# Peace Negotiations Fail, Sell Off?

## Метаданные

- **Канал:** TheChartGuys
- **YouTube:** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYF61ym4UxU
- **Дата:** 12.04.2026
- **Длительность:** 33:21
- **Просмотры:** 1,060
- **Источник:** https://ekstraktznaniy.ru/video/45823

## Описание

After the US and Iran agreed to a ceasefire, buyers put together a huge bounce but stalled at the value area low of the all-time high supply. Now that the peace negotiations over the weekend have failed, will sellers force daily retracement? If so, what do they need to get done to create meaningful damage?

Our goal is to offer actionable information to help traders of all skill levels to make better market decisions. We provide a weekly overview of the market, analysis of key sectors, regular trade ideas, and updates to trade ideas throughout the week. Swing trading specific educational videos are also made available to subscribers. Take a free tour of the report here https://www.chartguys.com/swingreport

0:00 Intro
0:21 $SPY #spy
7:10 $QQQ #qqq
9:40 $IWM #iwm
10:43 $DIA #dia
12:52 $DXY #dollar
14:28 $GLD #gold
15:34 $NVDA #nvda
17:57 $BTCUSD #bitcoin
19:11 $CCJ #uraniumstocks
20:13 Key Concepts and Trade Review

🚀 Learn Technical Analysis with our FREE course!  https://www.chartguys

## Транскрипт

### Intro []

The ceasefire between the US and Iran led to a big old bounce back to the valuary low of the all-time high supply. But peace stocks have kind of fallen apart here over the weekend. So, will sellers enter the market? And if so, what do they need to get done in order to create meaningful damage? My name is Lamont, full-time trader, part of the Truck Guys team where I head up our F futures room and the swing report. In

### $SPY #spy [0:21]

this video, we'll go over all that and more. So, let's get into it. Okay. So again, massive bounce. Even before that news dropped, there was already some indication that the selling was not terribly strong because on Monday's open, it was a relatively high open, right? And continue to bounce, made for a new high, stalled here, right? So this was their first objective was to negate this breakdown. And then the next day, the sellers had a weak open, pressed lower, and could not get here. They could not get back to the valued area high of this next reference structure that we're using. This is the reference structure that buyers have are currently bouncing out of right now. So to fail to touch down on his point of control on the uh Thursday from two weeks ago and then on the Tuesday session to not touch down on the value area high of that structure was indicative of weak selling. Um then obviously the news drop we got a massive gap and this gap you know typically on a such a large gap you would expect there to be some gap fill. a gap and hold and some gap fill. And then how much gap fill you get is always pretty indicative of how strong the selling is. And this gap fill was not very strong at all. You'll notice that the low of the day was pretty much a failure to get back down to the low of the all-time high supply. So now going forward, this becomes our key reference, right? These buyers now, their objective is to get back over 68782 to affirm this structure as demand, which would then have them position well for new highs. are barely off the highs right now. But because a lot of this move was based on the ceasefire essentially, you know, the uh the probability needle, so to speak, started shifting more towards peace um was what fueled a lot of this bounce. Now that the negotiations have kind of fallen apart here, I think we likely see some retracement in the next week. And you know just as a reminder right we spoke about this many times before when it was the tariff wars or whatever this is just how the new cycle has to work this is how anything has to work right like a bad thing occurs we have pessimism towards it then a potential solution presents itself right so when it was the tariffs it was tariffs are here that's bad selling and then it was okay uh potentially delaying the tariffs or they're going to be um exceptions or there going to be negotiations with other countries regarding the tariffs. Okay, that's good. Those negotiations break down. That's bad. Then we come to a resolution. That's good. It's just always like this. The markets just it's almost like bipolar or something, right? They're just always kind of um flipping between optimism and pessimism. So now obviously the thing is war with Iran or special military operations, whatever you want to call it. It's really the strait that we care about, right? Not so much the war. Anyway, um so we should expect this right now. The headlines in the near term are going to be negotiations not looking so good. Probably more forces being sent to the area and then okay, renewed discussions or whatever and then yada yada. This is just how it's going to be. So, you know, um you just kind of have to accept it, right? Just just nature of the market. And obviously we're kind of going through some notable, you know, some exceptional um volatility just due to uh the nature of our current geopolitical environment. Let's just call it that, right? Let's not get too political here because frankly we don't care about politics um in the chart, guys. So anyway, um what should we care about now? Right? We should care about this as the upside reference and we have two very clear downside references. It's the high of the 911 to 1023 structure. The buyers, if they want to pick up where they failed over here, right? Remember what their job was here. Their job here was to hold over this structure and then continue to press the advance. They failed to do that on this breakdown. So, now that we have gone back into testing the uh all-time high supply, their goal is to get back to affirming the breakout over this guy by holding over 67395. Their secondary goal is to just keep staying in here to negate the breakdown under the all-time high supply, which would be holding over 67120. And you'll notice that the low of Wednesday's session was pretty much a hold of 67120. The low of Thursday's um 67395. So, the market is very much telling us, okay, these are our key references that we should be mindful of. And then you'll notice the stalling was pretty much right at the value area low of the all-time high supply. So, um, again, I would imagine that sellers will enter the market next week, but if they can't take out these two levels, for sure, we'll know it's not terribly strong. And even if they can take out these two levels, really, if we can hold over 662. 76, I would still think that that's relatively healthy, right? Because retracement, that wouldn't even be retracing half of this move. If you were to retrace back to here, that would be pretty much right on the 382 to the dot. Um, not to the dot, but very close. Off by what, like a buck or so, 50 cents. No. Uh, yeah, about a buck. Um, so wait, no, it's uh it would pretty much be right on the uh breakdown level here. So, that is uh that's really it. So, again, next week we'll probably see a retracement. If they can't get under here, back to breaking down under 661. 36, not a big deal. Like if we just consolidate sideways here, I honestly think that would be fine. Now, bigger picture, we could be looking at a just a massive range now, right? Because now that we've seen this lower low that can follow through. we didn't get back to the 2025 high. There's the potential that we just get back to being a hot mess here chopping around maybe something more similar to like this 2022 low or even this um 2021 area where we just spent, you know, the better part of a year um just kind of hanging out going sideways. So, buckle up. I think uh yeah, I think it's going to be a pretty choppy market in the near term, but we'll see. Maybe I'm wrong. Hopefully, I'm wrong. Maybe this is just a monthly higher low that just been we'll set ideally and then we'll just see higher highs maybe. Um or we'll reject from this all-time high supply, take this guy out, and then we're looking right back down here. All right, so that's pretty much it. I think we have a trade zone set up for a sell. I still stand by it. You know, who knows if it's uh if these sellers will play defense here, they should play some initial defense here. And our first objective is really just to get back to the value area low of this structure here. I think on the way down though would be reasonable to take some partial profits before that test like a 1. 5 hour chop here at this point of control. But ultimately I think that if you do reject from this all-time high supply they should probably try to test the lows of this range which would make that value area low a pretty reasonable target for

### $QQQ #qqq [7:10]

that cell. Um all right so moving on to the Q's here. So the Q's again big old bounce and very similar to the spy we had like early indications the selling was not terribly strong. Right? So over here the buying was not very strong. they could not negate this breakdown under 59133, the breakdown from this local supply. Um, but then on Thursday, you have this week open and you move all the way back down to low and behold this breakdown area 57854, right? The low was 578. 40. So, it breaks by like 14 cents and then it bounces. Um, again, just letting us know that the selling wasn't terribly strong in this moment. Maybe, you know, perhaps people already knew about the potential spot. I don't know. Either way, big old gap testing this value area now. I mean testing this um key supply zone two days where the high of the day was pretty much right at the value area high and then the low of the session on Friday was pretty much again right at that value area high. So the market again is telling us that okay we really very much care about this um reference here right the overnight session the high was also right at this value area high so I think keep using this as a reference it's pretty much the only reference that makes sense at this point so it's pretty clear upside objective 61752 we don't really need that right now downside objective 59886 first and then five and then 59133 if the sellers can't get us back down under this valued area low 59886 we'll know it's not terribly all because that means that they're failing to move value lower relative to this prior supply now acting as demand. And if they can't get back under 59133, then they don't get back to affirming this breakdown, which again would be weak selling. So that's how we're going to know if these sellers mean business is if they can take these two levels out next week. I think we have a very similar trade zone for the Q's. Um, by the way, I don't suggest you do both. Like if you're going to hit this trade on the spy, then you probably don't want to do it on the Q's. there's just too much um correlation there. So, just pick one. Uh I still again I think it's very reasonable to be looking for these sellers here. I would imagine even, you know, if there was no news at all, I would I would imagine that these sellers would look to play at least some initial defense here with the uh trade not trade um I guess it's kind of a trade discussion with the peace deal peace negotiations kind of you know not getting anywhere over the weekend. Uh I would imagine that this you will probably have some ability to take some profit off of the this uh sell. And this is essentially looking for a potential uh weekly lower high. It's not that much space for it. Um, but yeah, I still stand by it. And if it doesn't work, you

### $IWM #iwm [9:40]

know, what can you do? And they're not always going to work. Um, all right. So, moving on to the rut here. So, for the rut, again, very clear, right? The market again telling us that these key levels are very important. The low of the gap on Wednesday, pretty much right at the uh value area low of the all-time high supply. And then, you know, the high of this session again right off the area high. You can clearly see how much activity there was right at the value area hand right at the point of control of this reference structure. So what do we care about next week? 26336. If buyers can find acceptance over that then it may affirm the all-time high supply as demand and their position will for new highs again because of the peace deal situation or the lack of one I think probably retracement. If we see a retracement under 25837 or rather if we don't we'll know that the selling is not terribly strong. And if we can't get back on the 2550, which is just the low of the all-time high supply, again, that selling would not be terribly strong. All right, think we had a trade zone in here too, but it already got to our target, right? Came into it, got to the target, stop off the rest, no harm, no foul. Probably a small win. And then

### $DIA #dia [10:43]

finally for the Dow here, uh the Dow again very large bounce. Did come back to back test the um major monthly breakout. All right, so it was here I think. Uh let me see make sure here. Yeah, we'll call it this guy. Right. So just held the back test of it and now a big old balance. Again, if we just consolidate in here over 45155, that's still constructive, right? That's still just a bunch of balance over where there was a lot of prior balance in the past. So um upside objective, we care about 48360. That's just the point of control of this uh key reference structure now. Prior supply, prior demand now acting as supply. And then we care about 48715 to see if the buyers can negate this breakdown to the downside 47673. And then really it's just this the value area high next. Right? So if the selling can't get back under 47673 we'll know it's not terribly strong. And if they can't get back under 4 uh 6844 again not terribly strong right? Essentially that would still be affirming all of this as demand this like two weeks or so of demand. We had a trade zone here as well which worked out quite well. This was that um play we were talking about for a long time. It was, you know, um a bit not aggressive per se, but it was we were looking to buy the relative weakness, right? Because it was a little bit more extended than the ES and the NQ and it was already back testing this major monthly um level. So, at this point now, if you use this uh trade zone, then you've ideally you've taken profits and you pull that lower bid, walk your stop up to over here, and then if we get something like this where the buyers create some demand and then break out again, great. then you can walk that stop up and then um you know essentially you're sitting pretty for a potential monthly higher low play. You don't even have to walk it up. Honestly, if you're playing for that to be a monthly higher low and that you're thinking we'll just go see higher highs, then don't even want to stop, you know, just leave it right there. And if we just absolutely dump on Monday, um just, you know, as like because this was a knee-jerk reaction, right, to the um uh ceasefire and potential peace discussions, um if we get like another kind of sucker punch kind of a deal, um and takes off this low, okay, great. Whatever. You still got a decent bounce play out of it. All right. So, moving on to the

### $DXY #dollar [12:52]

right. All right. So, moving on to the dollar again. and the dollar. You know, we should keep an eye on it, right? It matters. But, you know, like we haven't had to update this, right? As long as we're under this um structure here, which is what supported price throughout all of this balance and over this structure here, which is what's supporting price now through all this balance, um no change. So, I continue to affirm this these I continue to uh assert that these two trade zones very reasonable, right? So, they've already worked a bunch of times and if you hit it again again, I would wait. No, wait later until here uh where the volume kind of tapers off here around 97. 4 um in order to uh take some profits and then take another exit at the extremes of the range. If it gets there, it's already had so many round trips. I really think it's important to have a balance playbook, right? Because the market spends most of its time balancing, right? Just zoom on any chart, particularly dollar chart balance. All right, here's some trend. This is all balance. This is really all balance, right? Here's some trend balance. trend. You know, for the most part, the market spends time balancing. And if you capture a balance play and you align it with the bigger picture trend, then it could very easily become a um trend play as well, you know? So, they're not like two separate entities, you know? They're like they're kind of attached at the hip, right? These two things, they need each other. It's like Coke and Pepsi. Not the best analogy, but um it's like summer and winter. You need each other. Life and death, whatever. You need these two things or otherwise, one wouldn't exist. one can only exist if the other one exists, right? So anyway, um that's pretty much it for the dollar. Moving on to gold. So

### $GLD #gold [14:28]

for gold, uh if you recall what we discussed was where' it go was this, right? So I was saying, okay, listen, we're probably just doing balance here. And so if you are looking for a play in gold, it is reasonable to be buying a pass back over the development value area low, targeting the development point of control, and then just giving it a bit of wiggle room here. If your first exit was here, I think that would be okay as well. So then your risk should be look like that instead. Adjust your risk. But it basically we just want our stop somewhere under this low um when we're triggered into it based off of this development value area. If you're in from the GLD trade zone, then you're doing fine as well. And again, you're just waiting for some potential profit taken here. Um otherwise, this is just we're likely looking at this. something like this or something like this. Just some longer, bigger picture balance. Gold in particular spends a lot of time trading sideways. So after all of this range expansion, I wouldn't be surprised if we were now to spend some time just trading sideways here. All right, daily charts bullish, higher lows and higher highs. And really what these buyers care about is 4602. 645 to see if they can just keep affirming this local daily breakout. Excuse me.

### $NVDA #nvda [15:34]

All right, so MVDA notable failure. These sellers couldn't even get back down to this guy. I think, you know, recycling these plays on the pass back over the development value area low is kind of back on the table. Again, we'll have to see what happens, right? Like how much selling comes off of the back of these failed negotiations. Um, yeah, I personally, you know, didn't really think the negotiations were going to go anywhere anyway because like the what Iran wants is just unacceptable. So, it's obviously, you know, can't excuse me or excuse her. Um, you know, those terms are just there's no way we could accept that. Plus, I think troops are still being surged in the area. So, you know, to me it just seemed like kind of biting their time here. Um, I mean, you know, that's just my amateur armchair opinion. To me, it seems like it would make the most sense if we are forced to try to open the straight. You know, I kind of feel like it would be the island of Formulus makes the most sense. It's right across the uh water from the that major airport. I forget what it's called. Um, and then from there you could, you know, essentially ship in, fly in, you know, armor, boots, whatever to try to secure all of the area around the straight. I think that would make more sense than like a full-on ground. It makes no sense to do a full-on ground invasion, but um, we don't have the people, right? When we had when we did Iraq, it was like 300,000 troops and Iraq is like 20 to 30% the size of Iran if that. Um, we probably need like a million troops, you know, like to anyway, whatever. I digress. Um, I guess if the Gulf Coast countries, whatever. Just been thinking about it. Anyway, um, I think it's reasonable to be looking at this as responsive trade again. So like just like what we were talking about in these prior setups back to recycling this guy would really just you know balancing here. So bottom fishing off the lows of the range chopping up at the other side if you're more active trader buying the pass back over the development value area low and chopping up at the development valley area high makes a lot of sense. Worked again over here. Here's a failed one but I mean this is literally one failed setup out of what one two three four five six seven. So you know pretty high hit rate. Um and again this is a balance play right very helpful to have uh balance plays because again market spends most of its time balancing

### $BTCUSD #bitcoin [17:57]

Bitcoin so Bitcoin look at this right it could not be more clear what's happening right now it's very clear this is the key structure right now the buyers they're doing their best right they've defended the value area low they've prevented acceptance below the point of control of this major structure the sellers have tried many times to get back down to the value area low and so far they have not but the sellers Where are they playing defense? They're playing defense right off the high of the structure here. 73835. 57. Another rejection right off of that level. So going forward, what should we be mindful of? Can they start hooking up here? If these buyers can start holding over 67503. 29, I mean, they kind of are right now, right? They're not like um holding it in really clean fashion, but they are still defending it, right? And so if they can continue to defend 67503. 29, then it should just be further test of this guy. And I continue to maintain our trade zone. Still makes sense. Like, you know, it doesn't look good, but this still makes sense. Just bottom fishing off of this guy, and then looking to get back to test 80524. 56, which again remains this key um level because, well, they need to get back over that guy in order to uh negate this most recent breakdown. All right, so that's pretty much it. CCJ, man, I

### $CCJ #uraniumstocks [19:11]

really thought that would be the one, but um so far not. We can probably do a balance play here honestly, right? Like if we were to look at all of this as balance here, use our developing tool. Then we can look for plays on buying the passback over the diva. So that would have been here. Chop it up. Probably stop out here. Let me just measure it out. I'm not sure. This guy targeting this guy 1. 5. Actually, you would still be in it, right? So you chop it up, take half, and you're still in the runner. You could have reloaded it here, reloaded it here. Either way, I think these deval play is very reasonable on CCJ. In fact, this is probably something I'll look to get done because I'm kind of getting sick and tired of waiting for it to come back down here. Um, but we shall see. This is actually a very healthy consolidation on the weekly time frame right now. It's a weekly lower low that lack followthrough. So, the monthly time frame is looking for a potential monthly higher low if it can just break over the prior days uh prior month's high. All right. And then, oh, that's it. All right. So, on to trade review then. So, for trade review here, really solid week, but honestly, a lot of luck. A ton

### Key Concepts and Trade Review [20:13]

of luck came uh was, you know, I I just need to credit Lady Luck for a lot of um the successes of last week. So, for April 7th, uh April 7th, um I just sold the ENQ, passed back on the deep. So, the daily context was this, right? For ENQ on the 7th, we're looking at it like this. On the 7th was this day, right? So on the Monday, we failed to get to their primary objective, right? And then we had a week open on um Tuesday. So I was thinking, all right, uh maybe that's the rejection. If that's going to be the rejection from here, then they should try to get back to here. So I was looking to play for that. Um but I did I didn't, you know, didn't really get that much out of it. Um so we broke under the overnight low, right? And so you know, if these sellers are going to press the issue, remember it was a week open, right? We opened up here under the value area uh low of the prior day of the Monday. This Monday was this day, right? It was this failure here. And then we open under the majority of the session. So I'm thinking, all right, if these sellers mean business from here, they should take out the low. overnight low. And once they're under the overnight low, they that's the sellers having the most confidence, right? If the sellers can't get under the overnight low, then the cash market sellers are not strong. But they did get under the overnight low in a really meaningful fashion. So I was essentially just looking for a 15-minute lower high here right over here um here. Essentially just looking to play for this lower high after we broke down under this Monday's range. That's probably easier to see. So week open drill lower 45 minutes of press which is I talk about this all the time in these videos and our streams. That's typically what I like to see for a lower high play. Obviously I don't know if that lower high will be set and turn to a lower low. If it does turn into a lower low, I don't know that it's going to completely drill. I don't know. So, you take profit on the way, right? So, you play for that deepo failure. You sell this move back under the deep. Give it a little bit of wiggle room. Um, playing to get back to why was I playing get back to here. Hang on. I probably said it. Looking for a test of 24048 where volume picks back up. Oh, okay. So, it was like this. I was probably just looking at it like this. This session. Uh, well, I didn't. None of that had formed yet. So, if we just give it a second here to load. Yeah. So, here the volume picks back up over here. So, if I'm looking for a Deepo sell here against the overnight low, then I'm looking to take my profits from uh where the volume picks back up. That's it. Another way of looking at that is just where the Deepo was, but I was just using the eight and wanting to be a little bit conservative. Um, so I took that exit here and then chopped it up blah blah blah blah. And on this move, it almost takes me out. So, on this move up here, I was still in by a tick. I was responding to somebody else who got stopped out of a similar trade in ES uh Yaser, sorry. RIP. Um, so I chopped it up at the uh target where the volume picks back up. A lot of luck on that one. Sometimes that's just how she goes. I mean, sometimes you get stopped to the tick, sometimes you get saved by a tick. And then I was looking for more out at the DVL. So I take this exit here at the DV. I was looking for the exit above the DVA. U more out that should have said above, not about below the day and DVL. And I was looking at it for 008 just because I think eights are lucky. So I take that chop out and then over here eventually on this move I just stopped out at the uh pretty close to the you know u middle of the session there. And again that was just you know they they got here honestly if I should have been paying attention to this. I don't think I think I lost sight of this. I should have just taken an exit there, right? If not, like either wait for the second exit there or um just be like willing to stop out on like walk it down or something because that's a very major level. I should have been paying attention to that. Like this could have been a walk my stop down kind of a dealio to here and then take that one out and then uh that would have fine, but no biggie. So on the eighth I made a mistake here. I just kind of got complacent. So on the eighth, the context was this for the Dow, right? Here's the ETH. Here's the ETH was the big gap. So big gaps, normally what you get is a gap and hold. The odds of you seeing a gap and hold in a very large gap are very good. And so I'm thinking, all right, if we're going to be gap and hold, well, I want to still play with the side that's showing us the strength, which was the buyers, right? Because they cause a gap. So, okay, you put all that together. I want to go with the buyers. I'm thinking it's likely going to be a gap and hold. So what should we do? we should try to make a devout play, a development value area low play on the session. And so what I wanted to see though was uh another round trip for a devout play. I said that at 10 a. m. And so at 10 a. m. on the ETH is this big old gap. And I wanted to play against the development value area low. That's this blue dash line here, right? But I wanted to see a round trip first. I wanted to see buyers get all the way back up to the development value area high. And the reason for that is because if in order for me to have confidence that they're going to just keep holding sideways, we should see a test of the D. VA, D. VA. Just like that MV MVDA chart, right? The MVDA chart, you know, like this is what I want to see, right? If I'm going to be confident in bottom fishing off a DVL, I want to see us tag the D. VA many times very high. So, that doesn't happen. So, I just end up not doing anything um for this session. Although, I pointed out that it was like I made an error here, right? because I should have been I was too focused on the Dow because they have that initial relative strength. But if we pop over to the ES, ES made the round trip and then it gave us a pretty nice setup. So this one would be a stop. Call it for what it is, right? This one if we had tried here like that, try to get here first. Okay, that would be a stop. No problem. Uh eventually stop over here. This one you probably wouldn't do this one, right? Because the risk is just not good enough. Actually, it would be okay. So we could have done it right here. Any of these would have been good, but I just kind of lost sight of it. Honestly, it's also quite late in the day. So, at that point, I just kind of get occupied with other stuff. Um, particularly because my cat keeps pooping everywhere. Not keeps, he had five good days. But something I'm not blaming him. Something's going on with him. I got to take another visit to the vet like number vet visit 10 or so in the last month. Um anyway, so next day 49. Um again, very lucky on the 9th. Um okay, so for the 9th, what happened was here and the context is this. So here's the ninth, right? And I'm thinking, all right, we gapped up. We're going to open within yesterday's range. I'm looking for balance plays again, right? I still want to go with these buyers. I'm going to buy us long because the what's happening, right? We just made a major daily breakout. So, I'm trying to, you know, go with the momentum that price is moving right now on the higher time frame, which is the daily time frame. But we're opening up within yesterday's range. So, we're looking for a balance play relative to yesterday. So, we put all that together and it should look like this, right? So, I just bought the move back over the value area low over here. So, I saw this initial move up. They failed to get to the overnight low, which again is indicative of weak selling. Then on this move up, I try to grab a higher low. I bought this pass back over the value area low of the prior day. Right? So, I'm looking at for like this. We are here. And so, I'm thinking, all right, if we're going to balance relative to yesterday, then buying off the value area low and trying to get to here makes a whole lot of sense. Now, I kind of pansied out of this because we rejected from the low of the prior days uh opening range over here. All right. So, here's yesterday's opening range. We rejected from there. That kind of sus me out a bit. And this was the relatively weak name, which I acknowledge. Um, I acknowledge that it was the it's relatively weak, but I'm thinking balance is likely. Everybody else was much better on this day. So, on the on this day, the ES opened up much stronger, right? And uh never even came down to the it barely broke the value of your low. ENQ also opened up much stronger. The rut um opened up much uh not really much stronger in the rut, but still better. It already touched the point of control. And the Dow was showing us a lot of relative weakness, but I was thinking it would probably play some catch-up. and it actually did get some relative strength later. So, all of that was correct, but I just kind of let myself get sused out here. And this is something I've mentioned in the past before that it's like a it's still something that I think is always going to be kind of a challenge when like things look bad. You know, they can always look really bad, but you know, you should just stick with your levels more often than not. Um anyway, so I bought this uh passed back over the value yesterday's value area low looking for a test of yesterday's point of control and then I ended up just taking a chop at the div. a because I was again I was getting worried right that it just didn't look good like the dang that these buyers were unable to overcome yes the low of yesterday's opening range and then they were failing to get to the point of control so I thought maybe this relative weakness is just going to lead to the way down um so I chopped it up at the diva which you know certainly ruined my R multiple on that first exit but then I also just walk my stop up to make it tighter and then uh I did eventually get this second exit here which was that White pock exit, right? So, we got some news about um BB talking to Lebanon or Hezbollah. I don't know who he's speaking to. I know there's overlap there. Um but I don't I don't really know what the news was. Either way, um I popped it off, set the risk, and I said I would take another stab if it drop and pop if I got stopped out. I was saying I was going to take another stab drop and pop at the overnight low. Gave it a little bit of wiggle room and then like it took like an hour and a half, you know? I was just like getting kind of tired of checking in on the trade. Um, so I took half off and then I walked the stop up and then I took out more on this leg up at the depot say look newsy whatever and then the rest of these updates are just walking the stop up and I just walked it up based off of every single little structure that formed. Walk it up. Walk walked it up and then stop it out. Um, I walked it up under this guy, stopped it out here and this was an absolute monster um of a trade. So that was just very fortunate and uh I was looking for to test the um daily point of control. I was looking for that as my last exit. Um, but it just came just a little bit shy. So, unfortunately, I didn't get that exit and I just stopped out. Um, it was still a great stop, but you know, it's kind of a little disappointing. And then finally, this uh on Friday, I talked about this setup on the stream. Again, it's another deval setup. It's by now like there you can see the general trend, right? The daily context is this, right? We had a Whoops. The daily context is we're over yesterday's range. And so I'm interested in looking for devout plays because if we're going to just balance, right, if we're going to keep trending but not trend really hard, which has been the case in over the last two sessions, then again, bottom fishing off the diva makes the most sense, right? So I talked about that setup on our live stream. I was stream for a community on Fridays and it uh I missed it. I missed it while I was talking about something else um on the stream. I think it was this guy. So, I was talking about the setup. I was wrapping up and then this happened and I was like, "Okay, we probably missed it. " But I said during the stream, you know, probably sets up again. Um, so I ended the stream and then bingo bango set up really soon after that. So, I just bought that. Um, it was a little late, right? So, I, you know, it was I didn't get it at the low. I bought it on the pass back over the open, chopped it up at the div. a, chopped it up at the overnight high because again, if the buyers, cash market buyers can't get over the overnight high, then the cash market buyers are weak. So, you know, the idea is that there's the potential that they'll fail there. There's a good there, and they did. So, chopped it up, stopped out the rest, and then um that was it. There was no real setup into the end of the day. I mean, it wasn't bad like playing off of yesterday's point of control, the prior days point of control, I should say. But, you know, I was fine with just taking this uh pretty decent win as well. So, ended up being a great week, but again, it was very dependent on luck, I think, in my opinion, right? Like I don't who knows how this YM trade would have worked out if not for that news. And um if that ENQ situation was just a wee bit different then uh that would have not have you know this would have been a an unfortunate start to the week where it go that would have been you know a full stop. So yeah I got very lucky but that's trading. So that is it my friends. Uh, if you got anything out of that video, uh, maybe like if you use those trade zones or whatever and you like that, then please like the video, give us subscribe, helps us out, cost you nothing. If you're interested in getting trade zones sent to your inbox every week, two ideas, uh, updates for those ideas, update from me and Dan, then check out the swing report links in the description below. And if you're looking interested in getting these live call outs for trades, daytime frame trades in the futures room, check out the community links in the description below. It's a great place to learn. I have a lot of fun here. Um, otherwise, appreciate you tuning in. Thanks for sharing some of your time and energy with me. Hope you enjoy the rest of your I was almost a session. weekend and I hope to catch you on next time.