These Reactors Solve The Nuclear Safety Problem
6:57

These Reactors Solve The Nuclear Safety Problem

Sabine Hossenfelder 13.05.2026 198 513 просмотров 11 568 лайков

Machine-readable: Markdown · JSON API · Site index

Поделиться Telegram VK Бот
Транскрипт Скачать .md
Анализ с AI
Описание видео
Take back your personal data with Incogni! Use code Sabine at the link below and get 60% off annual plans: https://incogni.com/sabine Generating electricity via nuclear fission is a great idea, at least in principle. But the risk of nuclear meltdowns causing mass destruction and long-lasting contamination isn’t appealing. Luckily, a crop of companies are looking to solve this problem by creating subcritical nuclear reactors, which generate power without ever making runaway nuclear reactions possible. Let’s take a look. 👕T-shirts, mugs, posters and more: ➜ https://sabines-store.dashery.com/ 💌 Support me on Donorbox ➜ https://donorbox.org/swtg 👉 Transcript with links to references on Patreon ➜ https://www.patreon.com/Sabine 📝 Transcripts and written news on Substack ➜ https://sciencewtg.substack.com/ 📩 Free weekly science newsletter ➜ https://sabinehossenfelder.com/newsletter/ 👂 Audio only podcast ➜ https://open.spotify.com/show/0MkNfXlKnMPEUMEeKQYmYC 🔗 Join this channel to get access to perks ➜ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1yNl2E66ZzKApQdRuTQ4tw/join 📚 Buy my book ➜ https://amzn.to/3HSAWJW #science #sciencenews #nuclear #energy

Оглавление (2 сегментов)

Segment 1 (00:00 - 05:00)

Nuclear power is a great idea in principle. But one of the major obstacles to its acceptance is that people are afraid of it. The idea of a runaway chain reaction that can't be stopped and that might contaminate hundreds of square kilometers for decades isn't very comforting. Today I have a very interesting development to report is that we now have several companies working on super safe nuclear reactors that can't have runaway reactions. They're called subcritical reactors. Let's have a look. Nuclear fission reactors derive their energy from the splitting of large atomic nuclei. But how does one split a nucleus? In this stock footage I found this terrible animation. Yeah, it's not how it works. In fission reactors as in atomic bombs one splits atomic nuclei with neutrons. The neutron is not repelled by the positive electric charges in the nucleus. It enters it easily. But then once there it pushes all the other particles in the nucleus around and that destabilizes the nucleus. It decays. Usually it decays into two pretty large chunks that are new smaller atomic nuclei. The important thing is though that for some nuclei it decays into two new nuclei plus two or more neutrons. And now you see the magic. You start with two neutrons, split one nucleus and get energy plus two new neutrons which split two more nuclei from which you get energy plus four neutrons and then you get eight neutrons and so on. This is the chain reaction. This chain reaction can only happen if you have sufficiently many of the nuclei densely packed together. This is what gives rise to the critical mass. That's the threshold of a material like plutonium necessary to launch the chain reaction. The issue is that for a nuclear fission reactor you don't want to explosively release all the energy. So you have to find a way to slow down the reaction. Usually one does this with some sort of moderating material that slows down the neutrons. Still, you have the issue that anything that can fail will fail at some point, and then you're back to the runaway reaction that can overheat and melt the reactor core. Engineers have come up with various clever ways to deal with the problem. In molten salt reactors, for example, if the temperature rises too much, that'll trigger a dump of the molten salt that will cool it, and this happens without any intervention. Then again, molten salt is super highly corrosive and difficult to deal with, and that's the major reason why, despite all the talk about it, we still haven't seen any commercial molten salt thorium reactors. The new technology is now to just never reach the criticality threshold. You just shoot at the reactor core with a neutron beam, turn off the beam, and the fission tape is out quickly. It makes runaway reactions impossible. The most celebrated company working on this is the US startup Empira. They want to build a micro reactor that could generate 15 to 30 MW of power. So, they say it's a hybrid fission-fusion machine with a sealed 3D printed subcritical core that can operate for decades and is never refueled. The radioactive compound is thorium, which then breeds uranium. They have these fancy visuals for their micro reactor, which is supposed to be about 10 m long and 2 to 3 m wide and high. It would roughly fit onto a truck. That's the main selling point, because nothing reassures the public about nuclear power like we can put it on the motorway. But wait, just what's the fusion part? I haven't found any explanation for this on the company pages, but I have a guess. You see, the standard way to get neutrons is from a proton accelerator. You accelerate the protons, slam them into a target, and get a spray of neutrons. The problem is that these proton accelerators are large. We're talking several hundred meters in length. You don't put these on the back of a truck. Looking at the Emperor images, it seems rather clear that the fusion part must be a compact neutron source. The most efficient way to create neutrons from fusion is to use deuterium and tritium fusion. That's kind of the standard fusion process that most fusion startups want to use. The problem is that I don't see how the yield of the fusion reaction will be remotely high enough for their purposes unless they solve fusion first, in which case why use the fission part? So, well, personally, I would not invest into this company. There are other subcritical startups though. For example, subcritical systems in Austin. They say that they're using a proton accelerator for the neutrons and want to bring power online by 2028. We're probably talking about something in the range of 50 to 100 MW or so. Given that technology is known, 2028 seems rather ambitious, but not totally impossible. The company

Segment 2 (05:00 - 06:00)

Muon Inc is working on something similar. These reactors likely wouldn't be used to power cities, but you could use them to power a data center or a factory complex or similar. The subcritical reactors have another benefit, which is that one can use them to burn radioactive waste while creating energy from it. The Swiss company Transmutex specializes in this. Besides these, there are a few governmental projects in Belgium, China, and Japan. In summary, subcritical reactors could indeed make nuclear fission power much safer, but I'm skeptical that they'll be either cheap or small. Maybe the reactors can't run away. Their investors certainly can. I'm very protective of my privacy, but it's becoming incredibly difficult online when there are dozen companies tracking you each time you open a website. That's why I'm signed up to Incogni. Incogni is a service that keeps your personal data out of the hands of data brokers. These are companies which collect data about you each time you visit a website and when you fill in information, then they sell this information off. You can request that they remove your data, but this is incredibly time-consuming. Incogni automates this process. It's very simple. You sign up and they'll contact the big sinners, request that your personal details be removed. They also now have a new custom removal feature where you can submit specific websites. If you use my code Sabina or the custom link in the info below, you'll get 60% off of Incogni, which isn't expensive in the first place. That's an amazing deal, so go and check this out. Thanks for watching. See you tomorrow.

Другие видео автора — Sabine Hossenfelder

Ctrl+V

Экстракт Знаний в Telegram

Экстракты и дистилляты из лучших YouTube-каналов — сразу после публикации.

Подписаться

Дайджест Экстрактов

Лучшие методички за неделю — каждый понедельник