Stopping a WiFi Jammer and Other Radiation Is Easy?

Stopping a WiFi Jammer and Other Radiation Is Easy?

Machine-readable: Markdown · JSON API · Site index

Поделиться Telegram VK Бот
Транскрипт Скачать .md
Анализ с AI

Оглавление (3 сегментов)

Segment 1 (00:00 - 05:00)

meaning if I bring it close to my Laptop whose internet connection worked just fine, then it immediately loses that connection. And no! This is not illegal because it only works up to a distance of around 40cm. This jammer works by spewing out electromagnetic waves that come with around the same frequency your WiFi utilizes. And needless to say such unwanted electromagnetic waves are not only annoying for my WiFi network, but they can also influence the functionality of basically any electronics circuit. This all ties into EMC aka Electromagnetic Compatibility and in the last episode of my EMC adventure, I took some of my homemade Buck/Boost converters that can step up or down a variable input voltage to a stable output voltage and got them tested in a proper EMC chamber. The results were pretty clear telling us that they all radiate too many electromagnetic waves and thus failed the test. Now back then I ended the video by saying that there are 3 solutions to this problem. But recently while taking apart an old hard drive, I noticed a fourth solution we forgot about; SHIELDING! And believe it or not, but shielding is all around us when it comes to electronics and often times overlooked. So in this video let me show you what shielding techniques are out there and how we can more or less easily shield us not only from a WiFi jammer, but also my DIY circuit. Let's get started! This video is sponsored by Würth Elektronik who provided not only all the shielding material shown in this video, but also this amazing book about the basics of shielding which comes with some very lovely practical examples like your tower PC housing. If you want to check it out then follow my link in the video description. Now when it comes to shielding materials, then it seems like there are 3 big types which get used in almost all cases. And these are different kinds absorber sheets, we got some shielding cabinets which I can even form by myself with this DIY version and we got some aluminium and copper tape. These are really all the essentials and as you can see by putting the big DIY shielding cabinet sheet between the jammer and laptop, we apparently already stopped enough radiation because the internet works just fine again. But of course using this laptops internet connection is not the proper way for measuring the effectiveness of shielding materials. For that Würth Elektronik also sent me these two circuits along with a near field probe. One is a noise source and one is a near field scanner and you can see what they can do after putting it all together and powering everything up. Now as you can hear and see, the receiver is not happy about the noise source. The reason is that it is using this 40MHz oscillator here to obviously create a 40MHz waveform that gets radiated through this square antenna. The near field probe picks this radiation up which then gets amplified and turned into a DC voltage according to which the LEDs and Buzzer reacts. So basically the more radiation the probe reaches, the bigger the DC voltage and thus the more LEDs light up telling us that this is bad. And yeah, this seems to work pretty well as a basic demo which shows us that pretty much any of the given shielding material does dampen the radiation. And of course some perform better than others, mostly because of their thickness or their material choice. There are only 2 problems! The first one is that this setup is limited by the used Amplifier which caps out at a max of 1GHz meaning my 2. 4GHz jammer is not a great fit for testing. And the second one is that this scanner only judges about the overall strength of the radiation and thus we can not tell what frequencies are the big problem which is really important though because when looking at the shielding material data, there is always some kind of diagram involving frequency. So I pushed away this simple, yet lovely demo and instead got myself this thing here which is an SDR aka Software Defined Radio.

Segment 2 (05:00 - 10:00)

Its max range goes up to suitable 6GHz and thus by simply attaching antennas to its inputs, connecting it all to a computer and using a fitting software, we can see exactly what radiations with what frequencies are all around us. So when we position this setup next to our jammer, then we can see that while being powered off, the radiation looks like this and when turning it on, it looks like this, oh boy. Now when putting any of the shielding material between jammer and SDR, then it does decrease the radiation that reaches it, but not in a big way. To show you the best way though, let me firstly insulate my circuit with electrical tape so that nothing will short out. Then I put the jammer onto a copper board onto which I soldered a shielding cabinet which I then completely sealed shut with additional copper tape. And badabooom badabeng we got a Faraday cage out of which only very little radiation should leak which was definitely proved by the SDR, I mean just compare the before and after measurements. The funny thing is though that in such a case you don't need all this specialized material. I mean simply get yourself some tin foil, wrap it around the jammer so that there are absolutely no gaps and you will get some pretty similar good results. This way even my internet connection works just fine besides this active jammer. So in conclusion the material choice does not really matter here as long as the jammer is completely encapsulated in conductive material; but why is that? Well, when we have shielding material then the majority of the waves that hit it either get reflected or absorbed. Now when dealing with higher frequency far fields of above 2MHz which our WiFi jammer definitely is, then 99% of the radiation will get reflected meaning the choice of material does not play a major role as long at it is conductive. Far more important in this case is that there are no gaps because the wavelength of our jammer waves is rather small with 12. 5cm. That means that with a 2mm gap, the shielding effectiveness could be limited to 20dB, which is like 100 times less power coming through, but that can still cause problems. So now you know why your ESP microcontrollers all come with such a cabinet and how easy it actually is to shield from a WiFi signal. But now let's move over to my DIY Buck/Boost converter whose main switching IC uses a frequency of 2. 4MHz. Sadly my SDR can not go that low; but luckily for us we also got problems in this 100MHz to 200MHz region created by the harmonics of my converter. So let's hook it up to a constant load, power my converter so that we get a stable output voltage and then bring the SDR closer. After adjusting its main frequency to 150MHz, we can not really see any kind of interferences yet. But as soon as we draw 500mA from the converter, they quickly appeared and in case you are wondering these hills are our harmonics which are all 2. 4MHz apart from one another. So as a first test, let's once again insulate the circuit and then try tin foil once again which certainly damped the radiation a bit, but not as successful a before. The shielding cabinets with copper plate and copper tape did a slightly better job; but not by a lot. The reason is that lower frequency magnetic field waves do not get reflected that much and instead need to get absorbed. So as a crude last attempt I simply slapped a bunch of the absorber sheets onto my setup and guess what; that damped the radiation so much that you can only barely see the hills anymore, lovely. This worked because absorption mainly depends on the thickness of the material as well as its permeability which consists of µ' and µ'' and those can be found in all the diagrams here. The first one describes how well the material can redirect the magnetic field while the second one is the ability of the material to absorb the magnetic field. And as bonus fact, this can be really useful for NFC or RFID since you can redirect the required waves while damping unwanted frequencies. But getting back to topic and our final conclusion

Segment 3 (10:00 - 10:00)

which we can summarize in a rule of thumb that says when dealing with higher frequencies basically anything conductive and enclosed can do the job and when working with lower frequencies you need something thick with fitting permeability and don't forget to slap on copper tape everywhere because this is like duct tape for EMC problems. Now of course EMC shielding is a big rabbit hole that you can get lost in. But I hope with this video, I could give you a small overview of the most important things. So thanks for watching and I hope you learned something new. If so don't forget to like, share, subscribe and hit the notification bell. Stay creative and I will see you next time.

Другие видео автора — GreatScott!

Ctrl+V

Экстракт Знаний в Telegram

Экстракты и дистилляты из лучших YouTube-каналов — сразу после публикации.

Подписаться

Дайджест Экстрактов

Лучшие методички за неделю — каждый понедельник