guys, you have to realize this. If you are having AI do your work for you, or if you're having AI help you do your work, it would be much easier for your boss to sit down and type the prompt into AI than to go tell you what he wants and have you type the prompt into AI. If AI is making you more effective and in your mind more valuable, what you don't realize is AI has just made you unnecessary. AI has made you obsolete because if you can type the prompt in, your boss could type the prompt in. Or if there's a job that he has 20 people doing, he could get rid of 19 of them and then have one person type the prompts in until he realizes that AI can come up with its own prompts and even that one is not going to be needed. Typing prompts into AI is not a longterm career strategy. There is no such thing as prompt engineering. Like I see this thing coming up on uh you know on YouTube and I see it coming all over the place. Ah be a prompt engineer. That's the future. Be the guy that sits and types the prompt in. Guys, AI can create its own prompts. What you can do is you can just give the whole job to AI and it will figure out how to best do it and it can figure out all the different parts. And I'll give you some examples of that in a minute. Okay. The other thing I want to say is professionals are not safe either. It is not just the clerical people that are going to be displaced, but the professionals displaced. I think most vulnerable are going to be the coders, those guys who write the computer programs, because I have just been amazed and I'll be honest with you, shocked how quickly AI is able to develop very sophisticated and very advanced code. And that AI can write code that would have taken me a month or two to figure out and it can give me the solution in 10 seconds. Does that make me feel good? No, it doesn't. secure? No, it doesn't. That makes me feel what? Vulnerable. Because all the skills that I developed in coding, now an AI can do quicker, faster, cheaper, and better. If you're using AI to help you write your code, you're likely going to be out of work very, very soon. So, I think coders right now are probably the most vulnerable. Next up, accountants are not safe. Okay, Did you know that the US IRS code, the tax code, is 17,000 pages long? How many accountants do you think are even familiar with 10% of that content? AI can have complete and perfect command of the tax code. Okay, let me give you a personal example that I had recently some years ago. You know, I do a little investing here and there on Erade. You know, I have a little ER Erade brokerage account and I bought a certain security and okay, no big deal. I bought it, I held it, I didn't sell it. And so I didn't think of anything of it being a very big deal. And then I just randomly found out this year that it there are certain types of securities that if you buy them, you have to file a certain form with the IRS. And if you don't file that form with the IRS, you will find yourself in non-compliance. You'll find yourself possibly owing fines and penalties and all types of stuff like that. Who would have knew? I just bought the GP YX or whatever and then all of a sudden I find out that just by clicking by buy that security I could be in trouble with the IRS. Okay. So, seeing that I needed to get that straight and get everything cleaned up and take care of that, I contacted my accountant. The accountant had never heard of it and the only reason the accountant knew was because I told her, "All right, so then she said, "Okay, I'll go away and look into it. " So, she went away. She came back about two weeks later and she says, "Yes, I was right that there was this

### Segment 3 (10:00 - 15:00) [10:00]

requirement. It's generally not known and then this is how you clean it up and this you how you get things taken care of. " Okay. She charged me $2,000 over this silly little stock trade that I had made some years ago. She charged me $2,000 to do the research. Okay. Then I was looking at her solution. I think, okay, what do I do? I go to AI and yeah, she'd kind of gotten things figured out, but she didn't really get it nailed down completely. So, what I had to do is first of all, AI for free gave me a much better solution than the professional CPA did. And then in the end, I had to feed her the right answer from AI. Now, I didn't say, "Hey, I looked up on AI. " I said, "You I was researching this and I was looking. It seems like what you're saying is good, but to really completely nail it down and make everything squeaky clean, we need to not just A, but we need to A, B, and C. And she looked at it and she says, "Okay, yeah, I see what you're saying. So, we'll do that. " What value did I get from that $2,000? Okay. Now, am I criticizing this person? No, I'm not criticizing them. But can an individual really have command of 17,000 pages of documents? And what I would say is no. Well, what you could say is, oh, well, the the accountant should be using the AI. But really, at that point, why if the accountant is having AI do my taxes, why do I need the accountant? Why don't I just have AI do my taxes? So you see even a professional is very vulnerable and what you can see is there's uh there's a lot of hesitancy still I think as humans we like to deal with live humans but man it's just like nobody knows 17,000 pages and AI has complete perfect command of it. So you know uh accountants are not safe. Let's look at another one. Lawyers. Okay, you think 17,000 pages of regulations are hard. Imagine the legal system. Now you're talking about millions and millions of pages. Now, I as an individual sitting here, you know, making YouTube videos right now, I'm not having to deal with lawyers a lot, but when I had a Silicon Valley high-tech company, you know, probably a quarter of my time was spent with lawyers because everything is you're developing business strategies. You've got to get legal strategies and intellectual property strategies and defending your intellectual property. And then this issue with this, a lot of my time as an executive was spent with lawyers. Now, this is what I learned about lawyers. When you hire a lawyer, that lawyer never really does any real work. What that lawyer does is he knows who is experts in different areas and then he goes and then he gets the lawyer that he knows is actually an expert in that area and then that lawyer does the work. But then he usually needs to get another lawyer. So you have these chains of like two or three or four lawyers that are referring work to different specialists. It gets really expensive and that's when all the guys are on your side. Now when you have lawyers on the other side then you know it goes back and forth and it gets even more expensive. But really, it's about knowing a huge amount of information, which people, even though they're intelligent, you only have so much capacity for so much data. So these lawyers, they cram as much information as will fit in one brain. And then to solve any given problem, you have to get two or three or four or five different lawyers to have the expertise in the different parts of what your problem is. And wow, you know, I've even like I don't have, you know, I'm not doing legal things, but you see like I'll get a certain, you know, sometimes I'll get a certain document or something and I'll have AI look over it and it'll say, you know, these guys are trying to get you to do this, scratch it out, and send it back to them. Give me like really good advice, say, I scratched that part out, I signed it and sent it back. And they took my scratch out. They said, okay. And they signed it, initialed the initial the scratch out. So I'm even finding that uh today you can things that maybe you would have not had a not been able to afford a lawyer to look at. You can get some pretty good advice from AI. Now if you have a situation go to a real lawyer have your taxes done accountant. I am not suggesting that you don't use an accountant. I'm not

### Segment 4 (15:00 - 20:00) [15:00]

suggesting that you don't use a lawyer, but it is inevitable people are going to start doing that and then systems are going to emerge that are minimal human and maximally AI and that is going to mean that 90 to 99% of the accountants are not going to be needed. 90 to 99% of the lawyers are not going to be needed and that is going to be a major displacement. So we get rid of all the clerical people out of the cubicles. We start whacking back on bookkeepers and clerks and recordkeepers and then all the way up to not needing nearly so many accountants. Now the legal system is going to be very much gutted because AI can do most of that stuff better and I'm even going to say this doctors are not safe. Okay. Now they'll and the reason is again if you look at the knowledge of medicine it is millions and millions of documents and four years or whatever in medical school they're just trying to cram as much information as possible into the brain. But there is no way that a given doctor can know that there's this subtle thing that it could be instead of the thing that he thinks it is. He does not have, no matter how smart he is, no matter how good of a guy much you like him, he cannot have in his brain as much information as you know as what AI can have command of. And so absolutely, you should never use AI as your doctor. Absolutely, you should go to a doctor and you should do things by the book. Okay? But me, I'm kind of like a an Indian that doesn't like to stay on the reservation. Okay? So I do things differently, but I'm a horrible example. You should never follow me as an example. This isn't medical advice. You should never do this. Use me as a bad example. But here's what I have learned that if I have symptoms, I can type them into AI and it'll say it could be this, it could be this. And sometimes it's pretty serious stuff. Like if you have like all of the sudden a sudden onset of pain in your side. It could be something as simple as indigestion or it could be uh a gallbladder a kidney stone. ruptured appendix. It could be some very life-threatening things. Okay. But what I found is I can type in to AI these are my symptoms. And then it comes back and says it could be this, it could be this. You need to go to the doc, lab and you need to get this this test. I can go to the lab. I can get this this test and then I can upload those things to AI and then AI can go come back and tell me, okay, I think it's this, I think it's this. Now, for doctors, doctors are going to be kind of protected initially by the cabal. Okay, that there are regulatory things that are put in place that very much scare people into never thinking about their own health. It scares them into never thinking about what might be causing this symptom that they're having. They're trained and they're frightened until you run to the doctor and then he looks at the symptom. He gives a name to what's causing that symptom and then he sends you to the pharmacy to get a prescription for that. And that is really locked down. It's locked down legally, okay, that you can't interact with the pharmacy without going through the doctor first and then you are frightened into never thinking, "Wow, I wonder why my stomach hurts so much. Hm. Do you think it could be because I'm eating eight donuts before I go to bed? " You see, that question never gets asked. It's always go to the doctor, find out what the name is associated with your symptoms, and then go get the pills. Okay? Now, I'll tell you, you should always do that because that's the way to do it. You should never ever think about using AI as a doctor. But again, as a guy that kind of gets off the reservation a little bit, this is what uh you know, I did. My wife is in a very serious medical condition. It's called congestive heart failure. And congestive heart failure is where your heart beats, but it doesn't really pump very well. And so, it's a very, very serious medical condition. And we basically, you know, have a cardiologist, and we went to the cardiologist. And then there is a

### Segment 5 (20:00 - 25:00) [20:00]

thing with heart condition called the probnp. It's sort of like a measure of the progression of your heart failure and sort of like you can kind of look at it going up and plot like okay it's here over time it's here and when it gets to here I'll be dead and you can kind of draw the line and it's sort of frightening. Okay. So the probnp is an indication of the progression of your heart failure. And so we did the you know the uh cardiologist route and what he was doing was that progression of the probn. He was kind of trying to flatten the curve where it didn't keep going up. And so I sat down with AI and I started asking questions. And then all of the sudden this s sort of problem that we were struggling with the cardiologist was struggling with the with the pharmaceuticals. I ask well how can I do this? How can I change this parameter of the heart without changing heart? You know sort of like how do I drop beats per minute without impacting blood pressure? He gave me an herb that was growing out in my garden. We went out and got it. She started having a tea twice a day. Within two weeks, it was just like this amazing turnaround in her heart condition. And so for about a year of being on going to the cardiologist, but following up with some interesting little lifestyle tidbits from AI, her probnp, which is like the higher the probnp, the closer you are to dying, her probnp instead of going from 2200 and edging up, it went from 2200 down to 900 with 300 being normal. Wow. just by having some tea out of the garden. Okay, but that's an example of what you should never do. You should always go to the cardiologist and do exactly what he tells you to do. But there's going to be more and more Indians like me who don't like staying on the reservation. Okay? And you might be able to keep me from going into a pharmacy and buying a pharmaceutical without talking to the cardiologist. You might not be able to do that. But there nothing keeps you from going out and ordering some herbs off Amazon or growing getting some stuff out of your garden. Okay? Now that is something that you should never do. You always go to your cardiologist. You always do exactly what he tells you. But there are going to be more and more Indians like me were going to be leaving the reservation. And while the doctors and the medical system have these regulatory protections that are going to kind of keep them being the only game in town, you just can't have such an inefficient when an efficient system is there and available. So, what's going to happen is I think that what we're going to see is someone like Walmart or Amazon or maybe a new high-tech startup is going to realize the inefficiency of the present medical system and it's going to work within the present regulatory framework to offer streamline medical services with minimum humans and AI forward systems. You could go into Walmart and a little booth where you were interviewed by an AI asking you about your s symptoms. Hey, I want to tell you something. Doctors don't touch anymore. Have you noticed that? Like when I was a kid, you would go in and they would poke and they would feel and they'd be doing this and they'd put their stethoscope and they would listen and then they'd go on your back and they would listen. Have you ever noticed that doctors don't touch you anymore? They come in, they ask you your symptoms, they s well, first of all, you come in and the nurse takes your blood pressure, takes your temperature, measures your weight, measures your uh, you know, measures uh, your height. You don't need a doctor. I could tell you, you know, when you go to the doctor, you need to have your blood pressure, your heart rate, your temperature, your height, and your weight. Okay? So, that's known. All right? Then you go into the doctor and he listens to your symptoms. And then what does he do? He sends you down the hall to a lab to get lab work done. And then in his mind, there's these symptoms which led to these tests and then these tests map onto these pharmaceuticals. It's like a matrix.

### Segment 6 (25:00 - 30:00) [25:00]

It's just absolutely a data matrix. Symptoms lead to test. test lead to treatments, pharmaceuticals. And that is the exact thing that AI will be doing much better than what a doctor can do. All right? And so what you're going to do is you're going to have these AI forward systems that are able to comply with the regulatory framework to where maybe the initial interview is done by AI. Then you go down and you get your testing done. Then the AI looks at that and then the AI has a report and that report then uh gives a treatment protocol suggestion and then that little summary goes to the medical doctor who just looks at it and signs it off because he knows that the AI is smarter than he is. Okay, So while the regulatory framework is protecting the doctors right now, I think that probably you're going to find yourself with 10 times too many doctors and so doctors are not safe. So I'm looking for places like Amazon, Walmart, Costco, just like remember how there used to be a cabal associated with funerals and then all of a sudden I think it was it Costco or Walmart? I think maybe it was Costco that started offering like really cheap caskets and there were like these streamlined like radically cheaper uh funeral options for people. I think that same thing is going to happen in the area of lawyers, accountants and in the area of doctors. So no one is safe. If you're in a cubicle, you're really in a dangerous situation. cubicle work can almost always be done better by AI. Okay? If you're using AI to do your job today, then your customer could use AI just as easily as you're using the AI. And I'll kind of give you an example there. Like one of the first things that kind of happened in the last few months was all of the sudden AI could generate just incredible graphics like graphic arts. It could generate an image like if you look at this uh AI image here of the Leviathan that's destroying the cubicle workers, right? If you look at that, how much would that have cost two years ago to have that made? Probably a,000 to $5,000 to have a graphic made like that. And now you can have it done on AI for just uh you know, for nothing. And initially it's like the graphic artist, oh wow, look how effective I am. I can do way more than what I could do before. But then all of the sudden the advertising agency, the marketing agency, they realize they can type those prompt in too. So all the sudden you started having graphic artists being displaced because you could simply do it without them. And now you've got the marketing firm or the publicity firm or the whatever the business firm that you know kind of helps you get your product to market. They're feeling really good because they just got rid of their art department and now charging the same thing. They have a huge profit because they were able to get rid of all these people. Okay. But me as the guy developing a business, all of a sudden I think, huh, let me just try this AI. And I actually did this as just an example. I was saying, okay, I have an idea. You know, I live near Cepi Falls. And CPI Falls is one of the most beautiful places on Earth. It's on Mount Elggon. There's this incredible waterfall and in the midst of the waterfall these people grow coffee and you can go up there and you can get the the raw coffee beans very cheaply and they are like one of the really worldclass coffee beans. So I said, "Hey, I want to develop a coffee company and here's my scenario. " It came up with the marketing plan. brochures. It came up with the taglines. It came up with the graphics. It's kind of like it was giving me a complete ready torun idea for a business. This is how you export. market. This is where you go. It did the whole thing that a marketing agency would have done, but it did it in 10 seconds. And it even gave me the design, the image to be used on the coffee package. It was incredible. Now, I'm an old guy and I'm not that interested in starting a coffee company at this point in my life, but I thought, you know, I would be able to do this. This is like really a this is really a good idea. But like I say, I

### Segment 7 (30:00 - 35:00) [30:00]

am not interested I am not interested in starting a coffee company at this point in my life. But now the implications for the future are really huge. there's going to be a huge displacement of the majority of the population into unemployment and nothing to do. And now you have all of these people that are unemployed, have nothing to do. And so then what does the world look like if half or 80% of the western population is unemployed, unemployable, and has nothing to do? Well, there's these guys like you've probably heard of the World Economic Forum, and it's a group of these elite people who think that they should run the world. Okay? It's like they've kind of appointed themselves to run the world. And there's this this verbiage that is coming out of them. And the thing that I keep hearing and you know I go back I look at the original documents. Yes, this guy is World Economic Forum and yes he did say this thing but there's this thing emerging of you will own nothing and be happy. And with this happy is this idea of this universal basic income that everybody is going to kind of get a stipen. Everybody's going to get a token, going to get tokens, and then they're not going to own anything, but they're going to be happy. And so, kind of the idea is like you get up in the morning and you, you know, you take some tokens and you can go down to the Starbucks and you can have the robotic barista, the automated coffee machine give you your coffee and then the robo taxi will take you back home. You know, you're not going to own a car, but you'll get a few tokens to take you down to Starbucks. You can come home, you can have your uh coffee. Now again, you call Uber, but there's not going to be any Uber drivers. Uber is going to be self-driven. You know, it's going to be the self-driving taxi. So, there's not going to be anybody working in the Uber. There's not going to be anyone working in the Starbucks, but you can have your coffee. Now, when you get home, you're going to find you still got your Netflix, okay? pornography. you still got your intoxicants, right? You're going to be able to get whatever intoxicants you want. And so, anything from, you know, to distract your mind from the fact that you've kind of ended up in a totally meaningless and trapped and fake life. And so, you're going to have things to stimulate your brain. So, you'll get all that entertainment. There'll still be all the video games that you want, but your world is going to be in a pod, in a cocoon, and it's going to be centered on your screen, and then intoxicants. And then maybe you can get out and do a few small things in the real world. And that I've kind of made it sound ridiculous, but when it's presented in the right way, hey, yeah, I'd love to get up, have Uber drive me to Starbucks, have that, then go get my sandwich, this, that, go back. It sounds like this utopian type of existence. But then you're going to have to realize is those tokens that come with the universal basic income that is going to be if you maintain yourself as a compliant citizen. Okay? And so very soon what's going to come with the universal basic income is your social score. And you're going to very much have to tow the official narrative, right? You're going to narrative. And there's not going to be any room for independent thought or in uh expression. And why can they do that? Because you depend on your tokens in order to eat and in order to get your digital entertainment or distractions and things like that. And in order to get your intoxicants, you're going to at that point be completely controlled. Now with that, so first of all, you're going to own nothing. And I'm not the one saying this. I'm just telling you what I'm reading in the documents. Number one, you're going to own nothing and be happy. Number two, you're not going to have to work because you'll get a universal basic income. So, you don't have to be worried about that job that you don't uh don't have anymore. And then the third thing that I notice is this emergence that is coming out of these organizations like the World Health Organization, the World Economic Forum, all of those types of things is this emergence of this fascination with worms as food. Now this is the argument if I understand it right. If I don't, please correct me down in the comments. But the problem appears to be and our survival appears to depend on correcting the problems of cows have flatulence and

### Segment 8 (35:00 - 40:00) [35:00]

that flatulence is poisoning the world with CO2 and it's going to lead to this catastrophic failure of the world because the cow has flatulence and therefore you as a good surf should not be eating red meat. You get worms. That's what I started these worm burgers. So, you see this digital divide. There's those over here who are going to fly their private jets to Davos. There's these over here who are the elite, the entertainers, the important people, the corporate executives. They're going to live over here. and you are going to be over here eating worms. It's kind of like the old George Carlin. Uh I can't remember. Yeah. Is his name uh Carlin? Okay. It was the old comedian saying, you know, it's one big club and you ain't in it. And that's kind of that's the sort of thing that I see uh developing that you're going to own nothing. You're going to be happy. controlled by your social score so that you can get your universal basic income tokens. And then this emergence with this fascination of worms as food. And so suddenly we are supposed to be eating worms and only the elect can be eating the real beef. Okay, now this is where it really gets crazy. It's just like I'm not making this stuff up and I'm not getting it off of YouTube videos. These are in the documents and these are from presentations from the world economic forum and from papers I've read from those people. Now this is the amazing thing that there is now the emergence of this tick that is called the lone star tick. And if you get bit by the lone star tick, he transmits to you or can transmit to you this illness called alpha gal syndrome. Alpha Apha- G syndrome. Look it up. Now in the last 10 years there has been a 100fold increase in cases of AGS. 100fold increase in 10 years. Now, what is it that alpha gal syndrome does? When you get bit by the tick and you get alpha gal syndrome, you become allergic to beef. If you go eat a steak, all of the sudden you get really, really ill. Now, it's primarily beef, but to some extent it's all red meats, the allergy. And for some people they become allergic to any meat. Now isn't that convenient. Okay. Now there is a paper by these couple of professors from Western Michigan University and the paper is by Crutchfield and Herth. Crutchfield just like it sounds. Herth er Crutchfield and Herith have this paper and what the paper is called beneficial blood sucking. And they are describing this AGS illness as possibly a moral bioenhancement. It's something good that is happening because people are getting sick and they can't eat meat anymore and therefore there won't be as many cows much cow flatulence. So it's a really good thing that you've got this exponential rise in this AGS syndrome that is leading people to be allergic to beef, pork, and other meats. And they are even suggesting, you can go read the paper and you can tell me if you think I'm wrong in reading it this way, but it seems like that they are suggested that this maybe should be juiced a little bit that maybe we could see if we could build this up a little bit and maybe it could be intentionally spread as a moral bioenhancement because there's like something in there. Somebody was saying, I don't not sure if it was these two guys or somebody else that was talking about these two guys and what it was suggested is there's always going to be this guy that's saying, "Oh, you know, I know I shouldn't be eating beef, but oh man, those steaks are so juicy. "

### Segment 9 (40:00 - 44:00) [40:00]

And then he'll go have one. Well, to help that guy, he needs the AGS, so he would never even think about eating meat anymore. Okay. So, I guess uh I guess now I sound like a completely insane and crazy person. So, I should start by saying number one, I believe the earth is round. Okay, I've you know I worked on satellite. I worked on imagery. I sent uh instrument packages to the edge of space in our high altitude balloon program. I have built satellites. I have I was part of developing the original chips that went into the GPS system. The global GPS system was first a military system and I worked in developing some of those radiation hardened chips for that original system. So, so I believe that the earth is round. Okay. I believe that we sent man to the moon. I believe that. I'm absolutely convinced the world is round and we sent people to the moon. But beyond that, it's like I stop and think about anything that I'm being told because it just seems like more and more it's like, you know, you're going to own nothing and be happy and you're going to have a social credit score and if you behave yourself then you'll get your universal basic income. And so it's like I don't like that. I don't like things that way. So where are we now? As they say, there is a I don't know if you saw that. It was a uh wasp, but he went his way. That's good. Where are we now? As they say, which way now, Western man? And I really believe that we're on the precipice. Okay, very big changes are happening very quickly because of artificial intelligence. They're going to start hitting hard and at an individual level really quickly. And like I say, I warned you. I'm not here to make you feel good. tell you what you want to hear. I'm here as an analyst saying what I see. Got to repeat myself. Go to your doctor. Go to your lawyer. Go to your accountant. I'm not saying that you shouldn't do those things, but I'm saying there are going to be people who start bypassing the system and doing things their own way. There will be those people who do that. So, I've kind of described the problem for you, but I'm just opening this up as a discussion. You guys leave a question down below. You're crazy. You're insane. Get back and just start talking about Arduino and start talking about all this crazy stuff, you know? get back and teach your Arduino lessons and that sort of stuff. So, I understand that this is meant to be a dialogue, a discussion. I'm happy if you guys want to tell me I'm crazy. me, well, it's this way, but not that bad. This should be a dialogue. And I hope that you guys will dialogue down in the comment section. Now, this is the question. And if some of you guys think what I'm saying is like maybe this guy makes sense, let me know if you want to make me if you want me to make another video of what you should be doing now to protect yourself from this dystopian future. What should you be doing now career-wise? What if you're one of those guys in the cubicle? What should you be doing now? If you're one of those guys that maybe is uh you know sort of one of those midlevel lawyers that's doing okay but just doing a bunch of kind of uh mundane work you know turning the crank and you see yourself as maybe possibly being displaced. If you see this as a potential threat and you want me to make another video of okay now what? Now what do we do to protect ourselves? Tell me. And if this video just made you mad you can tell me no. don't make the second video. But leave a comment down below and let me know. Guys, this has been kind of like the craziest video that I have ever made on YouTube. And like I say, I'm not a Yeah, I'm I mean, I really I think we went to the moon. I think the Earth is round. You know, I've worked as a engineer in some of the top uh top positions in the country. And you know, I'm a scientist and a researcher and all of that. And it's just like I just wanted to share with you what I'm seeing as an analyst of what I see happening with this artificial intelligence. And so you guys leave a comment down below. Let me know what you think. Do you want to see that second video? Okay guys, this has been a long video. I'll let you guys go. Paul McQuarter with topteboy. com. I will talk to you guys later.