looking more and more like vaporware, O'Leary decides to announce yet another world's biggest data center project. In February of 2026, he published a press release saying they intend to build a 7. 5 GW data center in Utah. To be clear, 7. 5 GW is just a big number that Kevin O'Leary made up, so we shouldn't take it too seriously. But, it's worth stepping back to understand just how big this is. The entire state of Utah consumes on average 4 GW of electricity. O'Leary wants to build natural gas power plants that will more than double Utah's electricity generation just to supply his data centers. In April of 2026, O'Leary went on Fox News to talk about the project. Kevin O'Leary here. He's helping build a large-scale data center in Utah, which are expected to generate massive energy capacity and joins us now. Kevin, what happened on Friday to your project? We got the MIDA designation, very important. The challenge we have against the Chinese is they're building 10x the power we are. They build a gig, another gig. We've been stalled out. We've had permitting problems across the country. Utah stepped up and said, "Look, we can compete. Not only do we have the land, 40,000 acres, we've got a pipeline running through the land, and we have this designation that can accelerate permitting. " It's really about how do we catch up with the Chinese are doing because this is 40,000 acres designated for massive project. We're going to start with around three gigs, which is a ton, and obviously the hyperscalers and I would argue the government itself, the Pentagon, maybe the Department of War. This is going to be a very secure site. — So, we know this. When you talk about estimated tech company investment capital spending for the US, we have 50 527 billion dollars. China has 70 billion dollars. So, right now, we seem to have more of the investment. They don't worry about red tape in China. They are the red tape. — Well, and they don't even they never lay it down. That's our problem. The big guy in China, the supreme leader says, "Put a data center there. " We can't let them beat us in AI because the future conflicts of the world of the world, even the one you're seeing right now, is really compute driven. All these drones attacking everywhere. The problem with Kevin O'Leary is that almost everything he says is false or at least highly misleading. He tries to frame his proposed Utah data center as a national security priority. He says it is imperative that the US catch up to China in terms of AI data center development. Because China doesn't have red tape, they're building GW after GW of data centers. He heavily implies that China is building AI data centers faster than the US, and his Utah data center is needed to catch up. O'Leary provides zero evidence of this narrative, but it sounds plausible. China is a big country. Maybe they are building AI data centers faster than the US. The problem is it's not true. As the Fox host points out, according to Goldman Sachs, the US is expected to spend 500 billion dollars on AI data centers in 2026 compared to just 70 billion dollars in China. O'Leary suggests that they could sell the data center capacity to the US military. This is an absurd idea. The military indeed uses AI tools, but they purchase AI from private companies such as OpenAI and Google. The military does not build or run its own proprietary large language models. They certainly don't need a 7. Finally, he talks about receiving MIDA designation, which he says will really speed up permitting. So, what is this MIDA designation? MIDA is the Military Installation Development Authority. MIDA's name might lead you to believe that the organization is part of or at least associated with the US military, but it's not. It has no connection to the US military or the federal government. MIDA is a state-level economic development authority created by the Utah legislature in 2007 with the power to grant tax breaks to private developers. Its original purpose was to fund infrastructure improvements around Utah's Hill Air Force Base to keep the base attractive to the Pentagon and prevent it from being closed in future federal base closure rounds. Over time, however, MIDA's remit has expanded well beyond that original mission, and it now hands out tax breaks for all kinds of projects pitched as economic development. In April, MIDA gave a tax break to O'Leary's proposed data center project. Utah levies an energy use tax of 6%. MIDA agreed to decrease the tax rate to 0. 5% for the project. If and when the data center starts generating electricity, it will pay a reduced tax rate to the state. Neither MIDA nor any other government entity is providing any upfront funding for the project. And just like with the Alberta data center, I have seen zero evidence that O'Leary has raised any money to date. O'Leary created a company called O'Leary Digital, which is in charge of both the Alberta and Utah data centers. The February 2026 press release contains the following language. O'Leary Digital has capitalized both Wonder Valley Utah and Wonder Valley Alberta to advance each project through permitting and towards shovel ready execution. The company has retained a blue-chip roster of leading global investment banks to serve as capital markets advisors in structuring and securing project level equity and debt financing for both developments. Let's translate this corporate jargon into plain English. It says O'Leary Digital has capitalized both projects. I believe that this is referring to O'Leary's own personal money. Remember, O'Leary previously said that he was using his own money to fund the Alberta data center as he awaits external funding. O'Leary doesn't have enough money to actually begin construction on either project. He just set up the corporate structure and hired some advisors. The company has retained some unnamed investment banks to help structure financing for both the Utah and Alberta data centers. The investment banks have no intention of investing their own money into the data centers. O'Leary has hired them as brokers to help him find potential investors. Anybody can hire an investment bank. That does not guarantee that the investment bank will be able to find any willing investors. The press release conspicuously fails to mention any investor having committed any money into either project. Remember, in the Fox News interview, O'Leary brags about the MIDA designation, which he says can accelerate the permitting process. This is true. The state of Utah is fully supporting the project, but you will also need to get approval from the county. The proposed data center will be located in Box Elder County, Utah. In late April, the county council was going to hold a vote on whether or not to approve the project, but the vote had to be delayed due to large numbers of local residents who came to protest. The protesters are mostly concerned about the data center's water usage. Utah is a desert. Water is already scarce. The Great Salt Lake in Utah has been slowly evaporating over the past few decades as the state already doesn't have enough water for its existing needs. This is an odd place to build the world's biggest data center campus, which will consume millions of gallons of water. While the concern from the local residents is understandable, I think it is not justified. Just like the oil refinery and the Alberta data center, this Utah data center is vaporware, which will never be built. All right, guys. That wraps it up for this video. What do you think about Kevin O'Leary's data center ambitions? Let us know in the comments section below. As always, thank you so much for watching, and we'll see you in the next one. Wall Street Millennial, signing out.