Kimi K2-0905: NEW Chinese AI Destroys Claude?

Kim K2-0905. New Chinese AI destroys Claude. Today I'm going to show you the brand new Chinese AI that just shocked everyone. This thing just dropped and it's already beating Claude in some crazy tests. I ran it through my own benchmarks and the results will blow your mind. We're talking about coding, problem solving, and real world tasks. This could change everything we know about AI right now. Get ready because this is huge. Hey, if we haven't met already, I'm the digital avatar of Julian Goldie, CEO of SEO agency Goldie Agency. Whilst he's helping clients get more leads and customers, I'm here to help you get the latest AI updates. So, there's this new AI called Kim K2-0905 that just came out of China. And everyone's asking me, is this thing actually competitive? Well, I spent the last few days testing it, and the results are wild. But before I dive in, Julian Goldie reads every comment, so make sure you comment below and let me know what you think about this new AI. Now, here's what happened. This new Kimmy model dropped and immediately people started looking at how it performs against established benchmarks. And I'm thinking, okay, another AI model, probably just hype, right? Wrong. Let me break down exactly what the benchmarks show, and then I'll show you my real world tests. First, SWE bench verified. This tests how good the AI is at real software engineering tasks. Think fixing bugs, writing code, solving actual programming problems that developers face every day. Kim K2-0905 scored 69. 2. For context, Claude Sonet four scores 72. 7. So Kimmy is really close to one of the best models out there. Next, SWE multilingual. This tests programming tasks in different languages, not just English. We're talking Chinese, Spanish, French, all kinds of languages mixed with code. Here's where Kimmy shines. Kimmy K2-905 scored 55. 9. Claude scored 53. 3. Kimmy actually beats Claude here. And this makes sense. It's a Chinese model built to handle multiple languages. Terminal bench testing. This tests how good the AI is at using command line interfaces, like actually using a computer terminal to get stuff done. Kimmy scored 44. 5. Claude scored 36. 4. That's a significant gap. Kimmy is clearly better at terminal tasks. MultiSsweb bench test multiple software engineering tasks at once. Kimmy scored 33. 5. Claude scored 35. 7. Pretty close. And SWEDEV test development workflow tasks. Kimmy scored 66. 6. Claude scored 67. 1. Almost identical. And this is where things get really exciting because inside my AI profit boardroom, we've been testing all these new models with real business use cases. Not just coding benchmarks, but actual profit generating activities. If you want to see how I'm using these AIs to scale businesses and save hundreds of hours with automation, check out the AI profit boardroom. We currently have 1,000 members and the community is incredible. Link is in the comments. So, what do these numbers actually mean? Kimi is competitive, really competitive. It's not dominating everything, but it's winning in specific areas like multilingual coding and terminal work. But here's where it gets really interesting. I didn't just look at benchmark scores. I actually tested Kimmy with real coding tasks. I gave Kimmy prompts to build actual games, and the results were impressive. First test, I said, "Design a whack-a-mole game in one HTML file. Moles pop up randomly. Player clicks to score points. Timer counts down. Kimmy delivered a fully functional game with smooth animations, proper game timing, and responsive controls. The mole randomization felt natural, and the scoring system worked perfectly. Second test. Create a single file HTML demo of a cozy idle farming game inspired by Grower Garden. Use inline CS andJS, canvas or DOM for visuals, clickable plots that plant harvest, automated workers to buy as upgrades, cosmetic pets, weekly reward UI, and local storage to persist farm state. This was complex. Multiple game systems, data persistence, complete UI. Kimmy's code was clean and well organized. The farming mechanics worked smoothly. The upgrade system was intuitive, and the visual design was polished. Third test. Build a word guessing game like Hangman with randomized words, hints, and a responsive UI. Kimmy created a fully functional game with a sophisticated hint system, smart word selection, and a clean interface. The difficulty progression felt balanced. Fourth test. Create a platform jumping game. Doodle jump clone in one HTML file. Player bounces upwards on platforms. Score increases with height. The physics engine Kimmy built felt polished. Jumping mechanics were smooth. Platform generation was well distributed and the scoring system scaled properly with height. Final test. Make a frogger clone in one HTML file. Player moves across road avoiding cars. Wins when reaching the other side. Kimmy created a working

game with precise collision detection and fair but challenging car movement patterns. Here's what impressed me most. These weren't just working prototypes. These were genuinely fun, polished games you could actually play and enjoy. Now, let me tell you something that most people don't realize. These benchmark scores, they're just the beginning. What really matters is how these AIs perform in real business scenarios. Can they help you write better emails? create content? Can they help you automate your business processes? But let me get back to Kimmy versus Claude. Here's what I think is going to happen. You're going to see more specialized AI models coming out. models that are really good at specific tasks rather than trying to be good at everything. Kimmy is clearly optimized for developers who work internationally. If you're coding and you need to work with multiple languages, this might be your go-to AI. Claude is still the overall winner for general use cases. If you need one AI that's good at everything, Claude is probably still your best bet. But here's the real question. Do you even need the best AI? Most people are still not using AI to its full potential. They're asking chat GPT basic questions when they could be automating entire business processes. I've been working with AI for years now. I and I can tell you that knowing which model is 2% better doesn't matter if you don't know how to use it properly. That's why I created the AI money lab. It's got over 20,000 members now and we share 100 plus use cases, SOPs, and processes for actually making money with AI. not just playing around with it, but building real businesses. Inside the AI Money Lab, you get access to all my video notes, step-by-step tutorials, and a checklist of 100 different ways to use AI for business. We add new content every single day. Plus, you'll see exactly how I'm using these new models like Kimmy in real business scenarios. Link is in the comments and description. Now, let me tell you something controversial. I don't think the model wars really matter that much anymore. Yeah, I just spent 10 minutes comparing these models, but here's the truth. They're all getting really good really fast. The real advantage isn't in having the best model. It's in knowing how to use these tools effectively. I see people spending hours debating whether Claude or GPT or now Kimi is better. Meanwhile, they're not using any of them to actually improve their lives or businesses. It's like debating whether a Ferrari or Lamborghini is faster while you're still walking everywhere. The opportunity right now isn't in finding the perfect AI. is in learning how to use AI period. But okay, let's say you want to try Kimik K2-0905. How do you actually use it? Right now, it's available through hugging face. You can access it through their API or through some third party interfaces. It's not as easy to access as Claude or Chat GBT yet, but that'll probably change soon. And here's my prediction. Within the next 6 months, you're going to see a bunch of Chinese AI models that are competitive with the Western ones. Not just Kimmy, but models from BU, Alibaba, and other Chinese tech giants. This is going to create even more competition, which is great for users. But there's also a geopolitical angle here that nobody's talking about. China is clearly investing heavily in AI independence. They don't want to rely on American AI models for their technology stack. And honestly, that makes total sense from a strategic perspective. But for us as users, this just means more options and better technology. Now, should you switch from Claude to Kimmy? Probably not, unless you specifically need the multilingual capabilities or terminal work. Should you keep an eye on these Chinese models? Absolutely. The AI landscape is changing fast. And the companies that adapt quickly are going to have a huge advantage. Speaking of adapting quickly, if you want to stay ahead of all these AI developments, you need to be in communities where people are actually testing and implementing these tools. That's why I recommend checking out the AI profit boardroom. We test every new AI model that comes out and figure out how to use it for business. Currently 1,000 members and growing fast. But let me give you some practical advice right now. Don't get caught up in the model wars. Pick one AI, whether it's Claude, GPT, or now Kimmy, and learn to use it really well. Master the basics first. Learn how to write good prompts. Learn how to break down complex tasks. Learn how to chain AI operations together. Once you're actually proficient with one model, then you can start experimenting with others. Because here's what I've learned after building a sevenf figureure agency and helping thousands of students. Execution beats perfection every time. The person who uses a worse AI model but knows how to use it well will always beat the person who has the best AI model but doesn't know what they're doing. And right now most people fall into that second category. They spend all their time researching which AI is best instead of actually using AI to solve real problems. Don't be that person. Pick a model. learn it well and start building. Now, here's what I want you to do after watching this video. First, comment below and let me know. Are you team Claude or are you interested in trying Kimi? Julian reads every comment

so make sure to share your thoughts. Second, if you want to learn how to actually use AI to grow your business, book a free SEO strategy session. We'll show you exactly how we're using AI to get our clients more leads and customers. Link is in the comments and description. Third, join the AI money lab. This is where we share all our SOPs, processes, and real use cases for making money with AI. Over 20,000 members, 100 plus tutorials, and we add new content every day. Everything you need to start profiting from AI is in there. Link in the comments and description. The AI revolution is happening right now. Models like Kim K2-0905 prove that the competition is heating up, and that's great news for all of us. But remember, the best A is the one you actually use. So, stop researching and start implementing. I'll see you in the next video where I'll be testing even more cuttingedge AI tools and showing you exactly how to use them for business. Until then, keep