Gemini versus Chat GPT is insane. Today, I'm going to show you something crazy. Chat GPT just went head-to-head with Google's Gemini, and the results shocked me. I tested them both on real business tasks, image creation, editing, automation, code. One of them crushed product photos, the other built entire workflows by clicking around your screen. I'm talking about AI that can actually run your marketing. This isn't theory. I ran the test live and I'm about to show you which one wins for your business. Hey, if we haven't met already, I'm the digital avatar of Julian Goldie, CEO of SEO agency Goldie Agency. Whilst he's helping clients get more leads and customers, I'm here to help you get the latest AI updates. Julian Goldie reads every comment, so make sure you comment below. Now, look, AI just changed again. Google dropped a Gemini 2. 5 flash image. This thing does multi-image fusion, character consistency, and image editing that actually works. Then they released Gemini computer use. It's an AI that controls your browser and clicks through websites for you. Meanwhile, Chat GPT rolled out GPT40 improvements, better images, better text rendering, new voice features. So, we've got two AI giants, both dropping major updates, both claiming they're the best. But which one actually helps you make money? I ran real tests. product images for e-commerce, image edits for marketing, character designs for branding, code generation for developers, user interface automation for operations, and I'm about to break down every single result. Let's start with images because if you're running ads, making content, or selling products, you need visuals fast. I gave both AI the same prompt. Create a high converting hero image of black wireless headphones on a white background. Add three product angle thumbnails. Leave space for a headline. Gemini 2. 5 flash image crushed this. The lighting looked professional. The product angles were clean. The multi-image fusion worked perfectly. It gave me one main hero shot with three smaller product views built right in. Like something you'd see on Apple's website. I could use this in ads right now. No designer needed. Chat GPT's GPT40 did something different. The main image was good. Clean product shot. Nice shadows. But here's where it won. The text rendering was perfect. When I added the headline text, it looked crisp. No weird fonts, no blurry letters. Chat GPT is better at putting actual words into images. If you need text overlays for social posts or ads, that matters. So, round one, Gemini wins for multi-image product shots. Chat GPT wins for text and images. Pick based on what you actually need. I tested both tools with this prompt. Generate five frames of the same cartoon. Mascot, front view, left view, right view, action pose, logo, badge, version. Keep all features and colors consistent. This is what a real business needs. Gemini nailed it. All five images looked like the same character, same colors, same style, same face. You could actually use this for a brand. Google built Gemini 2. 5 specifically for this. They know businesses need consistency. It works. Chat GPT struggled. The character looked different in every image. Colors shifted, style changed. One looked like a cartoon. Another looked semi-realistic. If you showed these to a client, they'd ask why you gave them five different mascots. Not usable. For branding and character work, Gemini wins. No contest. But let's talk about something Chat GPT does better. Copyrightiting. I asked both tools to write six social captions for a product launch. Three short ones for Twitter, 20 to 40 characters, three long ones for LinkedIn, two to three lines each. This is daily work for marketing teams. Chat GPT understood the assignment immediately. The short captions were punchy, attentiongrabbing, ready to post. The LinkedIn captions had personality. They felt human. I'd only edit maybe one or two words. That's it. Chat GPT is trained on so much written content that it just gets tone and style. It knows what works on each platform. Gemini's captions were okay, but they felt generic like AI wrote them. You'd need to edit more, rewrite parts, add personality. It's not bad, it's just not as good. For copywriting and content creation, Chat GPT is still the leader. Now, here's where it gets wild. I tested both on code generation because if you're building tools, automating tasks, or running any kind of tech operation, you need code that actually works. I gave them both this prompt. Write a TypeScript function that takes an image URL, uploads it to an S3 bucket, returns assigned URL, and handles retries. Chat GBT gave me code that looked right. Clean structure, good error handling. But when I checked it closely, there were small mistakes. It used one function name that doesn't exist in the AWS SDK. Not a huge error, but you'd have to catch it and fix it. For someone who knows code, that's fine. For someone who doesn't, that's a problem. Gemini's code was more accurate. It used the right AWS SDK methods. Error handling was solid. Retry logic worked. I'd still test it before using it in production, but it was closer to correct out of the box. If
you're not a developer and you're trying to automate something, that extra accuracy helps. for coding. Both are good. Chat GPT is faster and more conversational. Gemini is slightly more accurate. Pick based on your skill level. Now, let's talk about something serious. Safety. Because these tools are getting more powerful, and with power comes risk. The new chat GPT updates have some safety regressions, meaning it's more likely to produce harmful content than before. Gemini has safety filters built for business use. Google is more conservative. That's good and bad. Good because you're less likely to get weird outputs. bad because sometimes it blocks things that are totally fine. Chat GPT is more flexible, but that flexibility comes with risk. You need to decide what your business can tolerate. M before we keep going, I want to tell you about something that's going to help you make way more money with AI. I'm talking about the AI profit boardroom. This is the best place to scale your business, get more customers, and save hundreds of hours with AI automation. Inside you get access to proven strategies, real case studies, and a community of people actually building with AI, not theory, real results. If you're serious about using AI to grow, this is where you need to be. Link is in the description. Go check it out right now. All right, let's talk speed and cost. Because even if a tool is amazing, if it's too slow or too expensive, you won't use it. I tested both on response time. For simple prompts, they're about the same. Fast, a few seconds. For complex tasks like image generation or code, Gemini was slightly faster. Not by much, maybe 10 to 15 seconds difference, but when you're running hundreds of tasks, that adds up. Cost is where it gets interesting. Gemini is available through Google AI Studio and Vertex AI. If you're already using Google Cloud, it integrates easily. Pricing is tiered. You can start cheap and scale up. Open AI's API, lots of third-party integrations, huge ecosystem. If you're using tools like Zapia or Make Chat GPT probably connects easier. So here's the verdict. Who should use what? If you need advanced image editing, multi-image fusion, consistent characters for branding or UI automation, use Gemini. It's built for production marketing and operations work. If you're a Google Cloud shop, it's a no-brainer. The computer use feature alone is worth it for ops teams. If I had to rate them on a simple scale, images, Gemini gets five stars. Chat GPT gets four. Text and copy. Chat GPT gets five stars. Gemini gets three. Automation, Gemini gets five stars. Chat GPT gets three. Safety, Gemini gets four Ecosystem, Chat GPT gets five stars. Gemini gets four. NA tool is perfect. Both have strengths. Both have gaps. The smartest businesses use both. Now, let me tell you about something that's completely free and will change how you use AI. I'm talking about the AI money lab. This is a free community with over 50 AI tools, 200 chat GPT SEO prompts, and a full blueprint to generate thousands of leads with AI. You'll learn how to make money with AI agents. You get access to over a,000 free workflows, and you'll see real case studies from people making money right now, not fake guru stuff, real results. It's completely free. Join today. The AI race is heating up. Google and Open AAI are both pushing hard. New features every month, better models every quarter. If you're not testing and adapting, you're falling behind. Your competitors are using these tools right now. They're creating content faster, running ads cheaper, automating operations. You need to keep up. So, go test both tools. See what works. And don't just pick based on hype. Pick based on results. That's how you win. Thanks for watching. Make sure you subscribe, hit the bell, and I'll see you in the next