GPT 5.2 VS Claude 4.5 VS Gemini 3 Pro: Who Wins?

Chia Gibbt 5. 2 versus claw versus Google Gemini 3. Who wins? Today we're going to be testing them out side by side and seeing which one performs the best. And basically, if you've not seen this, GBT 5. 2 was just released yesterday. And today we're going to be diving into basically the biggest AI showdown of 2025, which is Chat GPT 5. 2 versus Claude versus Google Gemini. And these brand new three models just dropped and everyone's asking the same question which is which one should you actually use. And so here's what I'm going to show you today. I'm going to break down the real differences between all three. We're going to be testing them live side by and then we'll be showing you some of the best strategies to use this stuff.

All right. So we're going to take one of the first prompts and just get straight into this and create the infinite fractal universe explorer. So we're going to take this grab this prompt. These prompts are inside the AI success lab link in the comments description. We're going to run this through chat 5. 2. 2 first, then we'll run it through Claude Opus. I've got Opus 4. 5 selected. And then from here, we're going to run this through Google Gemini. If you have any questions as we go along, feel free to ask as well. Main thing is to if we're filling the gaps together. If you have questions or I've missed something out, feel free to ask as we go along and I'll be happy to help. But yeah, we're just going to test this and see how we do. All right, so

Gemini is beginning to code that out. So, you can see it's already coding that out. Let's see how Opus is doing. Opus is coding that out nicely as well and GPT 5. 2 is coding out too. So they've all understood the intent of the test. Let's see what they come up with when it comes to actually coding this out. It be interesting to see which one creates the fastest. So it's quite a big code right there. Everyone inside my a profit boarding community right now is asking like the same question as well, which is Julian, which one do I use? And honestly, I can give you some ideas, but I want to test this out for myself. I've been running Claude Sonic for my entire business for months now. My content engine, my SEO workflows, my customer support, everything runs through Claude at this point. Chat GPT 5. 2 comes out with something that's faster reasoning. Gemini drops with deeper workspace integration. Claude Opus promises something better as well. And so, right now, we just want to test them and see how it performs. And so, let's see what we got. We've got the response from GT 5. 2 here. So, we've got the Fractal Universe Creator. It's pretty crazy. Let's have a look what we've got from Claude Opus that is just loading right here. Honestly, this one looks a lot nicer. You can switch between different styles as well, different universes and that. So, you got Julia Mandelro burning ship and then you can click through and you get all these crazy animations. And let's have a look at Google Gemini. So, Gemini actually forgot to enable canvas. So, I'm just going to go to tools canvas and say run this. See what happens. There we go. So, it's coding now. This definitely looks better, right? Every time I move my mouse, this changes color, which is pretty cool. And then you can flick between them. If you're wondering what the prompt here, we said, "Create an interactive fractal universe where users can zoom infinitely into mathematical patterns. Essume level reveals new galaxies made of mandler sets, Julia sets, and custom fractals. Include particle systems that react to mouse movement, which is what it's doing as I'm moving around, creating nebulike trails. Add pulsating colors that shift through the entire spectrum, blah blah. " And then it's beginning to code these out. But I still think I prefer Claude Opus. Let's have a look at Gemini. Oh, Gemini is pretty cool. This is the most reactive. Look at that. Beautiful. We can switch between them. We can zoom in, zoom out, zoom into different universes there. Yeah, I'm going to say Gemini comes in first there. That's pretty nice. The way it's designed, the way it's so reactive as well. If we have a look at Claude, not bad, but a little bit laggy. That's the only thing that I don't like. You can see when I zoom in, zoom out, etc. It's quite laggy here. And then if we have a look at GPT 5. 2, just feels a little bit messy. Yeah, I would agree with VD right there. Whatever he said. So, let's try

the next one now. And the next prompt that I'm going to try is building out a game. By the way, these prompts and all this training on GPT 5. 2, Opus 4. 5, notebook, etc. It's all inside the AI lab, which is a free AI community that connects you with 38,000 members. So, we're going to try a game here. There's a build endless runner where the player jumps across procedurally generated floating platforms in a cyberpunk void. Right. Then, we've got a bunch of other stuff and we're going to try this out right here. So, let's go to 5. 2. Select canvas again. This time I'm going to try and correct game Gemini. Just remember to select canvas when you test it out. Gemini. And then we've got Claude as well. So, just to recap, Gemini has won the test so far. I also really like the speed of Gemini. I just feel like it all feels a lot faster when it's moving. If you have a look at GT5, it's pretty fast. You know, the other thing I would say here is there's an old way and a new way of using these AIs, right? So like the old way is like the single model trap where you pick one AI and force it to do everything and spend hours fighting with prompts that don't work because you're using the wrong tool or getting frustrated with chat GBT when it fails at research or cla content wasting time switching between the models and building automations that break because one model can't handle the workflow and missing opportunities because you didn't know which door actually solves the problem. I would say quite often what I find myself doing is like a triple stack approach where I might use chatchi 5. 2 too for like really quick answers. And then I'll use Claude Opus for creating content cuz he's very sentient. And then when it comes to actually coding, I do prefer Gemini 3. You can match each model to its strength so every task gets done faster and better. And then you build hybrid workflows where each AI handles what it's best at. You stop wasting time testing and start knowing which tool to open. And actually on the regeneration as well, Claude Opus failed and now it's fixing it. If we have a

look at Gemini, Gemini seems to have worked. Let's have a look. So, it's fixing that. Oh, there we go. I think this has worked. There we go. That's a pretty hard game to play. Wow, that is a tricky game, but it looks the best and it's performed the best. It's the only one that's given us an output so far. Let's try Gemini Steel testing. Let's have a look at G5. 2. See what we got here. Ah, we got a bug straight away. Look at that. Minecraft in chat 5. 2. If you've got a sharable link, I'd love to see that actually. Ghost Striker. That's pretty crazy. So, it's editing this now. Looks like it's going to be nice, but it's still taking ages. Gemini seems like completely broken. Claude is the only one that's actually given us something decent now. Yeah, Gemini is just totally broken, isn't it? That was a total mess. I think that's failed. And document may exceed maximum length. So, it looks like chat GPT 5. 2 couldn't do it. Gemini couldn't do it and Claude won that by a long way. Claude was the only one that could actually create it. So, just to recap there, test one, Gemini, two, Claude Opus one. Let's move on to the next one. So, I want to try building

an agency landing page where services are represented buildings in an isometric 3D city. So, you scroll through the camera flies through the city hovering over service buildings. Blah blah. Let's try this one. All right, let's grab that. How long did it take you to build Minecraft? By the way, be interested to know that if you let me know. Can you put GD 5. 2 thinking? I think you've set the normal one. Okay, let's try that. Let's try. We'll duplicate the tab and we'll test GPD 5. 2 thinking. I thought it would auto select which one to use anyway, but we can try it thinking. So we'll test it out. So we got think in here normal GP 5. 2 here. Gemini 3 and then claude opus 20 minutes cuz I use chat GP extra high actually. Did you use a API? Some people as well like before they jump into AI automation that they think okay I should just wait until one AI becomes clearly superior. I think the wrong belief here is like eventually one model will dominate and solve everything. And the real problem here is like waiting for perfect instead of using what works right now. I think there's a concept in business called good enough now beats perfect later is the best strategy is using what's available right now. So you can use all three models in different ways. I'm just showing you some of the interesting use cases and something fun for YouTube. If you want to learn like how to actually implement this stuff and which models I use for each system in my business then I'd recommend checking out the AI profit boarding. So we got some questions popping up here now. I'm using like yep AI is free web. Oh nice good tip there. Thanks Curtis. My question is can chat GPT do this coding stuff maths and physics using Python libraries like simpy numpy etc should be in a project if anyone knows the answer to that let us know I don't really code with Python and stuff so I'm probably not coder so I don't know if I'm the right person to ask for that not going to answer something I don't know and then Burmass says great to see you GPT 5. 2 is a total mess it didn't keep its promise at all marketing operation I got to agree I think there's some amazing marketing from chat GPT 5. 2 But when you actually drill down to it and you test out, it's just not that interesting. Can't you post the prompt that you're using here, I can't really post it in the chat cuz it's not copy and pasteable. But you can just go to the AI lab and then go to the classroom, new automations, and it's literally right there. You can just grab all the prompts right there. All right. So, we need to test this out now. So

run this on canvas. So, this is the normal version of T5. 2. It's beginning to run on canvas now. We have GPT 5. 2 thinking ready as well. So test this on canvas. This is interest. It's a mess. The response from it's quite interesting, but the buttons don't really work. You can add it to the cart, but it does nothing. And then it's just got some random testimony. So I wouldn't say Gemini did a great job there. Now we've got the response from Opus. And I would say this is the only one that I've seen that actually makes sense. Let's pull this up. Yeah, this is the best response so far. Still, it's a little bit cut off on the side there. I don't know if I need to zoom out. There you go. All right. And then this is actually like a website. It looks a lot nicer. It's quite an interesting prompt. And then you can switch between these and add them to car. There you go. Boom. All right. Gemini 3. Not the best. Wouldn't use that at all. Let's preview the normal mode from GT5. So, it's actually got a bug in it here. As you can see, like the graphics are not loading. So, I'm going to click on fix bug and we'll see if we can fix that. And then we have the response from GPT 5. 2. Thinking still coding out, but we'll check it in

a sec. Is it free? If you want to use GPT 5. 2 for free or do you mean the prompts? The prompts themselves, the AI, yeah, the AI successor lab is free. So, you can just join now. Link in the comments description. It's completely free. Connects you with 38,000 people interested in AI automation. It's a free group. You can see all these free trainings inside here. So, it's pretty insane. Look at all these free trainings you get. This is better than most people's paid communities and we just give it away for free. You also get a bunch of NAS templates, automations, that sort of thing. And yeah, if you go to this section, this is all free. So, you can just check it out. Do you think chat cheap will release another version before the six? Yeah, I think probably another version will come out before I think GPT6 will be like maybe next year, but maybe it will take even longer. So, this is the preview from chat GPT 5. 2 and you can see the graphic that should be here isn't working. So, again, like cheapy 5. 2 doesn't win this round on the normal mode, but let's check out the thinking mode. So, we'll try thinking and test this out as well. Hey, this is pretty cool. Yeah, this is looking good. I like it. It's got a bug. I'm just going to fix that bug right now. That's an interesting one. I'll wait for it to fix a bug and then we'll decide afterwards. Wasn't the big feature the personality. So there was a lot of new features with GT 5. 2. Let's have a look at the website and see what they were boasting. So basically they were saying it's like the most capable series yet for knowledge work and you can see all the evaluation here. Model performance. So for knowledge work tasks it's supposed to perform the best, right? You can see for example navigating a spreadsheet or coding, right? Coding is one of the main assets here as well. It's supposed to outperform a lot of the other models when it comes to coding. You can see they boast like some of the stuff you can code out and build like the holiday card builder, the typing rain game, and the ocean wave simulation. So, it's not just for personality, I think. Yeah. Yeah, personality. Peter says, "Thank you for what you do. You are the only YouTuber right now brave enough to do it live with no fanboy fluff. " Thank you so much, Pet. I appreciate you, man. Thanks. Gemini is still the best and Claude needs to fix the token limits. So I think they did fix that with Opus 4. 5 actually. You never run out of context now inside the conversation which is pretty good. Let's see what we got. Look at if anyone needs this has happened twice today now isn't it? Document may exceed maximum length. Document might be longer than a canvas can currently happen. To edit please reduce the length. So you see here it's hit a limit on the length of the conversation inside canvas. And so we actually we can't use this model right simply because it's hit the limit which is super annoying. So the only one that really worked right there was Claude again from what I remember too. Whereas for example Gemini failed on that one but it has won one so far. 5. 2 has pretty much failed on every single test we've done so far. So that's pretty crazy. Michelle that one looks great though. Good promise. Yeah I think it was looking better. It's just like it failed on the conversation limits. Till now we system is performing better to do dashboards websites. Loveable bolt anti-gravity another one and which of them. So I would go with claude opus. And then for building websites and stuff, I think you better I'll give you an example, right? So if you look at this website that we built, this was built with Claude Opus 4. 5. We didn't use a coder to do it. We just built it directly on the website. And so I think that's one of the best ways to do it is you just code it out directly in the chat like you can see we've done right here and then you grab the HTML and you can just use that on your website. I think that's genuinely the best way to use claw opus or to use any sort of lm in general unless you're building out like a huge website and then you could always use like claw opus combined with cursor or with the s code and that sort of thing. Chat GT still has that problem exceeding limits. It's crazy. I know that's happened to me twice today already live. So not great. Who's the

smartest one? I'm going to say Asha says Claude makes the best UI. I would agree. And Michelle says low. Imagine that low chat falling short. Yeah, 100%. So, as you've seen today, Claw has not run out of token limits. It's context. It's outperformed chat GPT on every single test. It's actually created usable prototypes unlike chat GBT in Gemini failed a couple of times as well to be fair. Let's be honest here. And these are like quite complex prompts. So, I really wanted to test it. Let's

try building out Snake into a 3D light cycle arena game. All right. So, I'm going to run that now. Give it another cheeky go. Yeah, it's a total mess on a GP. We'll try thinking mode again and we'll make sure we use the canvas and we'll give Gemini another shot too. I'm tempted to use deep think but it's going to take ages if we create an output with deep think. I'm not going to use that but we'll just use Gemini Pro. Claude for the win. Love watching you test. Appreciate that Michelle. Thank you. Yeah, I would agree. Claude is winning. Claude sounds better when it speaks. 100% it does 100%. When I actually use

Claw like if one thing I like to do in the morning, right, is I walk around the park. I take an hour walk and the biggest problem in my business that I'm trying to solve, I'll speak to Claude directly inside the chat and I'll run through like all the options for the constraints. The reason that I use Claude over chat GPT or over Gem is it feels the most sentient when it's responding to you and it gives you like the most logical answers, but also the 962. So like when you get answers and responses from Claude, it just feels like a lot nicer to use. It's a lot easier to understand and the responses don't feel like AI. It feels like a human talking to you, like a very logical human. And also the formatting is super nice as well when you're using this. I think really what's made a big difference for Claude is like the skills, right? So, for example, when Claude builds and if we ask it to build something like this, which is very visual, it's going to use this front-end design skill. So, like it has these different skills built in that it can use to code. And I think that's one of the best ways to use this. Ta says, "Wow, insane. This is insane. " I don't know if you're joking, but I appreciate the feedback anyway. And then Pedro says, "Usually I'm using Love to do the front end and then paste the project on cursor and work force on it. " See, another Claude uses there. I don't use cursor that much, but yeah, I do think it's a good option. And then we've got ghost striker who says, "Chat cheap still not good at images. I showed him six figure image. Asked how many fingers is it holding up in an image said five, but Gemini does it better. " Yeah, Gemini. Honestly, Gemini is like the go for images, right? So, for example, I

try and find the chat history here. Let me find this. Here we go. So, if you go to Gemini now, you go inside the chat, you're going to scroll down to here. Here it is. So, pretty much all my thumbnails now, what I'll do is I'll take like old thumbnails and just edit them. Right? If I'm creating a live stream, for example. So, for example, for this thumbnail on the live, this was the original that we used. It was an old thumbnail. Then I just say something like change text to build for 4. 5, 55 to 5. 2, 2. 5 to 3. You can see here that it looks really good. And if I do the same thing inside the image from the image creator from chat GPT, let's see what it does. Right. So I'm going to go to create image. We'll plug that in. We'll go back here. We'll copy this image. Paste it into chat GPT. That is a limitation of port to be fair. It doesn't do this. It won't do this. If I give it exactly the same instructions inside chat, it's got the image with the text. This will literally come up within 30 60 seconds inside Gemini using nanob, right? Whereas if we're creating the image with chat GBT, that is going to take absolutely ages and I can almost guarantee that it's not going to be as good as Geminis's. Let's see. We've got

the light cycle arena from Claude. I do the UI and the design from Claude. It looks pretty nice. So, let's enter the grid. And this is the game that we create, right? It breaks on the refresh. That's the only issue. Let's refresh the page. Yeah. See, I can drift as well. Look at that. We're drifting now as well. And then we've teleported. Let's teleport again. Boom. Look at that. That's quite a cool fun game to play with. Right. So, you can see that clearly Claude has is coded out something super nice here. I don't know why it's Why is it called Dest? I don't know. But 3D Snake is looking really cool. Right now, let's have a look at GPT 5. 2. This is using Thinking Mode as you can see. And look, boom. Bug straight away. So, this is GPT5 on thinking mode and it's just super messy. Now, if we go back to the image created with chat GPT as well. So this is the same test, exact same prompt as you can see. So Gemini versus chat GPC 5. 2 and you can see that Gemini has cropped it perfectly. The image is ready to go. I literally just downloaded that and uploaded it to YouTube. If you have a look at, for example, chat GBT, you can see that it's cut off the text. images and I can't use that. It's not even the right dimensions, I think, for a thumbnail and it's not cropped at all. I could tell it to crop it properly, but why do I have to tell it to crop it properly? Right? If I'm trying to move fast, get things done, it's like the best employee that worst for me is the one that just takes my instructions and runs from it. The worst would be the one where I have to like literally step by step create something so simple that they literally can't use it. So, let's go back to that was just average. Let's have a look at Gemini now. Actually, to be fair, the UI on Gemini looks very similar to the on Claude. Let's try this out. Whoa, this is crazy stuff. It's not as nice to play. Let's put it that way. It makes me feel a little bit dizzy. I would say that Claude created the best game there. Again, Claude wins right now. And look at that. We've hit the maximum length. So, the document might be longer than the canvas handle to edit. Please reduce the length. GPT has done that three times today. And that's using the thinking mode. I created a video a couple of days ago. Sorry, one day ago about 5. 2 and everyone was like, you didn't use thinking mode blah blah. You can clearly see here that even when we use thinking mode, it just struggles. You can't create anything usable. Whereas, we give exactly the same prompts to Claude and it smashes it. Exactly the same prompt to Gemini and it creates something usable. I wouldn't say it's as nice, but it creates something usable. Does GT 5. 2 allow you to use canvas in a project? That's a good question. I never really use projects anymore. Let's have a look here. We'll try this out. So, we got the power machine. Switch to canvas. Yeah. So, this is a project and we can use canvas inside the projects right there. So, you can do that. Swift says, "Great to see you and your actual voice. Please go back to doing your own videos and drop the AI generated ones. " I would, but the thing is, if I create two videos about the same topic, my AI avatar will always beat me. Like, literally at this point, the watch time, the click-through rate, the view count, etc. is always higher on my AI generated ones. But I do

daily live streams. So, if you want to see videos with me as a human every day, just go to the live stream section inside YouTube here and then you can watch the live streams with me here, right? So, we drop live streams pretty much every day, multiple times a week. So you can just watch those and it's me or you can join the AI profitable boardroom and inside the AR profit boardroom inside the calendar here we have four coaching calls a week on AI automation. So you can jump on these coaching calls ask questions and that's with a real human. 5. 2 canvas gets stuck to it's bad. Yeah, I would agree. Alexandra this one is much better. Claude is definitely the best for software development. 5. 2 is highly upsetting. M legendary good to see you here man. I actually met Martin at the school games. Really cool guy. Definitely check out what he's doing on YouTube and Tik Tok and everything else. Creates some really cool content. So that's basically it for AO automations. As you can see, GT5. 2 not very good, right? It's let us down on every single test. It didn't win a single test today. We've put it through loads of different tests, tried loads of different things. The benchmarks super impressive. In reality, it breaks so much. I'm not, by the way, I'm not a hater of OpenAI. I actually really like some of the stuff they've done in the past. I think that I'm always going to be grateful for chat GBT and everything else. But honestly, from what I'm seeing, it's just it's nowhere near the same level as Claude. Claude is just on a totally different level for games, for creating tools, for creating websites, for coding, for writing even. Claude is the best. And so open eye, they're in serious troubles. You can see I can see why they've created a code red recently because they're in serious trouble. They're not competing. Every time they create an update, it's not as good. And yeah, it's just it's like why? What are we doing here, guys? I do feel like they rushed 5. 2 and they rushed 5. 2 simply because Claude was so good, because Gemini was so good and Google is really taking over in a lot of the different models, right? So, for coding, for images, for video, Claude, Gemini is absolutely smashed it and so is Claude when it comes to coding. What is the best model when using it in client route or kilo code? If you can afford it, you know, use Claude Opus. Obviously, it costs it does cost. If you want something cheap with high context windows, then you can use Gemini, right? So, for example, let's pull these up and we can compare them side by side. So, we've got GPT 5. 2 and we can compare that versus another model. So, we'll select Claude and we'll do Opus 4. 5, right? So, you can see the context window is higher for GPT 5. 2 and it's cheaper to use 5. 2 than it is to use, right? So, you'd expect chat cheap to be a better model, but as you can see, like even when you in the chat with canvas and everything, it gets messy, right? And then if you want to compare it against Gemini. So this you can do this on open router. Just go to open router and then select the model and compare it. So if you go into here and you type in Gemini 3 preview, you can see that Gemini for coding as an API. Number one, similar sort price. Although 5. 2 is 1. 75 versus $2 for Gemini, but the context length is way higher. So you get way more context limit with Gemini 3 Pro preview than you do with GT 5. 2. And then you can also see here the input modalities are much more vast when it comes to Gemini versus GPT 5. 2. All right. So if you're looking at a superior API that's cheaper or if you want the cheapest API then you can just use 5. 2. But as you've seen today the outputs are not as good as Gemini. Claude has projects. Yeah. So all you do if you want to go to projects inside Claude is you go to Claude and then projects on the left hand side. And you'll see all these projects I've created. I use this every day for example for creating the live stream notes super useful for that but my team as well they use it for so much stuff. Asha says that's crazy and the models and can't compete. I use claudis code and cursor and I'm testing antiquable with the paid versions to use cl and cursor. It's very good for debugging local websites and creating features quickly. That's good input. Thanks for sharing Raphael. Peter

says Julian, do you think the time will come where each AI platform will be equal and the users choice will come down to cost not benchmarks? I think we've been doing this battle for two or three years and it's never quite equal. So I don't expect that to happen anytime soon. But imagine what I don't know Gemini 40 is going to be like. That's going to be insane, right? Or imagine what Chachi is going to be like. Also, I do feel like the gap is widening between each of these models. So for example, like in the beginning, you had Chat GPT and it was the leader by a long way and then you had a period where like Chat Chet and Claude and Gemini were people. But now you look and the gap is widening between Claude and Gemini who are at the front and chaty and these other models are behind. Asha says how could they release another model after a month Google build is already good makes 5. 2 look bad. Gemini has improved but it doesn't seem to have projects. So if you want to use Gemini projects mode then what you would do is you go to where is it now? You go to gems. So gems is like the alternative to projects right and inside here you can create your own sort of gems like you see right here with the SEO content writer. So, if you want to use something similar, then you can use gems, which is very similar to custom GPTs. So, that's basically it, peeps. Thanks very much for watching. As you've seen today, Claude Opus absolutely smashes it and really won there. It crashed pretty much, didn't it? If you want to get a 30-day road map as well for implementing this stuff, go to the AI success lab in the comments description. Then, you're going to go to this comparison notes here. You get all the prompts from today. As you can see, loads more prompts I didn't actually have time to use. And then you actually see a 30-day implementation plan as well on how to implement this. So you you'll see how we use this and how you can learn this stuff in 30 days if you want to steal this stuff from me. So that's all inside the AI success lab. And if you haven't already, check out the AI profit boardroom. Comes with a community of 1,800 members that you can connect with. The main thing that I would say here is when you join the AI profit boardroom like today, this isn't just a course. This is like the complete AI business infrastructure that removes 80% of your manual work and gives you the systems actually scale, right? So for example, you get the AI automation engine, right? And this is all inside the classroom here. So this is a complete framework for building AI automation systems that handle your content, leads, and customer service. And this is what I teach every day, right? So if you go inside here, you get the six week AI automation road map as well as AI automation playbook. As you can see, you also get daily coaching with me. So every single day I'm inside the community answering questions, breaking down new tools, and helping you build your systems. You also get access to 1,000 pre-built automations. And these are like ready to use systems for content creation, lead qualification, email sequences, custom service, and more. And you just plug them in and then they work. You also get the school community engine showing you exactly how to build and scale a community using automation. And you get loads of dumpy systems, right? So you get a pre-built funnel system, the outreach agent, you get the fulfillment workflows. This is all inside the AI profit boardroom when you join today. You get the thousandx content machine. This is a system that produces a month of content in a few hours using automation. and the YouTube AI with everything needed to research, script, optimize, and scale YouTube content using AI. And you also get the AI avatar clone engine. So, this basically lets you create AI versions for yourself for content, custom service, and more. So, there's so many different things on here. We actually have a December holiday deal right now because you're joining through this special window. You'll see access to the entire holiday bonus stack. So that's like the school playbook, a deep think system for AI reasoning, avatar content creation engines, YouTube growth systems, SAP libraries for every major business challenge tools and even more. All right. And the thing I would say is this is what really matters. This isn't about how many things you get. It's about the time you get back and the leverage you gain. So with the AI profit boardroom, like every single one of these systems is designed to remove manual work from your business and replace it with automation that runs 24/7. So most people spend like years of piecing this stuff together, trying different tools, building broken workflows, wasting time on systems that don't work. You're getting the complete infrastructure today. You get everything you need to automate content, leads, custom service, fulfillment, and growth, plus daily coaching to make sure it all works for your specific business. And right now during the December promotion, you're saving 40% off with the entire holiday stack, right? And so this is the point where you need to decide, okay, do you want to spend like 2025 and 2026 doing everything manually, watching everyone else scale with AI whilst you fall behind, or do you want to step into the new year with 23 complete systems doing the heavy lifting for you whilst you focus on growth? The window closes soon. This discount and the stack isn't going to last. So if you're ready to automate your business and stop burning out on manual work, join the AI profit boarding today. Click the link in the comments description and let's build your AI infrastructure together. Let's see what questions we got. Michelle says, "Thank you. " Peter says, "Thank you. It's honestly it's a pleasure to serve you and honestly I'm so appreciative that you've joined today. " So, thanks very much everyone for joining. Yes, need to get in and do my 10 for the day. Get yourself in there. And then Pedro says, "Do you have something to rank in AI results for Google? " Yes. So, if you join, so there's two things you get for SEO, right? Number one for SEO inside here you get all my best AI SEO automations including how to rank inside AI search engines and you get that all inside the AI SEO automation section here right so you get that right here and then also when you join you get free access to the SEO elite circle right and is a complete community dedicated to growing your business with SEO inside the community you can see all these posts you can ask any questions you have you get support you get weekly coaching on SEO and then you also get my best AI SEO strategies, SEO mastermind, the SEO agency mastermind, SEO systems, SEO mastery, and weekly Q& A calls, plus a YouTube SEO course and how to white label SEO as well. So, we give you everything you need to learn this stuff. SP says, "Thank you, Julian. Greet Steven. Good to help. " And Pedro says, "Thanks a lot. Happy to help as well. " So, I appreciate everyone watching today and I will see you on the next one. Cheers for watching. Bada.