NEW Microsoft Phi-4 Update is INSANE! (FREE!) 🤯

big news from Microsoft today as have just announced the Microsoft 54 release on hugging face we're going to be testing it out today so you can get free access I'll be showing you exactly how to use it plus some of the key benchmarks so you can actually get access to it directly on hugging face as you can see right here and if you're

wondering okay how does it perform it's a reasoning Model A little bit like for example GPT so you can see 54 over here versus 53 which is the previous model from Microsoft then you've got quen gpc4 llama Quin 2. 5 and GPT 40 right now you can see that for example in the benchmarks here it's winning on science and also on maths and this is completely free to access you can see the model summary here so it said 54 is a state-ofthe-art open model built upon a blend of synthetic data sets data filtered from public domain websites and academic books one of the main use cases for this is reasoning and logic and you can see a summary of this so 54 offers high quality results at a small size this is a available to run on L Lama as well which means that you can run it locally and it is an open-source model

so if you want to start using it you can get access via any chat so for example on hugging face. com you can select your model right here and all of these models are actually free so for example you can select blexy mistra grock llama quen but the main one we're going to focus on today is 54 and we'll test it and see how it performs additionally what you can also do is run it locally for example you can get it locally via GitHub Hub but we're going to focus on any chat for now cuz it would just be easier to test and install so the first

problem that I'm going to try is I will say create an SEO cost calculate website brand colors equals and we'll see if you can just create a basic website straight off the bat now one thing you're going to notice is it is super slow when it's replying right it might estimate like 17 seconds but actually it tends to be more like 20 or 30 seconds it does depend where it's being hosted and I'm sure Depend and also like probably how many people are using it and that sort of thing because we're accessing it via any chat that's just something to be aware of it's not that fast when I've tested out now if we actually get the response you can see that it's defined the scope of the project but it's not actually built it so I'm going to say now create the HTML CSS and JS and we'll see how that performs so you can see down here for example it estimated 16 seconds but that's already running well beyond that so let's take the HTML and the CSS and then plug it into live weave to preview it and we have the website ready to go it does work first time around which is great now let's see how

it performs for actual content creation so I'm just going to give it a basic prompt that I would give to something like Claude for example I'm going to say create an SE optimize article for this what is SEO for Content creation do this easy to read UK grammar FAQs headers keyword in the first and last line keep it real first person Etc and we'll hit enter and then see how that performs honestly one of the things I would say is it's definitely not going to replace any no code to just going back to the prompt while we're waiting for this to be done when I look at the first prompt in the outputs I'm like I'm not going to use that it's not going to replace for example something like deep seek which tends to reply faster also the API is pretty much free because it's so cheap and additionally the design outputs that you get from something like deep seek or bold. new or any of these other tools tends to be a lot better so for actually coding websites it's okay it does the job it doesn't do anything special so just something to bear in mind there now let's check out for Content creation so what's bothering you about SEO I don't really like that the title I'll be honest with you so it's not outperforming Claude when it comes to writing content let's just read the actual content so it says you're probably wondering what on Earth is SEO and do I really need it it's a fair question you're not alone and feeling a bit lost the especially with all the tech Jaron floating around so let's break it down not bad at all to be fair like the content itself is not bad it's a little bit generic if I'm honest with you but I've definitely seen worse right the content itself is not bad it's not going to replace Claude if we actually put the same content prompt through Claude we'll test that side by side and just see how it performs which I would say is probably the gold standard of writing content so let's plug that in and see how it performs side by side versus Microsoft so we got the outputs from Claude over here and then the outputs from 54 over here bear in mind this update was released quite a long time ago so if we look at the headings for example The Heading is much better what is SEO a No Nonsense guide to ranking in 2025 the content itself just feels a lot more humanized it's better formatted it reads more humanized like it's far and Beyond a better model versus 54 is not going to replace writing or coding for me anytime soon from what I can see now

what I'm going to do is I'm going to test the prompt that says humanizes so it bypasses AI detectors 100% of the time must be 100% non AI detectable right so if we grab that content that we previously got from 54 and also what you going to notice is the content itself the previous output actually cut off halfway through so it's cut off in that sentence where it says you start by finding keywords like and then it's just cut off but if we take this content um then we're going to go to zero GPT and just see how it performs before we humanize it right so if you look at this it comes out at 76% generated for AI right now so basically it's very obvious that the content is AI generated and any sort of AI detection tool and therefore probably Google can figure out that it's AI detectable so now what we're going to do is we've asked it to make it 100% humanized you can see again the content has been cut off down here so again this is not ideal for writing content honestly like I just use Claude at this point but I know people out there want me to test out so we're going to now run this through zero GPT the previous content performed at 76% let's see how it performs after we run the humanizing content through 54 so let's plug that in hit detect X see how it performs and it's gone down to 60% right so it's dropped by 16% but honestly it's not done that great now if we actually run that through something like chat gbt version of reasoning models which is 01 mini so we can use a very similar model from chat GPT and see how that performs versus 54 and from here we're going to use exactly the same problem which is humanize this so it bypasses AI detectors must be 100% non AI detectable we'll hit enter and just see how that performs and whether we can get better output and a better score directly from gpd1 actually what's interesting is gp1 refuses to answer me so I'm going to switch to 01 instead of 01 and that seems to actually be doing it right so what's interesting about this is 01 mini will not humanize my content but 01 itself will which is basically the bigger version of 01 mini so we'll grab that content now we'll plug that into zero GPT and see how that performs and that goes all the way down to 35% it's not perfect but you can see here that with a few tweaks we could easily get that down to 0% AI detectable so far

honestly it's not performing as well as I hoped the hype makes it out to perform right so for example number one for coding it's okay it can build websites but they just don't look very good versus say something like B up for writing content Claude is actually much better and much more humanized but humanizing content so bypasses a detectors I would still use the main version of chat gpt1 because that seems to do a better job or I would use one of the three humanizer tools I've got inside my free course Link in the comments description let's try this one so we're going to say now create a onepage website for this niche video SE ranking service brand colors equals must be a beautiful Sleek design keyword equals video ranking service Source context blah blah and we'll go back to 54 plug this in and we'll see how that performs so let's hit enter honestly at this point like from what I can see 54 does everything in a mediocre way right it doesn't seem to be the best at anything but it does seem to get reasonable outputs each time I test it but the problem here as well is even though it's free is quite slow which means that I wouldn't use it that much for example if I went over to deep seek can ask to do exactly the same thing and we plug that in it's going to give me an output straight off the bat look at that straight into the HTML it's building out airp now if we go back to the output from fight 4 now we'll grab the HTML we're going to run that through live weave so we got the CSS and the HTML over here and you can see the output here so it's just really average right that's a pretty ugly landing page not great I can't build a website off that if you want to see what it should look like here's an example from bold. new or you can use bold DIY as well you can host bold DIY locally and then get a much better output and you can see what the website should actually look like versus the outputs from 54 let's have a look what deep seek managed to do with the same prompt so it's actually just giv us one output HTML which makes it easier to get it set up and installed we're going to plug that in over here and look at that look at the difference like this is the output from Deep seek so I literally just copied and pasted the HTML from Deep seek directly into live weave and you can see that just looks like 10 times better versus the previous version that Microsoft's 54 gave us and let's just check that link works and sends traffic directly to our funnels it does so you get a good feel for this is okay for coding pretty mediocre for front end design f for is pretty mediocre I don't know whether it's because I'm using it directly through hugging face but it just doesn't seem that impressive to me and then for Content writing it's okay Claude is beating it and for humanization it's okay but honestly chat gp1 is still beating it we've run it through its bases today and honestly I probably wouldn't switch to using it for now I know it's been a bit of a brutal review but you know me I don't like to BS and I'm open to test in 54 or new updates in the future so thanks much for watching

if you want to get 200 chat GPT aiso prompts plus some real case studies and examples including all the prompts that I mentioned today feel free to get that link in the comments description and if you want to get 1 to1 SE strategy session feel free to build that in we'll show you how we take websites from 0 to 145,000 business month generate hundreds of thousands of dollars in sales on this free link building acceleration session you get a free SEO domination plan discover the secrets SEO link building we answer any questions you have one to one you'll learn the best link building strategy for your website plus how to quickly add rank your competitive link building and how to stand XO traffic based on what's working for us feel free to book that in appreciate you watching and see you on the next one bye-bye