Hillary Clinton Loses Control in Epstein Testimony

Hillary Clinton Loses Control in Epstein Testimony

Machine-readable: Markdown · JSON API · Site index

Поделиться Telegram VK Бот
Транскрипт Скачать .md
Анализ с AI

Оглавление (2 сегментов)

Segment 1 (00:00 - 05:00)

You asked the question, I'm going to answer your question. This was what I spent my time doing. — Oh, for heaven. — So, I would like to understand how that — It doesn't matter. We all are abiding by the same rules. — I'd like to have — Hillary Clinton had one simple goal, clearer name in the Epstein controversy without looking nasty. Instead, she ended up looking defensive, antagonistic, and selfserving. In this video, we'll look at the key moments where her communication strategy backfired, and we'll see what a smarter strategy would have looked like. Number one, anger. Obviously, notice it also spills over towards her own lawyer, cutting her off in a rather crude manner. — Can you please explain how that — I'm done with this? If you guys are doing that, I am done. You can — just ask yourself, would you like to work for a person with this character? If the answer is no, probably it's because you don't like this character. Number two, disdain. Related to anger, and this is a major general issue with Hillary Clinton, her facial expressions are unlikable. They show disdain, anger, and superiority. — Why don't you get over here? — Far from reality. So, you know, we saw the cancel culture. That's the we saw the Voke revolution. We don't I think there is male and female. — Her words are equally nari with many different types of power moves. An example, — you know, Mr. Chairman, I really appreciate that question and I can't say that about many of the questions. — On its own, this would have been okay and even funny. But put it all together and the picture that emerges is one of low warmth and high antagonism. Speaking of which, number three, antagonism. See an example here, yelling to get her point across. — You asked the question, I'm going to answer your question. Trying to look out for other survivors lost,000 lives. — Number four, politics before victims. listen to her key moments and it's all about political and legal issues. — We had a bit of a challenge in the beginning because we agreed upon rules and one of the members violated uh that rule which was uh very upsetting. So we had to cease the hearing for a period of time until we could get asurances that — which brings us to the major point number five low empathy. How many times did she talk about the victims? need for justice? She did it a few times to be fair, but even when she did it, it came across as cold and detached. Thank you for a fun night. Your littlest girl was a little naughty. — How does that make you feel? — Makes me sick. Said that she felt God's presence next to her when she was in bed. She knows that Jesus watches over her and he helped save her life. Whoops. — It's bizarre. I don't know what it means. — Instead of empathy, instead she displayed six selfserving pattiness. Chairman Comr asked him about the allegations in his view about Russia's uh involvement in my election in 2016. So I appreciated that. I uh want to see the truth come out. That was uh a reassuring way to end uh a very long repetitive uh deposition. my election in 2016. Why are you even going back there? It's not a good idea in general and especially in existence on what is the most revoling scandal in your country's history. You're talking again about your election. Well, here is the truth about your election. A good reason why Hillary Clinton lost it is because of this. It's because she doesn't come across as a likable and trustworthy person. And whether we like it or not, being not liikable matters more for women than for men. And her unlikability and antagonism also extended with the press. Number seven, antagonism with press and lies. This is a small detail, but see if you spot it. — Hello everybody. — Hello. — Well, I have just finished. — She says hello everybody. but without looking at everybody and without saying hello to anybody. Instead, she looks down. Compare. When socially skilled

Segment 2 (05:00 - 08:00)

people enter a room, they usually scan the room. Hi everybody. Good to see you. This is a move that makes people feel like you like them. This makes you high power and likable. She doesn't do that. Instead, she looks down and when she leaves, her tone is far higher dominance than warmth. — I don't know when the video will be out. — Again, we must remind here that unfortunately people tend to judge women more harshly than men when they are higher dominance without warmth. What she should have done more of instead, one, more cooperiveness. She did this and she did this when she realized she went too far. Look at this. — Howard Lutnik was — If you have an email with me asking Jeffrey Epste for money from — I am very sympathetic to your personal situation. I have read about it. I have seen you testify or speak on the floor about it. — Great. That's what she needed to do more of. More of that and much less nastiness. Two, get your lawyers to be nasty for you. A much better strategy is to have your lawyers to be your pitbulls so that you can look nicer and more cooperative by comparison. They were doing it at a certain point here, — particularly given that we have asked for a public hearing. If there are photos that are being released of the secretary as she is testifying, can you please explain how that — I'm done with this. If you got — problem is for Hillary, it was never enough. instead of moving on, she had to be the one to go extreme. She made her lawyers look nice by comparison by looking herself nasty. And number three, what I would have liked to see is the most ruthless move. Cut ties with Bill Clinton. In people's minds and in the evidence and past behavior, Bill Clinton is far more implicated in the Epstein history. Hillary didn't need to go down with that ship. Instead, she overly defended him. See an example. — The standard you just set in your own words just now. Does this standard apply equally to your husband or only President Trump? I have said that my husband has been subpoenaed. He will appear. He will answer your questions to the best of his ability. But there is no evidence whatsoever of any connection with Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. And I think that will be u obviously uh apparent in the questioning. — What makes you so sure of that then? I mean he's photograph speculate on something that's not — Yeah. I it is so speculative. I mean swimming in a pool, sitting in a hot tub. — There is nothing honorable in defending dishonorable behavior. If somebody close to you act dishonorably, it sucks that you must cut ties. Honorable men never defend dishonor.
Ctrl+V

Экстракт Знаний в Telegram

Экстракты и дистилляты из лучших YouTube-каналов — сразу после публикации.

Подписаться

Дайджест Экстрактов

Лучшие методички за неделю — каждый понедельник