Everything I make for this channel runs through the same AI workflows. Not a course. Not a prompt pack. You download them, plug your business in, and run them. One hour, one session and a month of content that builds your audience: https://www.incomecreator.pro/ltao1
The "User History Moat" is a lie.
Sam Altman recently claimed that your chat history is the ultimate competitive advantage—a lock-in that keeps you tied to OpenAI. He’s wrong.
In this video, I break down exactly why that advantage is dead and how I moved 3 years of ChatGPT data into Google's NotebookLM in minutes. We are moving from "smart chatbots" to true Personal Intelligence.
In this video: 0:00 Why Sam Altman is wrong about "History" 1:22 The Python Script: Exporting ChatGPT Data 2:15 Uploading to NotebookLM (The "Liquid Context" Hack) 3:07 Why Gemini’s Ecosystem wins for Systems Thinkers
Resources Mentioned: 📂 Get the Python Script: [LINK TO GITHUB/DRIVE/OPT-IN] 🧠 NotebookLM: notebooklm.google.com
The Core Argument: If your data is portable, the "smartest" model doesn't win. The best Operating System wins. Gemini isn't just a chatbot; it's the layer connecting your Docs, Drive, and email. That is the real moat.
#Gemini #NotebookLM #ChatGPT #SystemsThinking #AIInfrastructure
Oh, that is wow that he would say that because it's so easy to download all of your chat GPG data, all three years of it. And then I have a Python script that I've been giving everybody. You run it and it chunks your files up so that they're small enough to fit into Notebook LM. And I've uploaded three years of my chat GPT history to notebook LM. So, if I start a new conversation, click notebook LM, we should see one that says chatgpt 202025 183 sources right here. So, whatever advantage he thought they had to keep people, it is completely and utterly gone. Like, there's no reason to keep chat GPT as the primary AI that you use. I'm not going to completely get rid of it because I still use it to fact check and kind of look for logical gaps with other models that I use, but Gemini, you just get so much for $20. Like, it's all over the place. You get it in Docs, you get Gemini Alpha with Sheets, you get it in vids, you get it everywhere. Notebook LM, it's just it's all over the place, man. And at some point, these models are smart enough right now, but at some point, the more they try to make them quote unquote smarter, they're just going to turn into philosophers. be having flowery speech and sounding smart, but not really helpful or useful at all. And what we have right now is good enough. So, Gemini is going to be my number one, especially with this personal intelligence update because now it's tied into the Google ecosystem in a way where it really personalizes everything. Like I was playing with it last night to like 2:00 in the morning and I was just telling like, "Hey, write a email, a follow-up email to my son's teacher. " It went into my email and it found the right one. There are several emails between me and my children's teachers. It found the right one, the one that needed a follow-up, and it wrote it, and it was actually contextually accurate. I told her to do a couple other things. Find the email course I signed up for. It found the email course, put it all in the chat. Uh, I was able to use the instructions to actually fix two problems with Gemini that I thought it had, which was the short responses when it should have been long responses and not following directions in a step-by-step format just by copying and pasting to instructions into the internal memory, which I was sitting there copying and pasting for a long time last night, about 20 minutes, and I never hit a limit. And I was just kept expecting like, okay, Google's going to tell me I can't put anything else in here. And I just kept copying, kept pasting, kept copying, kept pasting. So whatever chat GPT or Claw think they have in this regard, they're washed. Like the only people who are probably going to keep saying, you know, Claude this, Claw that, are developers, people who use it to code. And that's fair if you But for the majority of consumers, the majority of consumers who most likely have 200 Google accounts, like this is just a clear win. to clear wind right here.